The vaccinated need to go

[savannahskol]

0-2.   Zim needs to lead.   

[Guest]

Wut 

[Guest]

Here's what I do know: the unvaccinated ARE going.....every day. Wishing too late they would have gotten vaccinated. 

[Guest]

lol what is this?

[Guest]

@AGRforever said:
lol what is this?

This is what we are dealing with in society, people like this. Unhinged weirdos. Over a f#$%ing vaccine of all things, lmao. 

[Guest]

@StickyBun said:
Here's what I do know: the unvaccinated ARE going.....every day. Wishing too late they would have gotten vaccinated. 

Untrue.  

[Guest]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09...ant-women/

[Guest]

Immunization expert: 'Unvaccinated people are not dangerous; vaccinated people are dangerous for others' - America's Frontline Doctors (americasfrontlinedoctors.org)

[Guest]

I think the OP was joking around...Or not. 

[Guest]

@Chuckf said:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09...ant-women/

Luckily, both the original article and the "corrections"/updates are available online so one does not need to read articles by Gateway Pundit.

Original article: "Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes."   https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2104983

Correction: "The article has now been updated. ... “Among 827 registry participants who reported a completed pregnancy, 104 experienced spontaneous abortions and 1 had a stillbirth,” rather than, “…a completed pregnancy, the pregnancy resulted in a spontaneous abortion in 104 (12.6%) and in stillbirth in 1 (0.1%); these percentages are well within the range expected as an outcome for this age group of persons whose other underlying medical conditions are unknown.”  https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMx210017

And in another follow-up that address the survey size and participant inclusion:  "Subsequently, we completed telephone follow-up for the 905 pregnancies and enrolled additional persons in the v-safe pregnancy registry. To determine the cumulative risk of spontaneous abortion from 6 to less than 20 weeks of gestation, we used life-table methods to perform an updated analysis, now reported in the Journal, involving 2456 women who received at least one dose of an mRNA Covid-19 vaccine before conception or before 20 weeks of gestation. The estimated risks (14.1% overall and 12.8% in age-standardized analyses) are consistent with the risks of spontaneous abortion reported in the general population."  https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2113516

Interestingly, the editorial referenced in the Gateway Pundit article was not written by any of the scientists who did the original article or the "correction" and she writes: "Among 827 registry participants who reported a completed pregnancy, 104 experienced spontaneous abortions and 1 had a stillbirth. A total of 712 pregnancies (86.1%) resulted in a live birth, mostly among participants who received their first vaccination dose in the third trimester. Among live-born infants, the incidences of preterm birth (9.4%), small size for gestational age (3.2%), and congenital anomalies (2.2%) were consistent with those expected on the basis of published literature. There were no neonatal deaths. These are reassuring data based on reports from pregnant women mostly vaccinated in the third trimester."  https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejme2107070. [

Chuck F. if you find the backtrack in the New England Journal of Medicine, please provide a link and the quote from NEJM, I am open to your thoughts.

Other articles:

https://www.covid-datascience.com/post/nejm-paper-demonstrates-mrna-vaccines-do-not-increase-miscarriage-rate