Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
He's Back
#41
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
https://twitter.com/UReady4Football/stat...32513?s=20
My god, what an embarrassing clip
Reply

#42
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
https://twitter.com/UReady4Football/stat...32513?s=20
In a related story, Kirk Cousins just invested heavily in Blatchford.
Reply

#43
Quote: @Hawkvike25 said:
My god, what an embarrassing clip
I look at that OL line-up and sniff .500 in the air --- again. 
Reply

#44
Quote: @purplefaithful said:
@Hawkvike25 said:
My god, what an embarrassing clip
I look at that OL line-up and sniff .500 in the air --- again. 
Patience, faithful. We're not done yet. In one quick move on the 29th, the Vikings can end up with the following line: 

Brown Jr.- D1 - Bradbury - Cleveland - O'Neill.

Line completely rebuilt. And probably the best line we've had in decades. Will they? Dunno. Those edges will be tempting too. 
Reply

#45
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
@purplefaithful said:
@Hawkvike25 said:
My god, what an embarrassing clip
I look at that OL line-up and sniff .500 in the air --- again. 
Patience, faithful. We're not done yet. In one quick move on the 29th, the Vikings can end up with the following line: 

Brown Jr.- D1 - Bradbury - Cleveland - O'Neill.

Line completely rebuilt. And probably the best line we've had in decades. Will they? Dunno. Those edges will be tempting too. 
Believe me, I know there is no way they go into next season with that OL...No way. 

I think ZBJ is a pipe-dream myself...one of those OT's will be there @ 14, its a matter of how much Zimsu wants and edge over the OT. 
Reply

#46
Wooooooof!

I can’t think of any reason why the Vikings would do this, even as a backup.

Depth isn’t depth if the player isn’t at least average. Maybe he’ll shock the world but yeesh.
Reply

#47
Quote: @pattersaur said:
Wooooooof!

I can’t think of any reason why the Vikings would do this, even as a backup.

Depth isn’t depth if the player isn’t at least average. Maybe he’ll shock the world but yeesh.
this,  Dozier could have been signed in May,  as bad as he is it wouldnt have taken much to replace him.
Reply

#48
This is more the fact that they could bring Dozier back on the minimum without guarantees. It sets the floor, although a low one, for what the interior of the line can be. Yes, Dozier was bad. But they were a very good offense with him in the fold. The goal is still to improve on him but at least the interior line won't be worse. 
Reply

#49
Dozier opted out of blocking last year, so he should be fresh!
Reply

#50
He Sucks! There are no other words.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
5 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.