Quote: @supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
Akers looks better than Mattison because he's got a little burst. Mattison takes a bit to get up to speed and it allows defenders to close the gap/catch up. Been some big holes that have evaporated because the dump truck is stuck in 1st gear.
This was exactly why I said swapping Dalvin for Mattison was a mistake. He can't match the burst and is not close to being as good of a receiver. Dalvin may not be doing jack behind Breece Hall and a decimated Jets offensive line, but that doesn't mean he wouldn't be doing more for the Vikings and be an upgrade to Mattison
dalvin at the money he wanted was not a viable option, you are not going to get value out of DC even if he was marginally better than Mattison. And AM has been a better pass catcher in the past, not sure whats fucked his head on catching the ball, but this is a new problem for him and shouldnt have been expected.
Meanwhile the starting dtackle's below average effort leads to an easy pick up by the lineman coming over to help allowing Fields to effortlessly escape.the pocket. I can't decide if Vikes interior line is suited more for being on Dancing With the Stars or Napoleon Dynamite playing Patty-cake with Pedro. Jerry Ball? Pat Williams? You available?
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
Akers looks better than Mattison because he's got a little burst. Mattison takes a bit to get up to speed and it allows defenders to close the gap/catch up. Been some big holes that have evaporated because the dump truck is stuck in 1st gear.
This was exactly why I said swapping Dalvin for Mattison was a mistake. He can't match the burst and is not close to being as good of a receiver. Dalvin may not be doing jack behind Breece Hall and a decimated Jets offensive line, but that doesn't mean he wouldn't be doing more for the Vikings and be an upgrade to Mattison
dalvin at the money he wanted was not a viable option, you are not going to get value out of DC even if he was marginally better than Mattison. And AM has been a better pass catcher in the past, not sure whats fucked his head on catching the ball, but this is a new problem for him and shouldnt have been expected.
I think Cook would have been more productive in this offense than Mattison has been and losing the home run potential that was key in a handful of these one score wins last season would be missed (and it has been). What kind of value do you place on that? It might not have coincided with what the Vikings wanted to pay, but it doesn't mean it's not missed. I'm curious to see if Nwagwu can give us some juice in the run game not that he's cleared from IR.
Any word on "Fast" Kene Nwangwu? He came off IR, I don't think he is the answer, any random conjecture out there?
Quote: @supafreak84 said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
Akers looks better than Mattison because he's got a little burst. Mattison takes a bit to get up to speed and it allows defenders to close the gap/catch up. Been some big holes that have evaporated because the dump truck is stuck in 1st gear.
This was exactly why I said swapping Dalvin for Mattison was a mistake. He can't match the burst and is not close to being as good of a receiver. Dalvin may not be doing jack behind Breece Hall and a decimated Jets offensive line, but that doesn't mean he wouldn't be doing more for the Vikings and be an upgrade to Mattison
dalvin at the money he wanted was not a viable option, you are not going to get value out of DC even if he was marginally better than Mattison. And AM has been a better pass catcher in the past, not sure whats fucked his head on catching the ball, but this is a new problem for him and shouldnt have been expected.
I think Cook would have been more productive in this offense than Mattison has been and losing the home run potential that was key in a handful of these one score wins last season would be missed (and it has been). What kind of value do you place on that? It might not have coincided with what the Vikings wanted to pay, but it doesn't mean it's not missed. I'm curious to see if Nwagwu can give us some juice in the run game not that he's cleared from IR.
Cook might have broke one, but he also would have led to more 3 and outs with his dancing behind the LOS which could have killed one of the scoring drives we had with Mattison. Its easy to think about coulda wouldas, but we let him walk for a reason and its showing in NY.
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
Akers looks better than Mattison because he's got a little burst. Mattison takes a bit to get up to speed and it allows defenders to close the gap/catch up. Been some big holes that have evaporated because the dump truck is stuck in 1st gear.
