Quote: @Zanary said:
@ mblack said:
@ Zanary said:
A what...?
I've been very visibly against both "main" treason clubs for the whole time this board has existed, and years prior.
It ain't a secret.
You're utterly full of meaningless, fictional shit.
Your bias is exhumed in your posts. Feel free to review and correct. Saying you are against both is not anything to be proud of. The fact that you seem to put both at same level is enough to know where your allegiance is. There is no way anyone with an ounce of objectivity will place Biden and Trump administration on same level. The Trump regime was simply horrendous for America. Anything less is massaging the truth to help Trump - which is what you have been doing.
I see we resorted to foul language now huh?
Your judgemental wastes of time are nothingness, squared.
I've called out both of those horrid parties forever, and I've called Trump a drooling, horrid idiot for decades...so your froth about "bias" anywhere near him is true ignorance, by someone with more babble than brains.
They are both equally evil in my eyes, as they're complicit in the destruction of the country. One is a shameless, power mongering organization that gets a free pass from the media, the other is a shameless, power mongering organization that gets its "cred" from fighting with said media.
Keeping the country, largely, in an "us vs them" mentality has limited over 100 million people to thinking in moronic binary terms...and both "sides" believe in their imaginary moral superiority. You are a shining example of exactly that!
You can't debate the points, you just go at me...and look like an imbecile in the process. Go chew some crayons, and quit wasting bandwidth.
If only you made points worth debating....hint see my first reply to the rubbish you posted.
I am not going at you. I am just calling out your immaturity, bias and now tantrums.
I hope you can tell the difference.
You know less than nothing. Reminding board junk of their stupidity is generally accompanied by chuckling and shaking my head.
The points were enough to be brought up by the other dnc candidates, and many people who have questioned her record forever. You said nothing about the hypocrisy involving Biden, nothing about her actual, recorded gaffes...
...so, you avoided the points and pretended to be above things. Exactly the filth of the modern left.
Quote: @Zanary said:
You know less than nothing. Reminding board junk of their stupidity is generally accompanied by chuckling and shaking my head.
The points were enough to be brought up by the other dnc candidates, and many people who have questioned her record forever. You said nothing about the hypocrisy involving Biden, nothing about her actual, recorded gaffes...
...so, you avoided the points and pretended to be above things. Exactly the filth of the modern left.
Oh now we are at the point where you know what I know? I am not reminding anyone about your stupidity. It's littered all over in your posts for all to see.
Go back and read your garbage commentary I highlighted. No one said that but you.
Go ahead with your next childish tantrum maybe with some foul language to go with as you have now resorted to that. The stage is yours.
No tantrums here, but I'm glad that other posters actually get into the points that, I assume, have words a bit too big for you.
Learn from them. Baby steps.
Quote: @AGRforever said:
@ Vikergirl said:
@ Zanary said:
It's hardly news, the modern left screamed about "NO MORE OLD WHITE MEN", and got the oldest prez-elect...ever. They screamed about our police state, yet elected an architect of both the police state and the NDAA, and with him a shameless climber who slept her way (sorry, the married man was her visible patron during her climb. It doesn't get much more blatant) to a position where she fought and withheld evidence...while locking up many people of color and finding her conviction rate for marijuana an infamous matter of humor.
I really didn't think the "main party" bar would get lower than in 2016, where two candidates no-one trusted were somehow the biggest choices. Y'all found a way. Congrats...you f**ked our country in every possible orifice yet again.
That whole she slept her way to the top is such a grotesque talking point from conservatives. She had a relationship with Willie Brown who had been estranged from his wife for a decade. Harris and Brown dated briefly in the mid-1990s, after Brown had separated from his wife in 1981. The innuendo got really ugly during her presidential campaign. It seems as though he was trying to give himself credit for her success.
In regard to Harris’ marijuana conviction record, it's important to distinguish between her six-year tenure as attorney general of California and her seven-years as San Francisco district attorney. A 1500 figure is often cited but that comes from Harris’ time as attorney general rather than as district attorney. Harris did not prosecute such convictions as attorney general, which at the time fell under the jurisdiction of the district attorney.
So sexal misdeeds are off limits for liberals but not for conservatives?
The way the brett kavanaugh was treated in my mind makes everyone fair game.
Let's not forget that Biden was "credibly accused" as well. Much more credible that Kavanaugh's accuser, at least she could remember pertinent details.
Quote: @greediron said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ Vikergirl said:
@ Zanary said:
It's hardly news, the modern left screamed about "NO MORE OLD WHITE MEN", and got the oldest prez-elect...ever. They screamed about our police state, yet elected an architect of both the police state and the NDAA, and with him a shameless climber who slept her way (sorry, the married man was her visible patron during her climb. It doesn't get much more blatant) to a position where she fought and withheld evidence...while locking up many people of color and finding her conviction rate for marijuana an infamous matter of humor.
I really didn't think the "main party" bar would get lower than in 2016, where two candidates no-one trusted were somehow the biggest choices. Y'all found a way. Congrats...you f**ked our country in every possible orifice yet again.
That whole she slept her way to the top is such a grotesque talking point from conservatives. She had a relationship with Willie Brown who had been estranged from his wife for a decade. Harris and Brown dated briefly in the mid-1990s, after Brown had separated from his wife in 1981. The innuendo got really ugly during her presidential campaign. It seems as though he was trying to give himself credit for her success.
