Quote: @MaroonBells said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ greediron said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ mgobluevikes said:
To burn through the good will. If this defense isn't rated in the low 20's and we finish behind the Lions in the division this year, his seat is should be red hot. He looks insanely out of touch. The organization doesn't look like it knows where it's going. Like Cleveland of the 80's bad.
His team went 13-4. He hired a great coach. He’s going to resign the best WR in the league. He made the 2nd best trade in Viking history when he got Hock
KAM hasn’t looked great in April to FANS, but he isn’t going anywhere.
His team? Hardly, his contributions to the team last year were largely non existent with the exception of Hock, who only joined the team mid season. We aren't going to see kams team until this year at the soonest. 13-4 was largely still with ricks players.
I find it hilarious that we are yearning for the halcyon days of Rick trading down in the 4-5th rounds for extra 7th rounders.
lol, this.
LOL nope, we are just tired of trade downs to the bottom of every round which is a Kwesi special at this point, drafting lower ranked players, and in the process getting regularly fleeced by opposing GM's in said trade downs, some within our own division! I'd happily take Rick's 7th round bullshit over getting bent over the kitchen table in an asinine trade down with, oh say the Lions...
If you look at the players taken between 87 and 102, where we took Blackmon, there was only one player I liked in that range. Michael Wilson, the WR out of Stanford. But we already had a WR. You might have some others. But after we took Addison, this was almost certainly going to be a corner and no corner was taken in that range.
You want to argue about the value of Blackmon at 102, that's fine. I'd agree that it was a reach according to consensus. But so was Alexander Mattison, who was taken at the exact same spot, 102. He's been a better back than all four of the backs taken ahead of him in the 3rd round.
We'll have to wait to see how Blackmon plays compared to higher ranked corners taken later, but Brian Flores knows the kind of corner he needs and it was obviously not any of the others. Could he be wrong? Of course. But so can you.
I'm shocked we didn't take Kelee Ringo there. I know some thought him to be a little stiff and could get handsy at times, but the kid is 20, coachable, and I thought his physical skillset was maybe the best in this class at the corner position. Textbook press, man coverage corner.
Quote: @supafreak84 said:
@ MaroonBells said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ greediron said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ mgobluevikes said:
To burn through the good will. If this defense isn't rated in the low 20's and we finish behind the Lions in the division this year, his seat is should be red hot. He looks insanely out of touch. The organization doesn't look like it knows where it's going. Like Cleveland of the 80's bad.
His team went 13-4. He hired a great coach. He’s going to resign the best WR in the league. He made the 2nd best trade in Viking history when he got Hock
KAM hasn’t looked great in April to FANS, but he isn’t going anywhere.
His team? Hardly, his contributions to the team last year were largely non existent with the exception of Hock, who only joined the team mid season. We aren't going to see kams team until this year at the soonest. 13-4 was largely still with ricks players.
I find it hilarious that we are yearning for the halcyon days of Rick trading down in the 4-5th rounds for extra 7th rounders.
lol, this.
LOL nope, we are just tired of trade downs to the bottom of every round which is a Kwesi special at this point, drafting lower ranked players, and in the process getting regularly fleeced by opposing GM's in said trade downs, some within our own division! I'd happily take Rick's 7th round bullshit over getting bent over the kitchen table in an asinine trade down with, oh say the Lions...
If you look at the players taken between 87 and 102, where we took Blackmon, there was only one player I liked in that range. Michael Wilson, the WR out of Stanford. But we already had a WR. You might have some others. But after we took Addison, this was almost certainly going to be a corner and no corner was taken in that range.
You want to argue about the value of Blackmon at 102, that's fine. I'd agree that it was a reach according to consensus. But so was Alexander Mattison, who was taken at the exact same spot, 102. He's been a better back than all four of the backs taken ahead of him in the 3rd round.
We'll have to wait to see how Blackmon plays compared to higher ranked corners taken later, but Brian Flores knows the kind of corner he needs and it was obviously not any of the others. Could he be wrong? Of course. But so can you.
I'm shocked we didn't take Kelee Ringo there. I know some thought him to be a little stiff and could get handsy at times, but the kid is 20, coachable, and I thought his physical skillset was maybe the best in this class at the corner position. Textbook press, man coverage corner.
