07-21-2021, 07:24 PM
Is there any reason for them to keep having the Olympics in
one city, forcing the host country to build a bunch of new expensive facilities
which fall into disrepair almost immediately?
Why not just use already existing facilities that are close-ish in proximity to the host and give the host some more ceremonial type events? Like would anyone care if the events are
spread out?
one city, forcing the host country to build a bunch of new expensive facilities
which fall into disrepair almost immediately?
Why not just use already existing facilities that are close-ish in proximity to the host and give the host some more ceremonial type events? Like would anyone care if the events are
spread out?