Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Feel Like A Number
#1

[Image: A8uxi2Dr_bigger.jpg]
Amongst the rules proposed this offseason is one by the Chiefs that loosens restrictions on jersey numbers. Part of the proposal would allow RB, WR, TE, FB, LB and DB to wear single digit uniforms.

Do it.
Reply

#2
I dont know...

This is quite controversial to say the least. 


Reply

#3
Quote: @purplefaithful said:
I dont know...

This is quite controversial to say the least. 
Please don't allow a WR wear #1. Why does this even matter?
Reply

#4
I like it the way it is. 
Reply

#5
It's a changing world!
Let everyone pick what they want. 17%A Smile
Reply

#6
Quote: @ThunderGod said:
It's a changing world!
Let everyone pick what they want. 17%A Smile
yeah,  fuck it,  let it be like the xfl where they had all sorts of stupid shit on their jerseys.
Reply

#7
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@ThunderGod said:
It's a changing world!
Let everyone pick what they want. 17%A Smile
yeah,  fuck it,  let it be like the xfl where they had all sorts of stupid shit on their jerseys.
I did like Rod "He Hate Me" Smart...  that one always made me laugh.
Reply

#8
Quote: @Wetlander said:
@JimmyinSD said:
@ThunderGod said:
It's a changing world!
Let everyone pick what they want. 17%A Smile
yeah,  fuck it,  let it be like the xfl where they had all sorts of stupid shit on their jerseys.
I did like Rod "He Hate Me" Smart...  that one always made me laugh.
Me too. Maybe they will end up wearing sponsors on their jerseys at some point like the NBA.
Reply

#9

[Image: chdGsw9A_normal.jpg]
NFL Update
@MySportsUpdate
· 1h
The #Chiefs proposal to expand the use of single-digit numbers is likely to pass when owners vote later this month, per @peter_king. 24 votes are needed.

This would be the updated look:


QB, K, P: 1-19

RB, TE, WR: 1-49, 80-89

DB: 1-49

LB: 1-59, 90-99

OL: 50-79

DL: 50-79, 90-99
Reply

#10
I like the idea of the NFL allowing single digit numbers for back-seven players on defense and all skill-players on offense. Mostly, I feel that way because I think it looks cool (I was a high school defensive end who wore No. 4). And I also get that Chiefs GM Brett Veach pushed the change because, between retired numbers and expanded practice squads, K.C. flat-out ran out of numbers last year (I’ve also been told that Veach likes the way single digits look, too, like a lot of players do). But a buddy of mine did give me something to think about on this, something I hadn’t really thought about: This could be an anti-offense change. Allowing for linebackers to wear low numbers, and become less distinguishable from defensive backs, would make it harder for quarterbacks, and offenses in general, to ID guys presnap, which could lead to more free runs at the passer or mix-ups in protection. That, of course, flies in the face of most changes we’ve seen in the NFL over the years. And yes, the more liberal numbering system works in college and high school, but there’s less substitution and specialization at those levels, making it less of an issue. All of which has left me just a little torn on the idea of this. Which, again, I really like on paper.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.