There was a rumor he was red flagged for medical. Don't know why he dropped, but like Mattison, we'll just have to see how he plays compared to those taken around him. We certainly weren't the only team who passed on him. Hell, the Raiders took Jakorian Bennett ahead of Ringo. I think maybe more than any other position, corners have to fit what you do.
I like that Blackmon graded top 5 in both zone and man. The only other CB to do that was Devon Witherspoon.
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ MaroonBells said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ greediron said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ mgobluevikes said:
To burn through the good will. If this defense isn't rated in the low 20's and we finish behind the Lions in the division this year, his seat is should be red hot. He looks insanely out of touch. The organization doesn't look like it knows where it's going. Like Cleveland of the 80's bad.
His team went 13-4. He hired a great coach. He’s going to resign the best WR in the league. He made the 2nd best trade in Viking history when he got Hock
KAM hasn’t looked great in April to FANS, but he isn’t going anywhere.
His team? Hardly, his contributions to the team last year were largely non existent with the exception of Hock, who only joined the team mid season. We aren't going to see kams team until this year at the soonest. 13-4 was largely still with ricks players.
I find it hilarious that we are yearning for the halcyon days of Rick trading down in the 4-5th rounds for extra 7th rounders.
lol, this.
LOL nope, we are just tired of trade downs to the bottom of every round which is a Kwesi special at this point, drafting lower ranked players, and in the process getting regularly fleeced by opposing GM's in said trade downs, some within our own division! I'd happily take Rick's 7th round bullshit over getting bent over the kitchen table in an asinine trade down with, oh say the Lions...
If you look at the players taken between 87 and 102, where we took Blackmon, there was only one player I liked in that range. Michael Wilson, the WR out of Stanford. But we already had a WR. You might have some others. But after we took Addison, this was almost certainly going to be a corner and no corner was taken in that range.
You want to argue about the value of Blackmon at 102, that's fine. I'd agree that it was a reach according to consensus. But so was Alexander Mattison, who was taken at the exact same spot, 102. He's been a better back than all four of the backs taken ahead of him in the 3rd round.
We'll have to wait to see how Blackmon plays compared to higher ranked corners taken later, but Brian Flores knows the kind of corner he needs and it was obviously not any of the others. Could he be wrong? Of course. But so can you.
I'm shocked we didn't take Kelee Ringo there. I know some thought him to be a little stiff and could get handsy at times, but the kid is 20, coachable, and I thought his physical skillset was maybe the best in this class at the corner position. Textbook press, man coverage corner.
There was a rumor he was red flagged for medical. Don't know why he dropped, but like Mattison, we'll just have to see how he plays compared to those taken around him. We certainly weren't the only team who passed on him. Hell, the Raiders took Jakorian Bennett ahead of Ringo. I think maybe more than any other position, corners have to fit what you do.
I like that Blackmon graded top 5 in both zone and man. The only other CB to do that was Devon Witherspoon.
This was one of those examples where I didn't have an issue with the player selected (Blackmon) but would have preferred a different player (Ringo). It sucks he went to the Eagles too...
Quote: @StickyBun said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ greediron said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ mgobluevikes said:
To burn through the good will. If this defense isn't rated in the low 20's and we finish behind the Lions in the division this year, his seat is should be red hot. He looks insanely out of touch. The organization doesn't look like it knows where it's going. Like Cleveland of the 80's bad.
His team went 13-4. He hired a great coach. He’s going to resign the best WR in the league. He made the 2nd best trade in Viking history when he got Hock
KAM hasn’t looked great in April to FANS, but he isn’t going anywhere.
His team? Hardly, his contributions to the team last year were largely non existent with the exception of Hock, who only joined the team mid season. We aren't going to see kams team until this year at the soonest. 13-4 was largely still with ricks players.
I find it hilarious that we are yearning for the halcyon days of Rick trading down in the 4-5th rounds for extra 7th rounders.
lol, this.
LOL nope, we are just tired of trade downs to the bottom of every round which is a Kwesi special at this point, drafting lower ranked players, and in the process getting regularly fleeced by opposing GM's in said trade downs, some within our own division! I'd happily take Rick's 7th round bullshit over getting bent over the kitchen table in an asinine trade down with, oh say the Lions...
