Quote: @A1Janitor said:
It was absolutely NOT about helping the dem election machine.
It is about protecting the illegal acts by prior administrations involved in corruption.
The russian hoax started as a smear campaign by DNC and Hillary campaign to influence 2016 election. That failed ... so the insurance policy was the special counsel to remove him from office.
Russia and Ukraine - hoax. And they have the evidence against the bad actors in DOJ, pentagon, foreign intelligence, CIA, and MSM.
Keep watching. I was right all along.
You haven't been remotely close about shit.
What was a hoax exactly?
Russians interfered in our elections - fact.
Russia wanted Trump to win - fact.
Trump asked Russia to dig up dirt on Hillary - fact.
Within 24 hrs of Trump's request on national TV, Russians hacked the DNC - fact.
Roger Stone was attempting to procure Hillary's emails from Wikileaks and Assange - fact.
Trump's accepted an offer to meet with Russians in hopes to get dirt on Hillary - fact.
Trump fired the FBI Director, a Republican, for not dropping an investigation into Flynn. Same Republican FBI Director who publicly announced Hillary was under investigation, while NOT broadcasting that Trump's campaign was ALSO under investigation. And if that this was a setup by Obama and Dems, how do you explain that the special counsel was created by Republicans, appointing a Republican to lead it in responseto Trump firing a RepublicanFBI Director who helped him WIN by going public with Hillary's investigation?
You have everything ass backwards.
One question A1:
How was this a smear campaign to influence the 2016 election if Hillary turned over the dirt (Steele dossier) to the FBI and never spoke of its contents or used the information during her campaign? Russia investigation didn't start until AFTER the election genius.
DOH!
