Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
One Young, One Old?
#1
For the purpose of this thread let's assume Rhodes gets cut and both Waynes and Alexander find bigger FA deals than what Rick (or I) would offer.

So an early pick will go towards CB. Again. Barf. But also unavoidable. Now, unless Boyd has already progressed enough to become a Starter (unlikely) or Spielman and Zimmer trust Hill to stay clean (way unlikely) Minnesota will also need to sign someone. Someone who won't bust the bank.

Here's some interesting names. Kendall Fuller was a great Slot CB before he got tradedto Kansas City in the Alex Smith deal, where he struggled and ultimately got moved to Safety, which wasn't a good fit at all. He won't cost much and could bounce back fast back in the Slot in a 4-3.

Darqueze Dennard should be at least a little familiar to Zimmer. I think Mike left Cincinnati before he was drafted, IIRC, but would probably have been part of the scouting. Dennard is inconsistent too. That's what you're facing with this Tier of Free Agency. But he's flashed as much as Waynes. 

I expect some big changes to the Secondary next year. Hopefully Hughes moves to the Slot. Put a 1st or 2nd Round pick out there with a guy like Dennard and you will still be fielding a group of CBs that can be the weakness of a Top 10 Defense. Just like Rhodes and Waynes were the Achilles Heel of this years Top 5 Defense.

I can easily see a scenario where there's a run on Tackles and Minnesota has no shot at one at 25. There's a chance it comes down to the 3rd best Corner on the Board vs. the 3rd or 4h best 3T. The dropoff from Brown and Kinlaw to Elliot and Madubuike at al is fairly steep. At least one  of Fulton or Henderson or Hall or Diggs will likely be available at 25 and also be ranked a fair bit higher on the Vikings Big Board than a DT left.

If things fall that way you can't get cute. Rick blocks his wife's number and goes CB in the 1st. Pair him with a veteran for Zimmer to work his reclamation magic on and things night even look better than the Rhodes/Waynes crapfest we just witnessed.

What are some of your FA CB ideas?
Reply

#2
Changes at CB seem inevitable.  And it's hard to predict what the Vikings will do.

All the changes coming makes  the resigning of Harris is imperative. 

Having    Harris and Smith with new CB's would help a lot  IMO.

It'd help  reduce mistakes and speed up  the learning curve of the new players.


Reply

#3
Harris is a must, IMO. First is the safety net at the back end for what will likely be a combination of new and rookie players. Second is the Zone factor. If Mike continues to favor Zone having 2 great Safeties really helps. 

He wasn't calling a lot of Cover 3 as opposed to quarters coverage but that would be an option to consider without any bona fide Press Man Cover guys.

The Ravens used it and had Ed Reed. The Legion of Boom had Thomas and Chancellor. The 9ers have Tartt and Ward. Cover 3 has a track record. One way to exploit it is with passes to the flats and shallow crosses but the Vikings are the best at preventing YAC. And Zimmer hates giving up chunk plays almost as much as losing. Cover 3 is designed to do that.

Retaining Harris and continuing the transition to more Zone-based coverages is much easier to accomplish than finding another sticky Man Coverage CB like Rhodes used to be and having a speedy developing kid like Waynes was. 

I'd go as far as arguing that keeping Anthony and signing one veteran Corner would result in a better performance next season from the Secondary if they stay Zone-based than re-signing any of the Free Agents or using the 1st on one.  HOT TAKE!
Reply

#4
You keep promoting two ideas:
  1.  We can drop in a couple of rookie/FA CBs to do well in Zimmer's scheme
  2. Ant Harris is irreplaceable
So I'll keep saying the same counters:
  1. Players need time to learn to play for Zimmer - rookie CBs especially, and most defensive FAs we brought in (Michael Griffin, Captain Munnerlyn, Datone Jones, Emmanuel Lamur, Trevor Mays, George Iloka, Sheldon Richardson) flopped or needed at least a year to learn. Even Linvalle was just ok his first season here.
  2. Zimmer loves Harrison Smith more than any other player, and he will put almost anyone next to him. Sendejo is back and he can live with him there and train a rookie.
As you know, I put those 2 together and think we will wave buh-bye to Harris if any other team offers him a big contract. I really don't see the Vikings, who did not offer Harris a long-term deal last offseason when they could have had him cheaply, deciding to "buy high" and sign him when his value is highest after a career year. I do see Zimmer seeing Alexander and Waynes as the only FA corners who already know his system and arguing hard to keep them. Spielman doesn't want to pick another DB in the first, and Zim is probably going to push his "all we need is a disruptive 3T to make this defense great" argument and probably get someone like Ross Blacklock.

