Quote: @AGRforever said:
@ A1Janitor said:
The impeachment was real ... as was the acquittal.
Partisan bullshit. Let’s see the “whistleblower” and IG transcripts. All bullshit. More of the same ... insurance that was started by the corrupt Obama administration before the election.
OJ’s acquittal was real too.
Speaking of bullshit!!! Where's my beer?
Where is your paypal?
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@"BarrNone55" said:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/coronavir...story.html
“The lack of immune protection or an existing cure or vaccine would leave Americans defenseless in the case of a full-blown coronavirus outbreak on U.S. soil,” Navarro’s memo said. “This lack of protection elevates the risk of the coronavirus evolving into a full-blown pandemic, imperiling the lives of millions of Americans.”
Dated Jan. 29, it came during a period when Trump was playing down the risks to the United States, and he would later go on to say that no one could have predicted such a devastating outcome.
Trump was mostly likely working from the flawed information he was receiving from the WHO at that time, even though he was proactive in trying to limit travel and even banned it with China... how does the story line still go that while his opposition was focused on his impeachment, and doing nothing themselves to prepare for this epidemic, Trump was working on it, even if he was at times working with bad information.
the donald does plenty of shit that is worthy of skewering him over, this isnt one of them, at least not to the extent that he is catching shit. He was ahead of most media and other elected officials on this and has been since day 1. Those trying to focus the blame for this mess on him just come across as petty and agenda driven IMO. no offense Barr, but this is pretty limited in my eyes... of course I am still of the opinion that nobody should be blamed except those that are ignoring the warnings and still acting like morons in exposing the public and that doesnt seem to be linked to any particular political party.
That's where you loose me, Trump has never demonstrated any analytic capability, made no difference what the information said, how is he gonna look good to his base is all it came down to. His capability is pure transactional, how do I win this conversation, read his book. How he goes from understating the death toll in February to today's narrative that if he hadn't acted so soon there would be millions dead. His logic is keeping things in chaos, keep discussion off balance and prevent any analysis, Roy Coahn tactic.
Quote: @BigAl99 said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@"BarrNone55" said:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/coronavir...story.html
“The lack of immune protection or an existing cure or vaccine would leave Americans defenseless in the case of a full-blown coronavirus outbreak on U.S. soil,” Navarro’s memo said. “This lack of protection elevates the risk of the coronavirus evolving into a full-blown pandemic, imperiling the lives of millions of Americans.”
Dated Jan. 29, it came during a period when Trump was playing down the risks to the United States, and he would later go on to say that no one could have predicted such a devastating outcome.
Trump was mostly likely working from the flawed information he was receiving from the WHO at that time, even though he was proactive in trying to limit travel and even banned it with China... how does the story line still go that while his opposition was focused on his impeachment, and doing nothing themselves to prepare for this epidemic, Trump was working on it, even if he was at times working with bad information.
the donald does plenty of shit that is worthy of skewering him over, this isnt one of them, at least not to the extent that he is catching shit. He was ahead of most media and other elected officials on this and has been since day 1. Those trying to focus the blame for this mess on him just come across as petty and agenda driven IMO. no offense Barr, but this is pretty limited in my eyes... of course I am still of the opinion that nobody should be blamed except those that are ignoring the warnings and still acting like morons in exposing the public and that doesnt seem to be linked to any particular political party.
That's where you loose me, Trump has never demonstrated any analytic capability, made no difference what the information said, how is he gonna look good to his base. His capability is pure transactional, how do I win this conversation, read his book. How he goes from understating the death toll in February to today's narrative that if he hadn't acted so soon there would be millions dead. His logic is keeping things in chaos, keep discussion off balance and prevent any analysis, Roy Coahn tactic.
he was making moves on this thing before it was on anybody else's radar here in the US and he gets blasted for his efforts, he tries to pass on what the WHO is selling and he gets blasted when it turns out the experts were wrong, but then he also gets ripped for going against what some experts are saying... he is is all over the place, but it wouldnt matter what he did, some people are just going to shoot first and figure out why later anyway.
I think the reason that some democrats hate him so much is because he is a moving target, they usually like their prey to just stand still and wait to get shot.
he has made mistakes in this, but with the cards that he has been dealt and the rest of the players at the table... I think hes playing the hands pretty well.
I just don't buy on to your narrative, it don't make sense to me, from what i know. I know he has a disdain for science and academic discourse is a waste. I look at his background, and all I see is a failed real estate developer, successful self promoter. A petty soul that can't take what he deals out, remember the birther crap he funded.
Hahaha If anyone questions the climate change hoaxers, they are labeled as anti-science.
Academic discourse = leftist drivel.
Yet tell someone how many genders there are, they ignore science.
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
Hahaha If anyone questions the climate change hoaxers, they are labeled as anti-science.
No, just idiots.
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
@ A1Janitor said:
Hahaha If anyone questions the climate change hoaxers, they are labeled as anti-science.
No, just idiots.
Yeah. Then maybe the scientists will stop changing the data to achieve what desired result they want.
Man made my ass.
Quote: @A1Janitor said:
@ MaroonBells said:
@ A1Janitor said:
Hahaha If anyone questions the climate change hoaxers, they are labeled as anti-science.
No, just idiots.
Yeah. Then maybe the scientists will stop changing the data to achieve what desired result they want.
Man made my ass.
In your world how does the sun heat the earth, or does it?
Quote: @BigAl99 said:
@ A1Janitor said:
@ MaroonBells said:
@ A1Janitor said:
Hahaha If anyone questions the climate change hoaxers, they are labeled as anti-science.
No, just idiots.
Yeah. Then maybe the scientists will stop changing the data to achieve what desired result they want.
Man made my ass.
In your world how does the sun heat the earth, or does it?
Not by man.
|