Ok. I think we've got your take, ad nauseam. I'm working off a 13 win season, that's my barometer. Yours is conjecture and personal opinion. We can talk when Minnesota wins 7 games this year. Point being: not saying everything is perfect, but you sound like the type of fan that's not going to be talked out of being negative. Plenty of those around. I'd get it if the team sucked ass last year, but that wasn't the case.
'Regularly fleeced' and 'trade downs to the bottom of every round' is exaggeration and hyperbole. The dude's been doing it FOR TWO YEARs. So tell me, who's overreacting? You can have your opinion for sure, but its not logical.
That's right, TWO YEARS and how many times has he traded way down in rounds for below market value (or arguably so)? That's just fact, the guy has not been good at maximizing draft value or drafting players. You want to crown his ass along with a handful of others on a fluky 13 win season where his impact was minimal, then that's on you. He was a sketchy hire, and nothing he has done up to this point has done anything to change that perception to a whole hell of a lot of people. Nobody knows what the plan is with this roster except to continue tinkering and hope lightning strikes at some point while a bunch of other teams have rebuilt and stacked their rosters adding young talent for the long term.
Quote: @supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ greediron said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ mgobluevikes said:
To burn through the good will. If this defense isn't rated in the low 20's and we finish behind the Lions in the division this year, his seat is should be red hot. He looks insanely out of touch. The organization doesn't look like it knows where it's going. Like Cleveland of the 80's bad.
His team went 13-4. He hired a great coach. He’s going to resign the best WR in the league. He made the 2nd best trade in Viking history when he got Hock
KAM hasn’t looked great in April to FANS, but he isn’t going anywhere.
His team? Hardly, his contributions to the team last year were largely non existent with the exception of Hock, who only joined the team mid season. We aren't going to see kams team until this year at the soonest. 13-4 was largely still with ricks players.
I find it hilarious that we are yearning for the halcyon days of Rick trading down in the 4-5th rounds for extra 7th rounders.
lol, this.
LOL nope, we are just tired of trade downs to the bottom of every round which is a Kwesi special at this point, drafting lower ranked players, and in the process getting regularly fleeced by opposing GM's in said trade downs, some within our own division! I'd happily take Rick's 7th round bullshit over getting bent over the kitchen table in an asinine trade down with, oh say the Lions...
Ok. I think we've got your take, ad nauseam. I'm working off a 13 win season, that's my barometer. Yours is conjecture and personal opinion. We can talk when Minnesota wins 7 games this year. Point being: not saying everything is perfect, but you sound like the type of fan that's not going to be talked out of being negative. Plenty of those around. I'd get it if the team sucked ass last year, but that wasn't the case.
'Regularly fleeced' and 'trade downs to the bottom of every round' is exaggeration and hyperbole. The dude's been doing it FOR TWO YEARs. So tell me, who's overreacting? You can have your opinion for sure, but its not logical.
That's right, TWO YEARS and how many times has he traded way down in rounds for below market value (or arguably so)? That's just fact, the guy has not been good at maximizing draft value or drafting players. You want to crown his ass along with a handful of others on a fluky 13 win season where his impact was minimal, then that's on you. He was a sketchy hire, and nothing he has done up to this point has done anything to change that perception to a whole hell of a lot of people. Nobody knows what the plan is with this roster except to continue tinkering and hope lightning strikes at some point while a bunch of other teams have rebuilt and stacked their rosters adding young talent for the long term.
Quote: @supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ greediron said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ AGRforever said:
@ mgobluevikes said:
To burn through the good will. If this defense isn't rated in the low 20's and we finish behind the Lions in the division this year, his seat is should be red hot. He looks insanely out of touch. The organization doesn't look like it knows where it's going. Like Cleveland of the 80's bad.
His team went 13-4. He hired a great coach. He’s going to resign the best WR in the league. He made the 2nd best trade in Viking history when he got Hock
KAM hasn’t looked great in April to FANS, but he isn’t going anywhere.
His team? Hardly, his contributions to the team last year were largely non existent with the exception of Hock, who only joined the team mid season. We aren't going to see kams team until this year at the soonest. 13-4 was largely still with ricks players.