This was exactly why I said swapping Dalvin for Mattison was a mistake. He can't match the burst and is not close to being as good of a receiver. Dalvin may not be doing jack behind Breece Hall and a decimated Jets offensive line, but that doesn't mean he wouldn't be doing more for the Vikings and be an upgrade to Mattison
dalvin at the money he wanted was not a viable option, you are not going to get value out of DC even if he was marginally better than Mattison. And AM has been a better pass catcher in the past, not sure whats fucked his head on catching the ball, but this is a new problem for him and shouldnt have been expected.
I think Cook would have been more productive in this offense than Mattison has been and losing the home run potential that was key in a handful of these one score wins last season would be missed (and it has been). What kind of value do you place on that? It might not have coincided with what the Vikings wanted to pay, but it doesn't mean it's not missed. I'm curious to see if Nwagwu can give us some juice in the run game not that he's cleared from IR.
Cook might have broke one, but he also would have led to more 3 and outs with his dancing behind the LOS which could have killed one of the scoring drives we had with Mattison. Its easy to think about coulda wouldas, but we let him walk for a reason and its showing in NY.
We are 30th in rushing offense averaging 75 yards a game. Zero rushing TD's on the year (one of only two teams), and have zero runs of 20+ yards. People want to know what's wrong with our offense this year? We can start with the lack of explosion in the running game and missing that element that Cook provided.
Maybe if we are going to try to make a run we should look at trading for Cook with the Jets picking up a chunk of his salary. Jets just traded Hardman, back to the Chiefs, maybe bringing Cook back to Minnesota is something the Vikings should consider as he's not being used in NY.
Quote: @supafreak84 said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
Akers looks better than Mattison because he's got a little burst. Mattison takes a bit to get up to speed and it allows defenders to close the gap/catch up. Been some big holes that have evaporated because the dump truck is stuck in 1st gear.
This was exactly why I said swapping Dalvin for Mattison was a mistake. He can't match the burst and is not close to being as good of a receiver. Dalvin may not be doing jack behind Breece Hall and a decimated Jets offensive line, but that doesn't mean he wouldn't be doing more for the Vikings and be an upgrade to Mattison
dalvin at the money he wanted was not a viable option, you are not going to get value out of DC even if he was marginally better than Mattison. And AM has been a better pass catcher in the past, not sure whats fucked his head on catching the ball, but this is a new problem for him and shouldnt have been expected.
I think Cook would have been more productive in this offense than Mattison has been and losing the home run potential that was key in a handful of these one score wins last season would be missed (and it has been). What kind of value do you place on that? It might not have coincided with what the Vikings wanted to pay, but it doesn't mean it's not missed. I'm curious to see if Nwagwu can give us some juice in the run game not that he's cleared from IR.
Cook might have broke one, but he also would have led to more 3 and outs with his dancing behind the LOS which could have killed one of the scoring drives we had with Mattison. Its easy to think about coulda wouldas, but we let him walk for a reason and its showing in NY.
We are 30th in rushing offense averaging 75 yards a game. Zero rushing TD's on the year (one of only two teams), and have zero runs of 20+ yards. People want to know what's wrong with our offense this year? We can start with the lack of explosion in the running game and missing that element that Cook provided.
Also go back and look at how little KOC was running the ball some of those games. Sorry I am not on board with bringing cook back, its not his location that is the problem, hes done. Sure he might have a flash here or there, but when RBs start dancing, looking for homeruns instead of 4 yards, then they become a liability, positive yards ans first downs should be the priority first and if one of those runs breaks then great, but his game was declining 2 years ago and continued since.
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
Akers looks better than Mattison because he's got a little burst. Mattison takes a bit to get up to speed and it allows defenders to close the gap/catch up. Been some big holes that have evaporated because the dump truck is stuck in 1st gear.
This was exactly why I said swapping Dalvin for Mattison was a mistake. He can't match the burst and is not close to being as good of a receiver. Dalvin may not be doing jack behind Breece Hall and a decimated Jets offensive line, but that doesn't mean he wouldn't be doing more for the Vikings and be an upgrade to Mattison
dalvin at the money he wanted was not a viable option, you are not going to get value out of DC even if he was marginally better than Mattison. And AM has been a better pass catcher in the past, not sure whats fucked his head on catching the ball, but this is a new problem for him and shouldnt have been expected.
