San Francisco Looking To Move The #13, #31, Or Both

[JustinTime18™]

Adam Schefter

@AdamSchefter

·1h

49ers fielding calls on both their first-round picks, No. 13 and No. 31 overall, and are open to dealing either or both picks, per league sources. After 31, 49ers not scheduled to pick again until No. 156 in fifth round. No second-, third- and fourth-round picks. Want more picks.I


Rick, just do it. 

[Guest]

@"BarrNone55" said:

Adam Schefter

@AdamSchefter

·1h

49ers fielding calls on both their first-round picks, No. 13 and No. 31 overall, and are open to dealing either or both picks, per league sources. After 31, 49ers not scheduled to pick again until No. 156 in fifth round. No second-, third- and fourth-round picks. Want more picks.I


Rick, just do it. 

I'd be for trading 25 down to 31. But I assume you mean trade up for Kinlaw? I would not be for that. Risk is too high. Cost is too much.

I like Kinlaw but he's too boom or bust for that kind of move. This could be like the Bills trading two 1sts and a 4th to trade up for Sammy Watkins. If they'd stayed put, they could have drafted Mike Evans, OBJ or Brandon Cooks. Or even Aaron Donald. 

[Guest]

Will the Vikings move #25 down to acquire ammo for Trent Williams? 

https://twitter.com/ajtarnow62/status/12...90688?s=20

[Guest]

I'd go the 21, 25, 89, and our 4th for the 13, 31, and a 7th.

Grab Kinlaw at 13, flip the 31 to get a high 2nd and recoup the 4th.

[Guest]

@MaroonBells said:
Will the Vikings move #25 down to acquire ammo for Trent Williams? 

https://twitter.com/ajtarnow62/status/12...90688?s=20

It won't matter if the Redskins aren't willing to be reasonable. Even if they trade down it won't be to overpay Washington. 

[Guest]

@MaroonBells said:
Will the Vikings move #25 down to acquire ammo for Trent Williams? 

https://twitter.com/ajtarnow62/status/12...90688?s=20

I dont know about scheme fit,  but I like the additions made here... even if they didnt take a kicker.

[Guest]

@"BarrNone55" said:
I'd go the 21, 25, 89, and our 4th for the 13, 31, and a 7th.

Grab Kinlaw at 13, flip the 31 to get a high 2nd and recoup the 4th.

I don't think that trade will end up benefiting the Vikings since the player(s) they're targeting will last until #16 if they end up getting past the Browns/Jets/Raiders. The Vikings value in a trade is up into the top 10 or up a few spots to 16/17. But I could see them going full 2013 and trading mid-rounders to get back up into the 1st at #31. 

#58, #89, and #155 is a discount but helps the 49ers fill out their entire draft. Vikings are in the position to do it with their comp 3rd in tow. 

[Guest]

Oakland has #12 and #19, but no second round pick.
It's reasonable to assume Oakland will listen to offers for their picks as well.
If this article is accurate, then both the Raiders 12th pick and the Niners 13th pick will be available, potentially lowering the cost to acquire either. Good news for teams looking to move up!

[Guest]

Atlanta is looking to move up for a CB

[Guest]

@"Geoff Nichols" said:

@MaroonBells said:
Will the Vikings move #25 down to acquire ammo for Trent Williams? 

https://twitter.com/ajtarnow62/status/12...90688?s=20

It won't matter if the Redskins aren't willing to be reasonable. Even if they trade down it won't be to overpay Washington. 

If they were to trade for Trent, I guess it would include a new contract. When does that happen?
 Are they talking with his agent ahead of the draft and have something agreed to, seems it would be pretty tough to negotiate a new deal during the draft.