I find it hilarious that we are yearning for the halcyon days of Rick trading down in the 4-5th rounds for extra 7th rounders.
lol, this.
LOL nope, we are just tired of trade downs to the bottom of every round which is a Kwesi special at this point, drafting lower ranked players, and in the process getting regularly fleeced by opposing GM's in said trade downs, some within our own division! I'd happily take Rick's 7th round bullshit over getting bent over the kitchen table in an asinine trade down with, oh say the Lions...
Ok. I think we've got your take, ad nauseam. I'm working off a 13 win season, that's my barometer. Yours is conjecture and personal opinion. We can talk when Minnesota wins 7 games this year. Point being: not saying everything is perfect, but you sound like the type of fan that's not going to be talked out of being negative. Plenty of those around. I'd get it if the team sucked ass last year, but that wasn't the case.
'Regularly fleeced' and 'trade downs to the bottom of every round' is exaggeration and hyperbole. The dude's been doing it FOR TWO YEARs. So tell me, who's overreacting? You can have your opinion for sure, but its not logical.
That's right, TWO YEARS and how many times has he traded way down in rounds for below market value (or arguably so)? That's just fact, the guy has not been good at maximizing draft value or drafting players. You want to crown his ass along with a handful of others on a fluky 13 win season where his impact was minimal, then that's on you. He was a sketchy hire, and nothing he has done up to this point has done anything to change that perception to a whole hell of a lot of people. Nobody knows what the plan is with this roster except to continue tinkering and hope lightning strikes at some point while a bunch of other teams have rebuilt and stacked their rosters adding young talent for the long term.
Addison is the best pick he's had so far under his tenure as GM. The rest are all incomplete crap shoots. No need to argue about that. We will see how things play this season and what kind of steps the defense can take under Flores.
Quote: @supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ supafreak84 said:
Let's face it, Kwesi was an outside the box, taking a chance kind of hire in the first place. I'm just not a believer in handing the keys over to a guy who wasn't a former player or has a scouting background and I was not in favor of his hire. His first offseason was an almost total bust between signing guys who made little to no impact on a defense that was one of the worst units in the league from a talent standpoint or making trades that didn't work out (Reagor, Blacklock). Zadarius was good for half a season, got injured which is his M.O., and is on his way out the door here at some point. Kwesi was absolutely fleeced repeatedly in draft value in his first draft and the players he selected made almost zero impact, unless we count Ingram's season of average to below average play. If you want to give him credit for hiring KOC, cool, but you also have to acknowledge the decision to bring in Ed Donatell to run the defense and oversee the total transition to a new scheme was just one of theeee worst decisions ever and completely predictable to be the disaster that it was. I thought Kwesi really needed a big draft to overcome the shit show of last offseason and I was okay with this draft. I would have taken some different players at certain spots, but that doesn't mean I didn't like the players that we did select. The bottom line for me is that I just do not agree with the way they do the business of roster building and I'm not sure what the long-term vision is. Kwesi has an uphill battle in trying to manage the Wilf's expectations while trying to keep the roster talented enough to contend. I don't know. This upcoming year is going to be very telling in where this franchise is headed in the future.
I don't think this is the year to tell: next year is the year to know. Still working through some previous cap limitations.
13 wins and a NFCN title: never gets talked about by the KAM naysayers. The stuff some of you focus on is very interesting....I guess that's the nice way to put it, lol.
It doesn't get talked about because his roster contributions last season outside of the mid-season Hockenson trade were nonexistent. We got nothing from his draft unless you want to count Ingram, whom at one point of the season was the lowest rated guard in the league. His trades were busts and nobody cares about 13 wins and a north title when we got bounced (and predictably so) at home in the first round of the playoffs. My neighbor Bob, who is a mailman, could have navigated the same type of offseason. For someone who is allegedly some whizz kid and smarter than everyone else, I have yet to see it. That's why I say he needed a big draft to erase some of the stink in his handling of last offseason. Did it happen? I don't know. I thought it was an average draft which will depend a ton on Addison and what kind of impact he can make.
Hard to get a "big" draft out of our weak batch of picks in a really weak draft class . Still, the proclivity for smallish guys is a head scratcher to me and I would not take a WR2 with a first round pick.