I think Cook would have been more productive in this offense than Mattison has been and losing the home run potential that was key in a handful of these one score wins last season would be missed (and it has been). What kind of value do you place on that? It might not have coincided with what the Vikings wanted to pay, but it doesn't mean it's not missed. I'm curious to see if Nwagwu can give us some juice in the run game not that he's cleared from IR.
Cook might have broke one, but he also would have led to more 3 and outs with his dancing behind the LOS which could have killed one of the scoring drives we had with Mattison. Its easy to think about coulda wouldas, but we let him walk for a reason and its showing in NY.
We are 30th in rushing offense averaging 75 yards a game. Zero rushing TD's on the year (one of only two teams), and have zero runs of 20+ yards. People want to know what's wrong with our offense this year? We can start with the lack of explosion in the running game and missing that element that Cook provided.
Also go back and look at how little KOC was running the ball some of those games. Sorry I am not on board with bringing cook back, its not his location that is the problem, hes done. Sure he might have a flash here or there, but when RBs start dancing, looking for homeruns instead of 4 yards, then they become a liability, positive yards ans first downs should be the priority first and if one of those runs breaks then great, but his game was declining 2 years ago and continued since.
Just my opinion but KOC comes from the Rams and that style offense has never prioritized the run. That played out last season with Cook, who despite that hit some big homeruns that were sorely needed in close games. You might be right that he is in decline, but even in decline he's a better player than Mattison. Mattison is the definition of taking the short run and gaining positive yards, but the big play element is just missing. When teams don't fear a running back breaking one on them, their job becomes a lot easier.
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ supafreak84 said:
@ StickyBun said:
Akers looks better than Mattison because he's got a little burst. Mattison takes a bit to get up to speed and it allows defenders to close the gap/catch up. Been some big holes that have evaporated because the dump truck is stuck in 1st gear.
This was exactly why I said swapping Dalvin for Mattison was a mistake. He can't match the burst and is not close to being as good of a receiver. Dalvin may not be doing jack behind Breece Hall and a decimated Jets offensive line, but that doesn't mean he wouldn't be doing more for the Vikings and be an upgrade to Mattison
dalvin at the money he wanted was not a viable option, you are not going to get value out of DC even if he was marginally better than Mattison. And AM has been a better pass catcher in the past, not sure whats fucked his head on catching the ball, but this is a new problem for him and shouldnt have been expected.
I think Cook would have been more productive in this offense than Mattison has been and losing the home run potential that was key in a handful of these one score wins last season would be missed (and it has been). What kind of value do you place on that? It might not have coincided with what the Vikings wanted to pay, but it doesn't mean it's not missed. I'm curious to see if Nwagwu can give us some juice in the run game not that he's cleared from IR.
Cook might have broke one, but he also would have led to more 3 and outs with his dancing behind the LOS which could have killed one of the scoring drives we had with Mattison. Its easy to think about coulda wouldas, but we let him walk for a reason and its showing in NY.
We are 30th in rushing offense averaging 75 yards a game. Zero rushing TD's on the year (one of only two teams), and have zero runs of 20+ yards. People want to know what's wrong with our offense this year? We can start with the lack of explosion in the running game and missing that element that Cook provided.
Also go back and look at how little KOC was running the ball some of those games. Sorry I am not on board with bringing cook back, its not his location that is the problem, hes done. Sure he might have a flash here or there, but when RBs start dancing, looking for homeruns instead of 4 yards, then they become a liability, positive yards ans first downs should be the priority first and if one of those runs breaks then great, but his game was declining 2 years ago and continued since.
I think you have illuminated the problem. It was a problem last year when we HAD Cook. It is a problem now with Mattison.
If our offense can't figure out how to run the ball, they will never achieve much.
|
