Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
VERDICT: Rittenhouse found not guilty on all counts
#1
Breaking...

Quote:A breakdown of the Kyle Rittenhouse not guilty verdict

Count 1: First Degree Reckless Homicide - Not Guilty

Count 2: First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety - Not Guilty

Count 3: First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety - Not Guilty

Count 4: First Degree Intentional Homicide - Not Guilty

Count 5: Attempted First Degree Intentional Homicide - Not Guilt
Source: Fox
Reply

#2
Lunacy.

Reply

#3
A just verdict, made possible from all the video evidence, never should have gone to trial.  Lots of people have egg on their face due to a rush to judgement.  Hopefully, they will acknowledge that their characterization was incorrect.  No evidence that he was a white supremacist, hopefully the MSM and political candidates will apologize for their false commentary.
Reply

#4
Absolutely grotesque but not at all surprised by it. 
Reply

#5
it was  easily self  defense   
Reply

#6
this should be entertaining....
Reply

#7
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
this should be entertaining....
bet I get a lota   hate  for saying self  defense
Reply

#8
I am not an attorney

and neither were the prosecutors (at best they were the best defense attorneys)


If you have been following this case, this is not surprising 
Reply

#9
Quote: @Skodin said:
I am not an attorney

and neither were the prosecutors (at best they were the best defense attorneys)


If you have been following this case, this is not surprising 
I didnt follow it that closely other than to know that what the media was selling at the time of the shooting,  and reality are way different stories. 

also the prosecutor in the case is an absolute dip shit.

I will say I am a bit surprised that he wasnt found guilty on at least some of the charges out of fear of repercussions for the area from those that wont agree with the verdict.    but again,  i did not follow the case very closely but it does sound like the kid was acting in self defense,  IMO it doesnt excuse him being there in the first place,  but if he shouldnt have been there then those they he was defending himself from shouldnt have been their either.
Reply

#10
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@Skodin said:
I am not an attorney

and neither were the prosecutors (at best they were the best defense attorneys)


If you have been following this case, this is not surprising 
I didnt follow it that closely other than to know that what the media was selling at the time of the shooting,  and reality are way different stories. 

also the prosecutor in the case is an absolute dip shit.

I will say I am a bit surprised that he wasnt found guilty on at least some of the charges out of fear of repercussions for the area from those that wont agree with the verdict.    but again,  i did not follow the case very closely but it does sound like the kid was acting in self defense,  IMO it doesnt excuse him being there in the first place,  but if he shouldnt have been there then those they he was defending himself from shouldnt have been their either.
His dad and grandparents lived there.  He lived 15 miles away.  

The 3 felons he shot were from a lot further away.  Not to mention all were white, so the idiotic statements about racism are just that, idiotic.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.