That said, nothing he's done so far has me thinking we're headed up the on-ramp to a title run. The football-by-committee approach of ownership probably precludes that regardless of who the g.m. is. We're supposed to settle for good but never great and keep the revenue flowing like dutiful fans.
Allowing Harbaugh to leave Minnesota without a signed deal was a mistake. KAM has a lot to prove still
Quote: @comet52 said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ supafreak84 said:
Let's face it, Kwesi was an outside the box, taking a chance kind of hire in the first place. I'm just not a believer in handing the keys over to a guy who wasn't a former player or has a scouting background and I was not in favor of his hire. His first offseason was an almost total bust between signing guys who made little to no impact on a defense that was one of the worst units in the league from a talent standpoint or making trades that didn't work out (Reagor, Blacklock). Zadarius was good for half a season, got injured which is his M.O., and is on his way out the door here at some point. Kwesi was absolutely fleeced repeatedly in draft value in his first draft and the players he selected made almost zero impact, unless we count Ingram's season of average to below average play. If you want to give him credit for hiring KOC, cool, but you also have to acknowledge the decision to bring in Ed Donatell to run the defense and oversee the total transition to a new scheme was just one of theeee worst decisions ever and completely predictable to be the disaster that it was. I thought Kwesi really needed a big draft to overcome the shit show of last offseason and I was okay with this draft. I would have taken some different players at certain spots, but that doesn't mean I didn't like the players that we did select. The bottom line for me is that I just do not agree with the way they do the business of roster building and I'm not sure what the long-term vision is. Kwesi has an uphill battle in trying to manage the Wilf's expectations while trying to keep the roster talented enough to contend. I don't know. This upcoming year is going to be very telling in where this franchise is headed in the future.
I don't think this is the year to tell: next year is the year to know. Still working through some previous cap limitations.
13 wins and a NFCN title: never gets talked about by the KAM naysayers. The stuff some of you focus on is very interesting....I guess that's the nice way to put it, lol.
It doesn't get talked about because his roster contributions last season outside of the mid-season Hockenson trade were nonexistent. We got nothing from his draft unless you want to count Ingram, whom at one point of the season was the lowest rated guard in the league. His trades were busts and nobody cares about 13 wins and a north title when we got bounced (and predictably so) at home in the first round of the playoffs. My neighbor Bob, who is a mailman, could have navigated the same type of offseason. For someone who is allegedly some whizz kid and smarter than everyone else, I have yet to see it. That's why I say he needed a big draft to erase some of the stink in his handling of last offseason. Did it happen? I don't know. I thought it was an average draft which will depend a ton on Addison and what kind of impact he can make.
Hard to get a "big" draft out of our weak batch of picks in a really weak draft class . Still, the proclivity for smallish guys is a head scratcher to me and I would not take a WR2 with a first round pick.
That said, nothing he's done so far has me thinking we're headed up the on-ramp to a title run. The football-by-committee approach of ownership probably precludes that regardless of who the g.m. is. We're supposed to settle for good but never great and keep the revenue flowing like dutiful fans.
I was listening to NFL radio this morning with Soloman Wilcots and former Patriot RB James White. The topic was naming their top 5 teams in each conference post draft. When it got to the NFC, they both had the same teams, just in a slightly different order; Eagles, Seahawks, Cowboys, 49ers and Lions. While both liked the Addison selection, neither liked the Vikings offseason. I tend to concur with their projection and would probably throw the Giants in there ahead of the Vikings as well.
So all this once again leads me to....what are we doing? I don't think the Vikings and Kwesi know what they are doing. We are stuck somewhere between trying to appease the expectations of ownership and blowing up the roster on a reset. It's an awful position to be in and I think we are just trying to stay competitive while shuffling the cap and hoping to catch lightning in a bottle at some point.
