01-22-2018, 04:11 AM
This wasn't on Keenum or Shurmur. ..there was room for improvement but our D DID nothing tonight to justify all those first round picks.
ESPN: 'Vikings cannot let Keenum walk after this season'
|
01-22-2018, 04:11 AM
This wasn't on Keenum or Shurmur. ..there was room for improvement but our D DID nothing tonight to justify all those first round picks.
01-22-2018, 04:27 AM
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:Well, the defense sucked, but Keenum and Shurmur definitely played their part. The pick 6 was a horrible decision even if he would have got it off cleanly. The throw would have had to have been perfect to be caught in bounds and it was very likely to be intercepted. Case's fumble was directly caused by a poor play design or maybe a bad protection call. You want your blocking TE to run across your whole OLine and then block their edge rusher who's coming unblocked? Those 2 negative plays were the cause of 7 points directly, plus a FG or TD that we didn't get, so a 10-14 point swing plus a huge momentum change.
01-22-2018, 04:32 AM
Quote: @medaille said:
01-22-2018, 04:55 AM
Quote: @"Geoff Nichols" said:
01-22-2018, 03:27 PM
Quote: @Norse said:I disagree with you here. The main reason I think Case is out is that he DOESN’T fit with what Zimmer wants. I think fundamentally, Zimmer is a conservative coach. He wants his defense to keep the score low, and his offense to be productive without taking many risks. Case is fundamentally a guy who loves to take risks. They put a lot of effort into getting him to be less risky, but I’m not sure they can get rid of it. I think it’s an innate part of him. With Case, Bradford, and Bridgewater being as close in talent level as they are, I just don’t see them sticking with a guy who fundamentally goes against the core of what Zimmer is. I think the biggest aspect of the offseason is to continue to build our OLine and OLine depth such that whichever QB we end up with will succeed. I see a lot of people suggesting that Case’s mobility was key in avoiding a lot of the pressure that the OLine let through. That’s probably true, but you shouldn’t make a long term decision under the assumption that the OLine is going to suck.
01-22-2018, 03:52 PM
Quote: @medaille said:
01-22-2018, 07:41 PM
Quote: @SFVikingFan said:I don’t disagree with you. I think it was definitely a breath of fresh air to see someone slinging the ball all around the field (except to our X receiver J ), but I’m just predicting what I think Zimmer is thinking. I also don’t think Zimmers desired offense is a chickenshit offense. I think we just got sideswiped by not having enough talent on offense the last couple years prior to this year and we got shoehorned into very one-dimensional offenses. Bridgewater in 2015 had a ground game, but the OLine couldn’t pass block and the WRs sucked outside of Diggs as a rookie, so we abandoned the passing game. Bradford in 2016 had an OLine that sucked at both pass blocking and run blocking, but he had Diggs and Theilen as adequate receivers and we abandoned the deep passing game and the running game. With a decent OLine I would expect that we would have a more dynamic offense regardless of QB. |
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |