Posts: 63
Threads: 63
Joined: Sep 2017
Reputation:
0
Let's see how this plays out . .
Lose election (check)
Deny the results (in process)
Push the states to go to the electors (in process)Fire the summer military-public engagement cockblock in Esper (check)
Have a state consider, leading to push back in the streets (BIGGEST IF)
Send in the military as originally plannedReasoning to stay, political anarchy and the spark of a civil war?
And the assentation of Kash Patel, and Anthony Tata in the pentagon, hope our "well regulated" militias are focused on their constitutional obligations.
less than 70 days left...
Scorched earth is never pretty.
Quote: @BigAl99 said:
And the assentation of Kash Patel, and Anthony Tata in the pentagon, hope our "well regulated" militias are focused on their constitutional obligations.
At least we know we'll have AGR on our side.
Throw out Wray (FBI) and Haspel (CIA) why are we doing this? It's either to open up America to global risks OR creating a path to military engagement IN the US.
I would love to know what GOP and/or TRUMP supporters think about the removal of these widely respected officials for what looks like to be campaign loyalists.
With this security scorched earth strategy, who wins here? Sure as fuck is not this country nor its citizens
Quote: @Skodin said:
Throw out Wray (FBI) and Haspel (CIA) why are we doing this? It's either to open up America to global risks OR creating a path to military engagement IN the US.
I would love to know what GOP and/or TRUMP supporters think about the removal of these widely respected officials for what looks like to be campaign loyalists.
With this security scorched earth strategy, who wins here? Sure as fuck is not this country nor its citizens
The definition of "widely respected officials" may vary.
But who knew you were such a fan of the war machine? One huge reason to like Trump was that he is ending the forever wars. Historic peace deals, bringing the troops home, not starting wars... such a controversial stance.
But probably a big reason some of the GOP dislike him so much as well. War is good business.
Quote: @greediron said:
@ Skodin said:
Throw out Wray (FBI) and Haspel (CIA) why are we doing this? It's either to open up America to global risks OR creating a path to military engagement IN the US.
I would love to know what GOP and/or TRUMP supporters think about the removal of these widely respected officials for what looks like to be campaign loyalists.
With this security scorched earth strategy, who wins here? Sure as fuck is not this country nor its citizens
The definition of "widely respected officials" may vary.
But who knew you were such a fan of the war machine? One huge reason to like Trump was that he is ending the forever wars. Historic peace deals, bringing the troops home, not starting wars... such a controversial stance.
But probably a big reason some of the GOP dislike him so much as well. War is good business.
Yes, Wray and Haspel are widely respected. You know nothing about these positions and what they entail. So stop as if you have an opinion that carries any weight for these two. Citing Breitbart nor 4chan doesn't make you an expert
Here is what is a FACT. Trump had 4 years to remove us from Afghanistan, we are still there to this day. 4,000 plus troops. A lot of talk and no follow through.
When we had a chance to have an outsider in the white house, we end up with this guy who fucked that chance up
Quote: @Skodin said:
@ greediron said:
@ Skodin said:
Throw out Wray (FBI) and Haspel (CIA) why are we doing this? It's either to open up America to global risks OR creating a path to military engagement IN the US.
I would love to know what GOP and/or TRUMP supporters think about the removal of these widely respected officials for what looks like to be campaign loyalists.
With this security scorched earth strategy, who wins here? Sure as fuck is not this country nor its citizens
The definition of "widely respected officials" may vary.
But who knew you were such a fan of the war machine? One huge reason to like Trump was that he is ending the forever wars. Historic peace deals, bringing the troops home, not starting wars... such a controversial stance.
But probably a big reason some of the GOP dislike him so much as well. War is good business.
Yes, Wray and Haspel are widely respected. You know nothing about these positions and what they entail. So stop as if you have an opinion that carries any weight for these two. Citing Breitbart nor 4chan doesn't make you an expert
Here is what is a FACT. Trump had 4 years to remove us from Afghanistan, we are still there to this day. 4,000 plus troops. A lot of talk and no follow through.
When we had a chance to have an outsider in the white house, we end up with this guy who fucked that chance up
But you can act like your opinion carries weight? Whooboy! Get you waders on.
I didn't cite anything. Trump hasn't started any wars and has committed to bringing our troops home. Good for him. If a bureaucrat loses his job over that, to fucking bad.
Quote: @greediron said:
@ Skodin said:
@ greediron said:
@ Skodin said:
Throw out Wray (FBI) and Haspel (CIA) why are we doing this? It's either to open up America to global risks OR creating a path to military engagement IN the US.
I would love to know what GOP and/or TRUMP supporters think about the removal of these widely respected officials for what looks like to be campaign loyalists.
With this security scorched earth strategy, who wins here? Sure as fuck is not this country nor its citizens
The definition of "widely respected officials" may vary.
But who knew you were such a fan of the war machine? One huge reason to like Trump was that he is ending the forever wars. Historic peace deals, bringing the troops home, not starting wars... such a controversial stance.
But probably a big reason some of the GOP dislike him so much as well. War is good business.
Yes, Wray and Haspel are widely respected. You know nothing about these positions and what they entail. So stop as if you have an opinion that carries any weight for these two. Citing Breitbart nor 4chan doesn't make you an expert
Here is what is a FACT. Trump had 4 years to remove us from Afghanistan, we are still there to this day. 4,000 plus troops. A lot of talk and no follow through.
When we had a chance to have an outsider in the white house, we end up with this guy who fucked that chance up
But you can act like your opinion carries weight? Whooboy! Get you waders on.
I didn't cite anything. Trump hasn't started any wars and has committed to bringing our troops home. Good for him. If a bureaucrat loses his job over that, to fucking bad.
At the bold...
His commitment to bringing the troops home does not match what is actually happening but go on... spread the lies
Quote:[...]
But with three months left in his first term, Mr. Trump has not welcomed home the last American soldier from anywhere. While he has withdrawn thousands of troops from Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria, thousands more still risk their lives there — a source of clear frustration for a president hoping to impress voters with unequivocal, unprecedented results
[...]
Source: NYT: Trump’s Campaign Talk of Troop Withdrawals Doesn’t Match Military Reality
While we are talking about his commitment, I'll like to remind you of a few of his commitments:
- Building a wall and Mexico paying for it
- Revealing his Healthcare plan
- An Infrastructure week
- Lowering the National debt (and if I may add eliminating it in 8years)
- Waiting for COVID-19 to disappear
Feel free to point out those that he actually delivered on. He has two months left to be a legitimate President - just thought I also point that out.
And his commitments to:
- stop tweeting if elected, it’s not presidential
- won’t golf or take any vacations because he works sooo hard (LOL!)
- release his tax returns
- lock up Hillary
- to root out voter fraud when 3 million illegals voted in 2016
Promises made, promises ... made.
|