Quote: @supafreak84 said:
@ comet52 said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ supafreak84 said:
Let's face it, Kwesi was an outside the box, taking a chance kind of hire in the first place. I'm just not a believer in handing the keys over to a guy who wasn't a former player or has a scouting background and I was not in favor of his hire. His first offseason was an almost total bust between signing guys who made little to no impact on a defense that was one of the worst units in the league from a talent standpoint or making trades that didn't work out (Reagor, Blacklock). Zadarius was good for half a season, got injured which is his M.O., and is on his way out the door here at some point. Kwesi was absolutely fleeced repeatedly in draft value in his first draft and the players he selected made almost zero impact, unless we count Ingram's season of average to below average play. If you want to give him credit for hiring KOC, cool, but you also have to acknowledge the decision to bring in Ed Donatell to run the defense and oversee the total transition to a new scheme was just one of theeee worst decisions ever and completely predictable to be the disaster that it was. I thought Kwesi really needed a big draft to overcome the shit show of last offseason and I was okay with this draft. I would have taken some different players at certain spots, but that doesn't mean I didn't like the players that we did select. The bottom line for me is that I just do not agree with the way they do the business of roster building and I'm not sure what the long-term vision is. Kwesi has an uphill battle in trying to manage the Wilf's expectations while trying to keep the roster talented enough to contend. I don't know. This upcoming year is going to be very telling in where this franchise is headed in the future.
I don't think this is the year to tell: next year is the year to know. Still working through some previous cap limitations.
13 wins and a NFCN title: never gets talked about by the KAM naysayers. The stuff some of you focus on is very interesting....I guess that's the nice way to put it, lol.
It doesn't get talked about because his roster contributions last season outside of the mid-season Hockenson trade were nonexistent. We got nothing from his draft unless you want to count Ingram, whom at one point of the season was the lowest rated guard in the league. His trades were busts and nobody cares about 13 wins and a north title when we got bounced (and predictably so) at home in the first round of the playoffs. My neighbor Bob, who is a mailman, could have navigated the same type of offseason. For someone who is allegedly some whizz kid and smarter than everyone else, I have yet to see it. That's why I say he needed a big draft to erase some of the stink in his handling of last offseason. Did it happen? I don't know. I thought it was an average draft which will depend a ton on Addison and what kind of impact he can make.
Hard to get a "big" draft out of our weak batch of picks in a really weak draft class . Still, the proclivity for smallish guys is a head scratcher to me and I would not take a WR2 with a first round pick.
That said, nothing he's done so far has me thinking we're headed up the on-ramp to a title run. The football-by-committee approach of ownership probably precludes that regardless of who the g.m. is. We're supposed to settle for good but never great and keep the revenue flowing like dutiful fans.
I was listening to NFL radio this morning with Soloman Wilcots and former Patriot RB James White. The topic was naming their top 5 teams in each conference post draft. When it got to the NFC, they both had the same teams, just in a slightly different order; Eagles, Seahawks, Cowboys, 49ers and Lions. While both liked the Addison selection, neither liked the Vikings offseason. I tend to concur with their projection and would probably throw the Giants in there ahead of the Vikings as well.
So all this once again leads me to....what are we doing? I don't think the Vikings and Kwesi know what they are doing. We are stuck somewhere between trying to appease the expectations of ownership and blowing up the roster on a reset. It's an awful position to be in and I think we are just trying to stay competitive while shuffling the cap and hoping to catch lightning in a bottle at some point.
You don't blow up 13 win rosters. You don't start over at QB. You don't trade your top talent. I agree, I'd like to find the post Cousins path but it can't happen if you can't draft the guy you want. I was on the trade it all for Anthony Richardson bandwagon. So the only other choices are to tank or let it ride. Ownership says tanking is out of the question. How is that KAM's fault? Its their freaking team. They can do whatever they want lol.
Maybe Cousins gets his leg blown up in the first couple games and we go on to a 3-4 win season that puts us in line for a new QB next year? After Stroud and Richardson were gone by pick 4 the only thing left to do was backfill the roster, which I thought they did well.
They like Addison. Who knows? After Addison, we basically spent the entire draft on defense. So answer this. Are we to trust that Flores had a say in who he wanted at what point in the draft to maximize his ability to field a defense? Or are we to assume KAM went rouge and drafted a bunch of kids that Flores and the big KOC had no say in?
We get it, you like Poles in Chicago and instead we hired KAM. You've made that point infinitely clear. Unless Fields takes a major step forward, they got nothing. Even if Fields takes a major step forward they're still a .500 team at best.
