Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What should Vikings Prioritize in 1st Round?
#1
I'm tired of discussing Kirk Cousins trades that will never actually happen starting to look at draft prospects and know many of you are deeper in it, so would like to hear what makes sense - not just in terms of who will be available in the first, but what might be possible to address later. For example, it seems like we could have good candidates for either DL and OL in the first - but that the OL "dries up" more quickly while there are still options at DL. 

Put another way - should we pass a great DT in round 1 to take an OT because he's the last OT while there are more DTs? Are there other positional areas where "strength in later rounds" should be a big consideration?
Reply

#2
Honestly, give me BPA. Hopefully by the time we pick that player will be either a DE or DT.
Reply

#3
Quote: @PurpleCrush said:
Honestly, give me BPA. Hopefully by the time we pick that player will be either a DE or DT.
I can honestly see an OL @14...I think the last time they drafted an OG 1st it was Randall McDaniel? 

That turned out pretty good. Maybe lightening strikes twice over 40 years???

Oh and don't throw too many tomatoes at me, but a really good WR might be sitting there. 


Reply

#4
Quote: @purplefaithful said:
@PurpleCrush said:
Honestly, give me BPA. Hopefully by the time we pick that player will be either a DE or DT.
I can honestly see an OL @14...I think the last time they drafted an OG 1st it was Randall McDaniel? 

That turned out pretty good. Maybe lightening strikes twice over 40 years???

Oh and don't throw too many tomatoes at me, but a really good WR might be sitting there. 


I guess it all depends on how the board falls. Can't really argue as long as that player is the best available.
Reply

#5
QB
Reply

#6
Edge
Reply

#7
That D was just an embarrassment last season - Defense.
Reply

#8
Trenches.  You should pretty much draft 1 in the top 2 rounds every year. 
Reply

#9
BPA at highest position of relative need.
Reply

#10
Quote: @"BarrNone55" said:
BPA at highest position of relative need.
So.....

No Najee Harris in Vikings purple?  Wink
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
5 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.