Quote: @purplefaithful said:
Sure, bringing in some outspoken infectious disease specialist will do jack...
I think we can all agree, those who are anti-vax are basing their decisions NOT on science .... so the expert scientists might as well be talking to a wall.
Stupid still reigns Supreme
Quote: @PurplePastor said:
@ BigAl99 said:
@ greediron said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ Waterboy said:
Here we go again with all of the board experts. lol Somehow I'd love to see our experts blow this guy right of the water with their vast knowledge of all things virus. The ones that like to call everybody else stupid, and claim to have "science" on their side. You choose to believe a narrative spoon fed to you by the media, and by the government. That's it. Quit claiming science, because there is no science available at this point proving the long-term safety of these vaccines. In fact, the opposite has been true.
https://www.yahoo.com/now/single-most-qu...00060.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/cIgEyCrxKYgd/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AyvqtHSZTENs/
https://rumble.com/vkopys-a-pathologist-...mref=i2svv&mrefc=2
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nVTAoF8oCsD7/
lmao, Rumble.
For its first seven years, content on Rumble largely consisted of viral videos and news from mainstream media sources as well as videos of kids and animals. In August 2020, however, Representative Devin Nunes accused YouTube of being overly censorious toward his channel and began posting his videos on Rumble. Other prominent conservatives, such as Dinesh D’Souza, Sean Hannity, and Representative Jim Jordan, soon followed.
The platform forbids pornography, harassment, racism, antisemitism, copyright infringement, and illegal content.
Using data from February 2021, researchers studying conspiracy theories and misinformation about COVID-19 noted that several content creators have gained a receptive audience on Rumble after their productions have been pulled from YouTube or Facebook. They include Del Bigtree, Sherri Tenpenny, and Simone Gold.
Following the 2020 United States presidential election, many conservative users of mainstream social media platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, migrated to Rumble. According to Fortune, prior to this migration, the site was a "YouTube clone" filled with home recordings.
Don't get the hate for Rumble. Youtube and google are financially involved in the Covid gain of function funding scandal. So they are involved and abusing their section 230 status, so people are moving to a rival platform. Where is the harm in that?
Yeah, it is definitely flooded with the conservative slant, but I don't see many left leaning channels getting banned on youtube.
It’s where the folks banned on YouTube go. Right or wrong, one of the mods for this site said this is not a site for misinformation, as a mod you may want be a little more informed.
So, YouTube is the determiner of misinformation? Wow!
Numbers don't lie. When people start spouting off about 100k's of deaths and microchips and magnetism and all the other completely made up stuff then yeah.....its not to hard to determine misinformation.
Quote: @"BarrNone55" said:
Somebody needs a ride to the train station.
I was thinking short-bus stop
Quote: @SFVikeFan said:
@ purplefaithful said:
Sure, bringing in some outspoken infectious disease specialist will do jack...
I think we can all agree, those who are anti-vax are basing their decisions NOT on science .... so the expert scientists might as well be talking to a wall.
Stupid still reigns Supreme
The good news is my horse de-wormer stock is soaring.
Quote: @jargomcfargo said:
@ PurplePastor said:
@ minny65 said:
@ PurplePastor said:
@ jargomcfargo said:
@ JR44 said:
Can't teach stupid, these guys won't listen and do not have the level of intelligence to understand what he will be saying. Better off bringing in a hypnotist. Painfully obvious this team is going nowhere this year, I would just start cutting these guys and play the guys who are more interested in winning and the team.
Better off to bring in some chick in a bikini !
Funny how some people can accept a religion based on faith but are unable to accept a vaccine based on science.
Not familiar with the historicity of the Bible are you?
You mean the mention of the plaque's?
You mean plagues? No. I was taking the part I bolded as an indication that the Christian faith is based upon blind faith. Maybe I'm reading too much into jargomcfargo's post? If I am, I will gladly apologize. My point is that based upon historicity (the science of evaluating ancient documents), no ancient writing comes to close to the accuracy, reliability and scientific documentation (archeology) of the Bible. It has been more reliably and accurately passed down to us than the writings of Plato, Socrates, Caesar, Homer, etc.
