Sondland bombshell: Trump, Giuliani directed the quid pro quo

[Guest]

nt

[Guest]

@A1Janitor said:

@JimmyinSD said:

@A1Janitor said:
It is easy if you know the truth. 

Hats off to them for trying to keep their fake news crap straight.  I don’t know how they do it. 

Same way you do the same...neither of you think yours is crap.

Not really.  There are documents that prove what I say. They rely on unsubstantiated talking points.  

Ah there's documents you have, and I'm the one with unsubstantiated talking points???

LOLOLOLOLOL 

By all means, share with the class.

You keep getting disproven with facts, and post interviews of conspiracy theories and now you're claiming you have documents?

"Julian Assange has proof"
"A whistleblower from NSA claims Ukraine hacked DNC"


Truly hilarious, you think every rumor you read on your dingbat blog sites is fact .... dude you are wholly detached from reality. 

[Guest]

There are documents.  

You just refuse to read them. 

You will accept, for instance, that Schiff is right that the Biden investigation proved no corruption and Ukraine didn’t interfere with election.

But the evidence is clear that is wrong. 

Keep watching.  

[Guest]

@A1Janitor said:
There are documents.  

You just refuse to read them. 

You will accept, for instance, that Schiff is right that the Biden investigation proved no corruption and Ukraine didn’t interfere with election.

But the evidence is clear that is wrong. 

Keep watching.  

Post them, stop deflecting. 

If Biden's proven to be corrupt he deserves punishment. 

And whatever Biden did or didn't do, doesn't change any of Trump's illegal activities. 

But we both know you've already proven you don't care if Republicans do it, you just pretend that when a Dem does it you're fully outraged.

[Guest]

@A1Janitor said:

@JimmyinSD said:

@A1Janitor said:
It is easy if you know the truth. 

Hats off to them for trying to keep their fake news crap straight.  I don’t know how they do it. 

Same way you do the same...neither of you think yours is crap.

Not really.  There are documents that prove what I say. They rely on unsubstantiated talking points.  

there are all kinds of documents.... doesnt make them factual.   no offense, but what makes your documents more factual than those of whom you oppose?  I have seen shit loads of documents that support man made global warming,  but then I have seen an equal amount of documents that throw those same documents into shit.... documents are just paper until they are proven factual and accepted as such by all involved... until then they are just printed theories.

[Guest]

They are not my documents at all.  

For instance - show evidence that Trump colluded  with Russia or committed an impeachable offense.  There is none. There is double hearsay that contradicts known facts. 

As far as Biden and Ukraine involvement:

Read the following.  He attaches the evidence as links:

https://johnsolomonreports.com/responding-to-lt-col-vindman-about-my-ukraine-columns-with-the-facts/

[Guest]

@SFVikeFan said:

@A1Janitor said:
There are documents.  

You just refuse to read them. 

You will accept, for instance, that Schiff is right that the Biden investigation proved no corruption and Ukraine didn’t interfere with election.

But the evidence is clear that is wrong. 

Keep watching.  

Post them, stop deflecting. 

If Biden's proven to be corrupt he deserves punishment. 

And whatever Biden did or didn't do, doesn't change any of Trump's illegal activities. 

But we both know you've already proven you don't care if Republicans do it, you just pretend that when a Dem does it you're fully outraged.

I disagree with the bold.  

I believe the Trump bullshit was created by the CIA and FBI and DOJ and Obama deep staters - it is all fake - and was done to stall this president from exposing the truth about massive corruption - done by both sides.  

These assholes (on both sides) are worth hundreds of millions of dollars on 200k worth of salary. 

Go after them. 

[Guest]

Biased media you say?

K.  Read this whole thread.  

https://twitter.com/Incarcerated_ET/status/1198990090757914625

Why can’t links ever work on this site consistently?

[Guest]

unbelievable 

[Guest]

@A1Janitor said:
They are not my documents at all.  

For instance - show evidence that Trump colluded  with Russia or committed an impeachable offense.  There is none. There is double hearsay that contradicts known facts. 

As far as Biden and Ukraine involvement:

Read the following.  He attaches the evidence as links:

https://johnsolomonreports.com/responding-to-lt-col-vindman-about-my-ukraine-columns-with-the-facts/

Are you fucking serious???

John Solomon????

LMAO 

Wait wait wait ... you talk about unsubstantiated allegations and then you post an article from the one source of all these conspiracy theories to advance the Ukraine narrative and that's your proof??

LOLOLOLOLOL 

I AM FUCKING CRYING HERE!!!

I can post about 10 articles that talk about what an inaccurate dipshit he is and how his theories have been debunked.   And you're posting them as "documents" as proof.

God help us.  You're so fucking gullible it's like a Greek tragedy.   

https://www.votwitter.com/policy-and-pol...ment-trump

During an impeachment hearing Tuesday, Republican Rep. Devin Nunes praised the reporting of a “veteran investigative journalist” whose work had proven to be a “problem for the Democrats” and the media.

That journalist is John Solomon, formerly of the Hill and currently a Fox News contributor. Republicans like Nunes have relied on Solomon’s work during the impeachment inquiry to build the case that Trump was right to be concerned about former Vice President Joe Biden’s actions in Ukraine and those of his son, Hunter Biden, and to argue that the “real” scandal is how the Obama administration tried to get the Ukrainian government to cover up corruption.
But Solomon’s “journalism,” particularly on the subject of Ukraine, has been proven to be false, repeatedly. Solomon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Substantial reporting from outlets including ProPublica and the Daily Beast show that Solomon spread disinformation about Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and the former US Ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch. In his work, he effectively laundered dirt provided to him by Donald Trump’s attorney, Rudy Giuliani, producing articles that directly led to a whistleblower report alleging that Trump, based on Solomon’s false assertions, demanded the Ukrainian government investigate the Bidens or risk losing military aid.
The foremost allegation made by Solomon was published by the Hill in March, when Solomon interviewed the former Ukrainian prosecutor Yuri Lutsenko. In the interview, he accused then-US Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch of giving him a do-not-prosecute list to stop investigations into corruption. The accusation was proved false, and was ultimately recanted by Lutsenko himself — but by then, it was too late.
The falsehood had made it into the right-leaning media ecosystem, where other false allegations surfaced, like that Yovanovitch was anti-Trump and told Ukrainians to ignore him because he would soon be impeached. She was fired from her post in May of this year.