Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Vikings defensive lines
#1
A guess at how they might line up for each situation:

Starting: Hunter-Pierce-Tomlinson-Wonnum
Running: Hunter-Pierce-Tomlinson-Richardson
Passing: Hunter-Richardson-Griffen-Wonnum
Goal line: Hunter-Pierce-Tomlinson-Richardson-Griffen
Reply

#2
Clara Peller has her answer...
Reply

#3
[Image: yiaboq16czia.gif]
Reply

#4
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
A guess at how they might line up for each situation:

Starting: Hunter-Pierce-Tomlinson-Wonnum
Running: Hunter-Pierce-Tomlinson-Richardson
Passing: Hunter-Richardson-Griffen-Wonnum
Goal line: Hunter-Pierce-Tomlinson-Richardson-Griffen
You think Richardson is better in run defense?  I thought his issue was gap integrity, he penetrates really quickly, but being gap sound is not his best trait.

I think Weatherly may be a better run defender, but IMO Griff, weatherly, wonnum, richardson are going to rotate heavily through at DE and 3 tech to stay fresh.  Pierce and Watts will rotate through at NT with Tomlinson playing 3T and sliding to NT in some pass situations.
Reply

#5
Quote: @greediron said:
@MaroonBells said:
A guess at how they might line up for each situation:

Starting: Hunter-Pierce-Tomlinson-Wonnum
Running: Hunter-Pierce-Tomlinson-Richardson
Passing: Hunter-Richardson-Griffen-Wonnum
Goal line: Hunter-Pierce-Tomlinson-Richardson-Griffen
You think Richardson is better in run defense?  I thought his issue was gap integrity, he penetrates really quickly, but being gap sound is not his best trait.

I think Weatherly may be a better run defender, but IMO Griff, weatherly, wonnum, richardson are going to rotate heavily through at DE and 3 tech to stay fresh.  Pierce and Watts will rotate through at NT with Tomlinson playing 3T and sliding to NT in some pass situations.
That was always his reputation. A penetrating 3T to be sure, but excelled vs. the run. 
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
4 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.