Quote: @supafreak84 said:
@ comet52 said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
@ supafreak84 said:
Let's face it, Kwesi was an outside the box, taking a chance kind of hire in the first place. I'm just not a believer in handing the keys over to a guy who wasn't a former player or has a scouting background and I was not in favor of his hire. His first offseason was an almost total bust between signing guys who made little to no impact on a defense that was one of the worst units in the league from a talent standpoint or making trades that didn't work out (Reagor, Blacklock). Zadarius was good for half a season, got injured which is his M.O., and is on his way out the door here at some point. Kwesi was absolutely fleeced repeatedly in draft value in his first draft and the players he selected made almost zero impact, unless we count Ingram's season of average to below average play. If you want to give him credit for hiring KOC, cool, but you also have to acknowledge the decision to bring in Ed Donatell to run the defense and oversee the total transition to a new scheme was just one of theeee worst decisions ever and completely predictable to be the disaster that it was. I thought Kwesi really needed a big draft to overcome the shit show of last offseason and I was okay with this draft. I would have taken some different players at certain spots, but that doesn't mean I didn't like the players that we did select. The bottom line for me is that I just do not agree with the way they do the business of roster building and I'm not sure what the long-term vision is. Kwesi has an uphill battle in trying to manage the Wilf's expectations while trying to keep the roster talented enough to contend. I don't know. This upcoming year is going to be very telling in where this franchise is headed in the future.
I don't think this is the year to tell: next year is the year to know. Still working through some previous cap limitations.
13 wins and a NFCN title: never gets talked about by the KAM naysayers. The stuff some of you focus on is very interesting....I guess that's the nice way to put it, lol.
It doesn't get talked about because his roster contributions last season outside of the mid-season Hockenson trade were nonexistent. We got nothing from his draft unless you want to count Ingram, whom at one point of the season was the lowest rated guard in the league. His trades were busts and nobody cares about 13 wins and a north title when we got bounced (and predictably so) at home in the first round of the playoffs. My neighbor Bob, who is a mailman, could have navigated the same type of offseason. For someone who is allegedly some whizz kid and smarter than everyone else, I have yet to see it. That's why I say he needed a big draft to erase some of the stink in his handling of last offseason. Did it happen? I don't know. I thought it was an average draft which will depend a ton on Addison and what kind of impact he can make.
Hard to get a "big" draft out of our weak batch of picks in a really weak draft class . Still, the proclivity for smallish guys is a head scratcher to me and I would not take a WR2 with a first round pick.
That said, nothing he's done so far has me thinking we're headed up the on-ramp to a title run. The football-by-committee approach of ownership probably precludes that regardless of who the g.m. is. We're supposed to settle for good but never great and keep the revenue flowing like dutiful fans.
I was listening to NFL radio this morning with Soloman Wilcots and former Patriot RB James White. The topic was naming their top 5 teams in each conference post draft. When it got to the NFC, they both had the same teams, just in a slightly different order; Eagles, Seahawks, Cowboys, 49ers and Lions. While both liked the Addison selection, neither liked the Vikings offseason. I tend to concur with their projection and would probably throw the Giants in there ahead of the Vikings as well.
So all this once again leads me to....what are we doing? I don't think the Vikings and Kwesi know what they are doing. We are stuck somewhere between trying to appease the expectations of ownership and blowing up the roster on a reset. It's an awful position to be in and I think we are just trying to stay competitive while shuffling the cap and hoping to catch lightning in a bottle at some point.
I think we're doing what every other team in the NFL is doing, which is trying to build the best roster possible with the resources at our disposal. I know you think we should blow it all up so we can be the Commanders for a decade, but a 13-win team who won the North last year with good, young players like JJ, TJH, Darrisaw, O'Neill, Asamoah and Hunter was never a candidate to do that.
I think the Vikings are a better team in '23 with Cousins in year two, TJH a full season, Addison, Oliver, all five OLs returning, and several players on defense we didn't have last year, including Murphy, Davenport, Cine, Booth, and Evans...not to mention Brian Flores.
I also don't think our offseason is done, considering there's about $25M in cap space in potential moves for O'Neill, TJH, Cook, Z, etc. We'll see how it ends up, but it should be a good competition between us and the Lions for the title.
|