I guess we'll see how it plays out.
Reply

#5
I don't think we can afford to lose our entire starting nickel package in one offseason. I think the smart thing to do is re-sign Alexander who will come the cheapest and is a solid slot corner. Lock that position up. You have to sink or swim with Hughes next season on the outside and hope he continues to progress a year after the knee injury and I think he will. Rhodes is done here, so that leaves one position to battle over between Hill and likely a draft pick. 
Reply

#6
Brian Poole would be a nice slot corner to sign.
Reply

#7
Sign Mac, let Boyd, Hill and Hughes fight for starting positions. Draft a corner in late rounds (3-4) and maybe another in later rounds as a project. The high draft picks should go to DT, OL and QB. The Sandejo signing was a fall back for Harris. We can groom one while Sandejo holds the spot. I too dont see the vikings giving him the kind of money he will be asking. 
It feels so good being armchair GM
Reply

#8
Quote: @Jor-El said:
You keep promoting two ideas:
  1.  We can drop in a couple of rookie/FA CBs to do well in Zimmer's scheme
  2. Ant Harris is irreplaceable
So I'll keep saying the same counters:
  1. Players need time to learn to play for Zimmer - rookie CBs especially, and most defensive FAs we brought in (Michael Griffin, Captain Munnerlyn, Datone Jones, Emmanuel Lamur, Trevor Mays, George Iloka, Sheldon Richardson) flopped or needed at least a year to learn. Even Linvalle was just ok his first season here.
  2. Zimmer loves Harrison Smith more than any other player, and he will put almost anyone next to him. Sendejo is back and he can live with him there and train a rookie.
As you know, I put those 2 together and think we will wave buh-bye to Harris if any other team offers him a big contract. I really don't see the Vikings, who did not offer Harris a long-term deal last offseason when they could have had him cheaply, deciding to "buy high" and sign him when his value is highest after a career year. I do see Zimmer seeing Alexander and Waynes as the only FA corners who already know his system and arguing hard to keep them. Spielman doesn't want to pick another DB in the first, and Zim is probably going to push his "all we need is a disruptive 3T to make this defense great" argument and probably get someone like Ross Blacklock.

I guess we'll see how it plays out.
I think it's time to put the false narrative of Zimmer's impossible to learn Coverage Schemes to bed. Trae played in 10 games his Rookie season. That might have been the high water mark for a long learning curve cuz Hughes played in every game his Rookie season. In fact, before the injury he played 79% or more snaps in 4 out of 6 games. Shit, UDFA Holton Hill played in all but 2 games as a Rookie. Granted, 4 if those were low snap counts, but 6 of them were 40% of total snaps or more.

And I don't recall Rhodes struggling one iota in Zimmer's rumored difficult system in Mike's first season. 

There's also the fact that he's going with more and more Zone instead of Man. So this isn't even the same system that was allegedly so hard to learn. Which means adding a Rookie and a Veteran can absolutely make an impact next year.

Now on to Harris. He played great in a partial year as a Starter. Signing him long-term after less than 1 full year of Starts is the very thing the vast majority on here complain about Rick doing. So the one time he decides he wants to see more he gets criticized for it? Whatever. 

Harris was an UDFA with medical questions. Minnesota gave him a chance and he proved he belonged. If he signs a huge deal somewhere good for him. But one would think he'd feel the same loyalty as Thielen and be open to a fair deal laden with incentives. Again, 1 and a half years total starting production. A lot of teams will want to see more than that to break the bank for him. We'll find out.

As for the existing CBs, Rhodes was likely the target of Mike's 'Young man's game' comment. That was likely the opening salvo that Zimmer only wants him back if it's on the cheap. Mike also has to be tired of the histrionics, especially Xavier going after Smith.

Alexander is gone. The kid was an Outside Corner at Clemson and miscast as a Slot DB (at least in Mac's mind). He will go to any team willing to give him a shot on the Outside. I wish that were Minnesota but I doubt it.

Waynes makes the most sense for Zimmer to argue to retain. He can blame Trae's struggles this year on Gray or worrying about his contract extension or whatever. The question then becomes does a team want to pony up for a kid that hasn't lived up to his Draft Position? I've read a ton of Free Agency Rankings lately and he isn't getting a lot of love.

So there are a lot of options. Rhodes comes back cheap (I say not that likely), Trae re-signs (50/50). Mac re-signs (not likely). Rick and Mike sign a veteran Tier 2 or Tier 3 Free Agent (highly likely). Rick and Mike spend a 1st, 2nd or 3rd Round pick on a Corner (virtual lead pipe lock).

Harris is also 50/50. If he moves on I see Safety becoming a high priority. Sendejo was brought back because Mike was out of Corners and he couldn't run Big Nickel with Keaese in the doghouse. That was simply familiarity. I see very little chance he factors in as a Starter next season.
Reply

#9
Quote: @supafreak84 said:
I don't think we can afford to lose our entire starting nickel package in one offseason. I think the smart thing to do is re-sign Alexander who will come the cheapest and is a solid slot corner. Lock that position up. You have to sink or swim with Hughes next season on the outside and hope he continues to progress a year after the knee injury and I think he will. Rhodes is done here, so that leaves one position to battle over between Hill and likely a draft pick. 

You and some others have mentioned Hughes needing to start next year. Isn't his vertebrae injury a possible career-ender? Maybe there have been some updates I missed, or maybe he wants to gamble with more serious injury later in life, but is it likely he will play in 2020?
Reply

#10
I must have missed some news on Hughes recovery also.  
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
4 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.