Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Script has really been flipped hasn't it?
#1
Vikings Defense #12 overall in pts allowed (tied with GB btw)

We're winning these days cause of Cook, Cousins, Diggs...

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=2&season=2019&seasonType=REG&role=OPP&d-447263-n=1&d-447263-o=1&d-447263-p=1&statisticCategory=SCORING&conference=ALL&d-447263-s=TOTAL_POINTS_SCORED

Reply

#2
I thought this was gonna be another post about Cousins.  I'm glad that it wasn't- because I was going to post the same thing: the offense is now more reliable than the defense.  If we need to win the game, and have to rely on either the offense or the defense to carry us... I'd rather have the offense out there.  

Times have changed, indeed.
Reply

#3
Reply

#4
Vikings have allowed only 3 rushing TDs in 11 games. That is impressive.
Reply

#5
we are close, very close to being the defense we expect.  

Look at the 6 big pass plays against us:
sutton over rhodes
suttons pass to 81# over Waynes
(2) Cooper sideline grabs
Cobb TD over Mac
Hill deep ball covered by Waynes 

all 6, defenders were in the right position, some, DBs in unreal close coverage with the ball getting through due to inches.  the DBs are there, right there, they just need to make better plays on the ball.  

I think this is a confidence issue, DBs that stop worrying dont grab, dont worry, dont jostle with a WR when the ball is coming.  they make a play on it.  

i think our guys are much closer to
making plays, shutting these passes down. 

i have a strong belief these guys will turn it around as they play a little looser
Reply

#6
I agree.  We finally have a very balanced, respected offense, but now the D is starting to slip.  I now have more confidence in our offense playing well than the D.  That's a first in the "Zim" era for me.  Zim sees it too (saw his PC), but we'll see what they can do about it. 


Reply

#7
Quote: @pumpf said:
I thought this was gonna be another post about Cousins.  I'm glad that it wasn't- because I was going to post the same thing: the offense is now more reliable than the defense.  If we need to win the game, and have to rely on either the offense or the defense to carry us... I'd rather have the offense out there.  

Times have changed, indeed.
Through 11 weeks the Offense has been   more consistent than the defense.  @ GB @ Chi @ KC the Offense hasn't been perfect. I get it.

To me it's odd because since 2014 it's been all defense and trying to find, build, develop the offense.  

This year it seems to be the inverse. 

And if Zim is as good at coaching up defenses as his resume suggests, then I believe he can fix the defense.


FSU is on point IMO  Zimmer needs to change the script and scheme on defense. The Vanilla  defensive look isn't gonna cut it in the weeks ahead.
Reply

#8
Yeah it doesn’t make sense to use season cumulative totals
when we’ve had one extra game over almost every other team.


Vikings offense is 8th in ppg, 9th in
ypg


Vikings defense is 5th in ppg, 15th in
ypg


I think if we can consistently defeat defenses that sellout to stop outside zone runs and bootlegs/rollouts on offense, and just tighten up our defense a little bit and get off the field on 3rd downs we can contend with anyone.
Reply

#9
Has the Vikings' offense caught up to (and maybe even passed) the defense?Defense has clearly been the Vikings’ identity since Mike Zimmer was hired as head coach in 2014. But this season's advances with the ball have created a new dimension.Let’s start here: Defense has clearly been the Vikings’ identity since Mike Zimmer was hired as head coach in 2014. And in the first five years (2014-18), as Zimmer has instilled his philosophy and built up the talent/schemes on that side of the ball, the defense was always ahead of the offense.

To illustrate that point, let’s just look at the Pro Football Focus rankings — Zimmer’s favorite! — on both sides of the ball.
2014: Offense — 21st. Defense — 4th.
2015: Offense — 17th. Defense — 7th.
2016: Offense — 23rd. Defense — 19th.
2017: Offense — 6th. Defense — 4th.
2018: Offense — 14th. Defense — 10th.
The gaps are maybe closer than I thought they would be in the last few years. But I think if you asked anyone what the identity of all those teams was — the way in which the Vikings expected to win — it was defense. And at the end of the day, the defense still ranked ahead of the offense each of those years, at least in the PFF metrics.
But this year is … different. It’s very much like 2017 in that both units have been very good for much of the time, but the rankings are reversed. This year, the Vikings are No. 4 in offense per PFF and No. 6 in defense.
If we shift to Football Outsiders and their DVOA efficiency metric, it’s a similar story: No. 6 in offense, No. 7 in defense.
Prefer less advanced stats? The Vikings are No. 9 in yards per game but just 15th in yards allowed this season (though they are No. 8 in points scored but still fifth in points allowed, a testament to the bend-but-don’t-break nature of this year’s defense).
Also, here’s another stat for you: In Zimmer’s first five seasons, the Vikings were a combined 9-26-1 in games (counting playoffs) when they allowed at least 20 points. During that time, Zimmer was fond of repeating that if the offense could get him 21 points the Vikings would win (and he was often correct).
This season, the Vikings are 4-2 when allowing 20 points or more, including wins each of the last two weeks (28-24 at Dallas, 27-23 over Denver). What’s extra interesting about that is that the Vikings allowed 20+ points in 36 of Zimmer’s first 83 games (counting playoffs), just 43% of the time. This year it’s six of 11 games, or 55%.
Those numbers suggest the offense is being asked to do more this season and that it’s up for the challenge.
If we further want to split hairs, you can argue the Vikings’ offense is ahead of the defense this year because it has better balance between run and pass.
Per FBO, the Vikings are No. 8 in both passing and rushing offensive efficiency this year; on defense, they are No. 5 against the run but a mediocre No. 14 vs. the pass.
*I think there’s at least enough statistical evidence to say the Vikings’ offense has caught up to the defense — and perhaps that shouldn’t be surprising since the Vikings have invested more heavily on that side of the ball in recent years.
In 2014-16, Zimmer’s first three seasons, the Vikings had a total of nine picks in the first three rounds of the draft. Six of those were used on defensive players, and five of them still play key roles: Anthony Barr, Eric Kendricks, Danielle Hunter, Trae Waynes, and Mackensie Alexander.
In 2017-19, the Vikings have used six of their seven picks in the top three rounds on offensive players, all of whom are contributing this season: Dalvin Cook, Pat Elflein, Brian O’Neill, Garrett Bradbury, Irv Smith Jr. and Alexander Mattison.
There’s also the matter of the $84 million investment in quarterback Kirk Cousins, which is a big part of this year’s offensive story.
*But is the offense better than the defense? I’m not quite ready to say that yet, and maybe it still comes down to trust.
I’ve seen the defense come up big more often in the past than I’ve seen the offense do it, and that’s still my expectation (right or wrong). If there was one play from the 3 yard line in the closing seconds, a touchdown wins the game, would you rather have the Vikings’ offense trying to score or the defense trying to make a stop?
I still think I like the defense more in that situation — whether that’s the recency bias of seeing them do it against Denver or six seasons of seeing Zimmers defenses, that’s my answer.
But if you’re a Vikings fan, you have to feel good about the balance on this team. Teams are most dangerous when they can win in a variety of ways, particularly in the playoffs. I can picture the Vikings winning 16-13 or 30-27. They finally have a team that can do both.
http://www.startribune.com/has-the-vikin...565225152/

Reply

#10
Great post, purplefaithful!  And balance is a "normal" ingredient for Super Bowl teams... so that's good news, too.  I don't know how many teams reach the Super Bowl by being great on one side of the ball... but terrible on the other.  But I'm pretty sure that teams can reach the big game by being "pretty good" (above average)- if they are that on both sides of the ball.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.