In regard to Harris’ marijuana conviction record, it's important to distinguish between her six-year tenure as attorney general of California and her seven-years as San Francisco district attorney. A 1500 figure is often cited but that comes from Harris’ time as attorney general rather than as district attorney. Harris did not prosecute such convictions as attorney general, which at the time fell under the jurisdiction of the district attorney.
So sexal misdeeds are off limits for liberals but not for conservatives?
The way the brett kavanaugh was treated in my mind makes everyone fair game.
Let's not forget that Biden was "credibly accused" as well. Much more credible that Kavanaugh's accuser, at least she could remember pertinent details.
No, it wasn't credible at all.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2...046962001/
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
@ greediron said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ Vikergirl said:
@ Zanary said:
It's hardly news, the modern left screamed about "NO MORE OLD WHITE MEN", and got the oldest prez-elect...ever. They screamed about our police state, yet elected an architect of both the police state and the NDAA, and with him a shameless climber who slept her way (sorry, the married man was her visible patron during her climb. It doesn't get much more blatant) to a position where she fought and withheld evidence...while locking up many people of color and finding her conviction rate for marijuana an infamous matter of humor.
I really didn't think the "main party" bar would get lower than in 2016, where two candidates no-one trusted were somehow the biggest choices. Y'all found a way. Congrats...you f**ked our country in every possible orifice yet again.
That whole she slept her way to the top is such a grotesque talking point from conservatives. She had a relationship with Willie Brown who had been estranged from his wife for a decade. Harris and Brown dated briefly in the mid-1990s, after Brown had separated from his wife in 1981. The innuendo got really ugly during her presidential campaign. It seems as though he was trying to give himself credit for her success.
In regard to Harris’ marijuana conviction record, it's important to distinguish between her six-year tenure as attorney general of California and her seven-years as San Francisco district attorney. A 1500 figure is often cited but that comes from Harris’ time as attorney general rather than as district attorney. Harris did not prosecute such convictions as attorney general, which at the time fell under the jurisdiction of the district attorney.
So sexal misdeeds are off limits for liberals but not for conservatives?
The way the brett kavanaugh was treated in my mind makes everyone fair game.
Let's not forget that Biden was "credibly accused" as well. Much more credible that Kavanaugh's accuser, at least she could remember pertinent details.
No, it wasn't credible at all.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2...046962001/
Let me help your reading comprehension. Please slowly read the bold over twice out loud.
Quote: @greediron said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ Vikergirl said:
@ Zanary said:
It's hardly news, the modern left screamed about "NO MORE OLD WHITE MEN", and got the oldest prez-elect...ever. They screamed about our police state, yet elected an architect of both the police state and the NDAA, and with him a shameless climber who slept her way (sorry, the married man was her visible patron during her climb. It doesn't get much more blatant) to a position where she fought and withheld evidence...while locking up many people of color and finding her conviction rate for marijuana an infamous matter of humor.
I really didn't think the "main party" bar would get lower than in 2016, where two candidates no-one trusted were somehow the biggest choices. Y'all found a way. Congrats...you f**ked our country in every possible orifice yet again.
That whole she slept her way to the top is such a grotesque talking point from conservatives. She had a relationship with Willie Brown who had been estranged from his wife for a decade. Harris and Brown dated briefly in the mid-1990s, after Brown had separated from his wife in 1981. The innuendo got really ugly during her presidential campaign. It seems as though he was trying to give himself credit for her success.
In regard to Harris’ marijuana conviction record, it's important to distinguish between her six-year tenure as attorney general of California and her seven-years as San Francisco district attorney. A 1500 figure is often cited but that comes from Harris’ time as attorney general rather than as district attorney. Harris did not prosecute such convictions as attorney general, which at the time fell under the jurisdiction of the district attorney.
So sexal misdeeds are off limits for liberals but not for conservatives?
The way the brett kavanaugh was treated in my mind makes everyone fair game.
Let's not forget that Biden was "credibly accused" as well. Much more credible that Kavanaugh's accuser, at least she could remember pertinent details.
Once again you prove to have zero understanding of any current events if it didn’t come from a rightwing blog.
Tara Reade changed her story several times. She has already scammed SEVERAL other people with false allegations throughtout her past. She hooks up with a Trump supporting lawyer and changes her story again. Equating her “testimony” and saying she is just as credible as Kavanaugh’s accuser is fucking laughable. When Blasey has ANY other allegations against men/women in her past then we can talk, but right now that is all Tara Reade who has levied allegations against multiple men and women. Oh, I am sure it’s because she is super hot and flirtatious and not a pathological liar?? Derp.
But considering the source - someone with a track record for pushing conspiracy theories - nobody is surprised.
Tara Reade also lied about her education which nullified her degree. She said that she received her degree from Antioch University but officials from the university said she never graduated. She testified as a government witness for almost a decade. She described herself an expert in the dynamics of domestic violence who had counseled hundreds of victims. Because she lied about her education, defense lawyers were looking to review cases that she testified in. This could put victims of domestic violence in these cases in danger. She has no credibility whatsoever.
|
