Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Completely stupid, totally ridiculous question
#31
Would the Cowboys do that deal? They'd have a long discussion about it and I have no doubts the Vikings could get a 1st round pick for Diggs. 

Would the Vikings do that? No. Why do you trade a productive player you have under contract at $2M and is one of the most well liked presences in the locker room. Sure you can argue that he is going to cost a lot. But you don't just deal away productive players on their rookie contracts. You won't make many friends with agents, free agents, or current players on the team. 

Basically, if a player in the NFL is moved its typically for a very specific reason. 
Reply

#32
Quote: @"Geoff Nichols" said:
Would the Cowboys do that deal? They'd have a long discussion about it and I have no doubts the Vikings could get a 1st round pick for Diggs. 

Would the Vikings do that? No. Why do you trade a productive player you have under contract at $2M and is one of the most well liked presences in the locker room. Sure you can argue that he is going to cost a lot. But you don't just deal away productive players on their rookie contracts. You won't make many friends with agents, free agents, or current players on the team. 

Basically, if a player in the NFL is moved its typically for a very specific reason. 
It's even simpler than that. Vikings have stacked this roster like it's never been stacked before. They paid a strong armed QB a tub of money to go downfield. The whole team is thinking Super Bowl.

Hey, what a great time to sacrifice some serious weaponry...in the interest....of....the future? 

It's not just stupid, it's comically stupid. 
Reply

#33
One of these guys probably won't be re-signed...I'd trade the guy who typically misses a couple games and is ineffective due to injury for several more...especially staring down a potential contract he is going to be no way worthy of...Diggs won't be the reason we do or don't make a super bowl...not by a long shot... 
Reply

#34
Quote: @"BarrNone55" said:
One of these guys probably won't be re-signed...I'd trade the guy who typically misses a couple games and is ineffective due to injury for several more...especially staring down a potential contract he is going to be no way worthy of...Diggs won't be the reason we do or don't make a super bowl...not by a long shot... 
They would have been out in the divisional round last year if it weren't for him  Wink
Reply

#35
The bigger thing here is that its easy to overvalue draft picks. You draft players to find the ones like Diggs. Trade Diggs away and there is about a 50% chance you're going to be paying a first round pick more than Diggs' currently and he won't be half as productive. 
Reply

#36

Reply

#37
I guess I'm going on the premise that we won't be able to keep everyone...Brez, prove me wrong...Do I sacrifice Hunter? Nope, upside is tremendous and we are uber thin at DE... Do I sacrifice Barr? The defensive signal caller and the straw that stirs the drink? Nope. Waynes? We were number 2 in pass D, and considering how tight the roads were closed on the other side, no I don't. 

We've played more games without Diggs the past few years than any of those guys...always banged up going back to H.S...our O despite the $84 million dollar man is going to focus on Cook and Murray...that's hard wired into Zim' s DNA...throw in McGlinchy, the best G at #30 left...our window stays open far longer without paying crazy money to an always injured WR... 
Reply

#38
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@Wetlander said:
I find it funny how fans start to down play the value of players when it comes time to re-do their deals...  Diggs is a very good WR and he is 24 years old.  I doubt we've seen his peak yet.  I think it would be foolish to trade him or let him walk.  I would trade Barr before Diggs if we're worried about fitting some of these upcoming free agents under the cap.  I think it would be easier to replace his role in the defense than finding another WR of Diggs caliber in the draft.
some, with a better understanding of our scheme than I,  say that Barr is the key piece to what Zimmer is doing with this defense,  I would hardly say that Diggs is that critical to what the O is doing.  not arguing,  just saying that Barrs athleticism and real contributions on D might be misunderstood.
I cant wait to see Barr with a 3t who might actually be the best there since KW. Fingers Crossed. 
Reply

#39
Some tough choices if they have to make them.  I was a little surprised they only signed Richardson to a one year deal when a 3T like him is such a rare bird.

My problem with dropping Diggs because he is oft injured is that he is in a skill position with the thinnest depth.  He might be the toughest to replace and hurt them the most if he leaves.
Reply

#40
Hi I got a brand new Car


Hey let's take off some of the wheels and see how this baby performs   Seriously crack is wack
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.