Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Kupp: Where do you stand?
#31
The one thing Kupp brings that we currently dont have is excellent blocking from the position.
“Hell is empty and all the devils are here”

Shakespeare 
Reply

#32
I think Dallas has woken from its slumber and decided to partake, they are going hard for Kupp.
Reply

#33
I think we might be looking at this all wrong.
I have been assuming all along that JJets is #1 and Addison is #2 and Nailor has been #3 WR.

When JJets is covered like a blanket, Addison has stepped up and had big games. Nailor has had some nice games too, but not as good a route runner, not as good hands.

We are all pretty sure that Addison is going to be suspended for that DUI last year. Two games? Four games? We don't know yet.

But are we sure that we Kupp might emerge as a WR 2? As well as Addison? Is the WR 2 or WR 3 designation...are we saddling ourselves with that designation?

I think if we have the cap room, we should pull this trigger.
Reply

#34
(Yesterday, 12:03 PM)Montana Tom Wrote: I think we might be looking at this all wrong.
I have been assuming all along that JJets is #1 and Addison is #2 and Nailor has been #3 WR.

When JJets is covered like a blanket, Addison has stepped up and had big games.  Nailor has had some nice games too, but not as good a route runner, not as good hands.

We are all pretty sure that Addison is going to be suspended for that DUI last year.  Two games?  Four games?  We don't know yet.

But are we sure that we Kupp might emerge as a WR 2?  As well as Addison?  Is the WR 2 or WR 3 designation...are we saddling ourselves with that designation? 

I think if we have the cap room, we should pull this trigger.

For those that want Kupp, then you should be agreeing with my take that we should be taking OG Tyler Booker with our first round pick. Same logic. Do we need WR3 like Kupp with the salary pay with an already stacked WRer core?? Do we need to take an OG with an already stacked offensive line?
Reply

#35
Signed with Seattle
Reply

#36
(Yesterday, 05:29 PM)supafreak84 Wrote: Signed with Seattle

Yah, just saw that...

3 yr/$45mm

Not sure of the contract details, I'm sure they were offering more than us and he'll play there more too.

Darnold isnt the worst QB in the world and he stays in the PST zone too.
Reply

#37
(Yesterday, 06:09 PM)purplefaithful Wrote: Yah, just saw that...

3 yr/$45mm

Not sure of the contract details, I'm sure they were offering more than us and he'll play there more too.

Darnold isnt the worst QB in the world and he stays in the PST zone too.

Good signing for Seattle. Let's see how Uncle Sammy deals with a pretty bad O-line like Geno Smith did.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.