U.S. Was Beset By Denial & Dysfunction...

[Guest]

LMAO Data Envelopment Analysis.  Not Drug Enforcement Agency.

Multivariate nonparametric regression.

Silly shit.  Give me the fucking data used in peer reviewed journals.  Let’s let real scientists review the data.  

But it doesn’t exist.   They don’t open the data for real scientists for a reason. Because they change data to get the results they want. 

I am no expert - but a wild guess - the changes in the earth’s tilt and orbit, which affects which parts of the earth gets the radiation from the sun, has more to do with climate change than cow farts and plastic straws. 

Play your high school science quizzes.  But please - share their names and their curriculum vitae. 

I will guarantee you those “scientists”, if they exist - are liberal grantees at university with no real math and data backgrounds. 

[Guest]

Well that shit is for production analysis and economics not physical sciences, but you did kinda spell it right and it has numbers, so you get a F+ assuming you spelled your name correctly.

I just asked you some remedial physical science questions and you conflate some unrelated statistical method and unasked question.  How do you differentiate yourself from a box of rocks on your curriculum vitae?

[Guest]

@BigAl99 said:

Well that shit is for production analysis and economics not physical sciences, but you did kinda spell it right and it has numbers, so you get a F+ assuming you spelled your name correctly.

I just asked you some remedial physical science questions and you conflate some unrelated statistical method and unasked question.  How do you differentiate yourself from a box of rocks on your curriculum vitae?

No, you are a clown.  The experts like nuclear physicists - are not experts in empirical data analysis. 

An expert in this field is going to provide me a published journal by Canadian scientists that exposes the climate scientists misapplication of their data analysis.  I will post  it here for your scientific review to tomorrow. 

Real scientists are willing to open their research for cross discipline review.

Just because a biologist or chemist  manipulates data to prove climate change doesn’t mean the analysis is right.

[Guest]

@A1Janitor said:

@BigAl99 said:

Well that shit is for production analysis and economics not physical sciences, but you did kinda spell it right and it has numbers, so you get a F+ assuming you spelled your name correctly.

I just asked you some remedial physical science questions and you conflate some unrelated statistical method and unasked question.  How do you differentiate yourself from a box of rocks on your curriculum vitae?

No, you are a clown.  The experts like nuclear physicists - are not experts in empirical data analysis. 

An expert in this field is going to provide me a published journal by Canadian scientists that exposes the climate scientists misapplication of their data analysis.  I will post  it here for your scientific review to tomorrow. 

Real scientists are willing to open their research for cross discipline review.

Just because a biologist or chemist  manipulates data to prove climate change doesn’t mean the analysis is right.

Give that expert every cent you have for that published journal authored by a Canadian scientist, I am sure it will be a real revelation and worth it.
So just clarify what you were saying about experts like nuclear physicist are not experts in empirical data analysis.  Do you have a clue how physics and empirical data are related. 



   

[Guest]

@A1Janitor said:

@AGRforever said:

@A1Janitor said:
The impeachment was real ... as was the acquittal.

Partisan bullshit.  Let’s see the “whistleblower” and IG transcripts.  All bullshit.  More of the same ... insurance that was started by the corrupt Obama administration before the election.  

OJ’s acquittal was real too. 

Speaking of bullshit!!!  Where's my beer?

Where is your paypal?

you have me on ignore. I can’t send you my email. I can send you a paypal cart if you send me your email. 

[Guest]

Same billionaires who believe you shouldn’t go back to work or travel  unless you carry a digital “medical immunity ID”, find voter ID and border enforcement abhorrent.

[Guest]

You guys are hard to keep up with.  You change topics way too often.  Start new threads if you're going to change the discussion so abruptly.  This is what I imagine ADHD feels like.

[Guest]

@medaille said:
You guys are hard to keep up with.  You change topics way too often.  Start new threads if you're going to change the discussion so abruptly.  This is what I imagine ADHD feels like.

Im just happy when they get on a topic instead of resorting to belittling each others intelligence or other avenues sure to blow up a thread.

[Guest]

@JimmyinSD said:

@medaille said:
You guys are hard to keep up with.  You change topics way too often.  Start new threads if you're going to change the discussion so abruptly.  This is what I imagine ADHD feels like.

Im just happy when they get on a topic instead of resorting to belittling each others intelligence or other avenues sure to blow up a thread.

That was on topic.  

There are actually fruit loops in the general population who call Trump anti-science while pushing gender and climate change hoaxes.  

I am still trying to wrap my head around the “production supply disruption” of hydroxychloroquine.  Approved by FDA years ago, over the counter in Brazil, and we have near 30 MILLION doses ready to go.  And we should believe these guys on such important matters as global doom from changes in weather. 

[Guest]

@A1Janitor said:

@JimmyinSD said:

@medaille said:
You guys are hard to keep up with.  You change topics way too often.  Start new threads if you're going to change the discussion so abruptly.  This is what I imagine ADHD feels like.

Im just happy when they get on a topic instead of resorting to belittling each others intelligence or other avenues sure to blow up a thread.

That was on topic.  Fruit loops call Trump anti-science while pushing gender and climate change hoaxes.  

and then we are back to name calling.... fun while it lasted.

I know you guys are giving in good fun,  but soon somebody else will read it differently and jump in and it will derail the fun for all.   lets stick to the rules of the board and keep the name calling out of our responses... is that good for you two knuckle heads?