Like all these message boards, someone takes one sentence and attacks it out of context. I didn't use the word blind nor even state which religion. You have my apology for taking you out of context. I would only hope salvation is based on faith or I'm doomed. I agree. I'm used to nonsensical statements about the Bible or Jesus being a myth and wrongly assumed you might be suggesting something similar.
My point is, religion and science need not be exclusionary. Again, I agree.
Unfortunately, this debate has become simply political, therefore there is a lot of polarization.
This board isn't the place for it, but I am always up for discussions on the Christian faith; such as the influence Saul of Tarsus had on Christianity.
Have a blessed day Pastor. Thank you! You as well.
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@ Waterboy said:
Here we go again with all of the board experts. lol Somehow I'd love to see our experts blow this guy right of the water with their vast knowledge of all things virus. The ones that like to call everybody else stupid, and claim to have "science" on their side. You choose to believe a narrative spoon fed to you by the media, and by the government. That's it. Quit claiming science, because there is no science available at this point proving the long-term safety of these vaccines. In fact, the opposite has been true.
https://www.yahoo.com/now/single-most-qu...00060.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/cIgEyCrxKYgd/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AyvqtHSZTENs/
https://rumble.com/vkopys-a-pathologist-...mref=i2svv&mrefc=2
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nVTAoF8oCsD7/
not sure where I fall, but i do have a question, the vaccine has been out less than 16 months, how could anybody from either side make any claims to its long term safety, both pro or con, with any credibility? any claims either way have to be based on speculation, educated guesses, or simply pulling shit out of their ass... wouldnt they?
The fact you, and many others, think the vaccine is newly developed is kind of disturbing. It's not. Coronavirus vaccines have been in development for over 15 years. That's why we could attack this quickly.
Funny - FDA approved Pfizer vaccines today.
48 hours earlier FDA put a warning:
"You are not a horse. You are not a cow" in response to the overdoses of Ivermectin
So anti-vax ding dongs take note: quit touting experimental drugs and get the FDA approved one. Excuses are over.
Quote: @PurplePastor said:
@ BigAl99 said:
@ greediron said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ Waterboy said:
Here we go again with all of the board experts. lol Somehow I'd love to see our experts blow this guy right of the water with their vast knowledge of all things virus. The ones that like to call everybody else stupid, and claim to have "science" on their side. You choose to believe a narrative spoon fed to you by the media, and by the government. That's it. Quit claiming science, because there is no science available at this point proving the long-term safety of these vaccines. In fact, the opposite has been true.
https://www.yahoo.com/now/single-most-qu...00060.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/cIgEyCrxKYgd/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AyvqtHSZTENs/
https://rumble.com/vkopys-a-pathologist-...mref=i2svv&mrefc=2
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nVTAoF8oCsD7/
lmao, Rumble.
For its first seven years, content on Rumble largely consisted of viral videos and news from mainstream media sources as well as videos of kids and animals. In August 2020, however, Representative Devin Nunes accused YouTube of being overly censorious toward his channel and began posting his videos on Rumble. Other prominent conservatives, such as Dinesh D’Souza, Sean Hannity, and Representative Jim Jordan, soon followed.
The platform forbids pornography, harassment, racism, antisemitism, copyright infringement, and illegal content.
Using data from February 2021, researchers studying conspiracy theories and misinformation about COVID-19 noted that several content creators have gained a receptive audience on Rumble after their productions have been pulled from YouTube or Facebook. They include Del Bigtree, Sherri Tenpenny, and Simone Gold.
Following the 2020 United States presidential election, many conservative users of mainstream social media platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, migrated to Rumble. According to Fortune, prior to this migration, the site was a "YouTube clone" filled with home recordings.
Don't get the hate for Rumble. Youtube and google are financially involved in the Covid gain of function funding scandal. So they are involved and abusing their section 230 status, so people are moving to a rival platform. Where is the harm in that?
Yeah, it is definitely flooded with the conservative slant, but I don't see many left leaning channels getting banned on youtube.
It’s where the folks banned on YouTube go. Right or wrong, one of the mods for this site said this is not a site for misinformation, as a mod you may want be a little more informed.
So, YouTube is the determiner of misinformation? Wow!
They do checking, and review sources. Sure you have heard something about it.
Quote:
Funny - FDA approved Pfizer vaccines today.
Be prepared for a whole new wave of excuses. That silly FDA.....
Quote: @SFVikeFan said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ Waterboy said:
Here we go again with all of the board experts. lol Somehow I'd love to see our experts blow this guy right of the water with their vast knowledge of all things virus. The ones that like to call everybody else stupid, and claim to have "science" on their side. You choose to believe a narrative spoon fed to you by the media, and by the government. That's it. Quit claiming science, because there is no science available at this point proving the long-term safety of these vaccines. In fact, the opposite has been true.
https://www.yahoo.com/now/single-most-qu...00060.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/cIgEyCrxKYgd/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AyvqtHSZTENs/
https://rumble.com/vkopys-a-pathologist-...mref=i2svv&mrefc=2
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nVTAoF8oCsD7/
not sure where I fall, but i do have a question, the vaccine has been out less than 16 months, how could anybody from either side make any claims to its long term safety, both pro or con, with any credibility? any claims either way have to be based on speculation, educated guesses, or simply pulling shit out of their ass... wouldnt they?
The fact you, and many others, think the vaccine is newly developed is kind of disturbing. It's not. Coronavirus vaccines have been in development for over 15 years. That's why we could attack this quickly.
Funny - FDA approved Pfizer vaccines today.
48 hours earlier FDA put a warning:
"You are not a horse. You are not a cow" in response to the overdoses of Ivermectin
So anti-vax ding dongs take note: quit touting experimental drugs and get the FDA approved one. Excuses are over.
it is newly developed, thats why it took over a year and millions dying around the globe to get it out to the public. they have been working on MRNA technology for a long time, and they have been working on vaccines for similar viruses, but if this wasnt a new drug to fight a new virus then the fact that it took about 16 months to get it out there from when the virus was first reported would be a bigger red flag to those hesitant to get it since they would be the people that withheld it while millions died.
Quote: @Waterboy said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ Waterboy said:
Here we go again with all of the board experts. lol Somehow I'd love to see our experts blow this guy right of the water with their vast knowledge of all things virus. The ones that like to call everybody else stupid, and claim to have "science" on their side. You choose to believe a narrative spoon fed to you by the media, and by the government. That's it. Quit claiming science, because there is no science available at this point proving the long-term safety of these vaccines. In fact, the opposite has been true.
https://www.yahoo.com/now/single-most-qu...00060.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/cIgEyCrxKYgd/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AyvqtHSZTENs/
https://rumble.com/vkopys-a-pathologist-...mref=i2svv&mrefc=2
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nVTAoF8oCsD7/
lmao, Rumble.
For its first seven years, content on Rumble largely consisted of viral videos and news from mainstream media sources as well as videos of kids and animals. In August 2020, however, Representative Devin Nunes accused YouTube of being overly censorious toward his channel and began posting his videos on Rumble. Other prominent conservatives, such as Dinesh D’Souza, Sean Hannity, and Representative Jim Jordan, soon followed.
The platform forbids pornography, harassment, racism, antisemitism, copyright infringement, and illegal content.
Using data from February 2021, researchers studying conspiracy theories and misinformation about COVID-19 noted that several content creators have gained a receptive audience on Rumble after their productions have been pulled from YouTube or Facebook. They include Del Bigtree, Sherri Tenpenny, and Simone Gold.
Following the 2020 United States presidential election, many conservative users of mainstream social media platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, migrated to Rumble. According to Fortune, prior to this migration, the site was a "YouTube clone" filled with home recordings.
Great comeback. So we should only take news that fact checked by the Biden Administration itself from their approved MSM and Social Network sites. lol I notice that you have absolutely nothing to dispute the content, so you try to belittle it. So brave and shows so much knowledge. lol
Because you can testify to the rigorous standards of researching for the truth and facts that Rumble and bit-chute undergo before allowing content to be posted, right?
I mean what standards of accuracy do you use when finding sources? Oh wait wait, none.
|
