01-31-2019, 10:06 AM
Quote: @matt4787 said:
You do remember it much better then me. So it seems the only thing they were guilty of was being smarter then the house. Good for them. There's a reason I don't do casinos or even gamble. I'm smart enough to know I'm not smart enough.@suncoastvike said:
What do you mean by in trouble I suppose? Because it wasn't illegal. There was also an incident where Phil Ivey and another person were edge sorting on Baccarat for an advantage. The backs of cards had a discrepency with the faces and the borders were shorter than the other cards. So they would allow the dealers to deal out the 4 cards and they allowed Phil Ivey and his partner to bet after the cards were out and they were allowed to look at the back of the cards. Apparently the casino won a lawsuit against them on this but it is bullshit. The casino offered them to bet after cards were out and to look at the back of the cards. They allowed this to occur. All Phil Ivey and his partner did was also use there mind to see the slight difference of the back of the cards.@matt4787 said:
I think if I remember right it was the coordinated stuff that got them in trouble. Using several players stationed and that sort of thing. I know next to nothing about gambling or casinos.@suncoastvike said:
That's cool. You know the whole MIT card counting thing was kinda funny to me. I guess it was because they were coordinating their efforts that made it wrong. It should never be wrong though to be smarter then who you're betting against. It's not wrong. It is just that the house can find ways to not take your action. The house is a business and it is about winning long-term against a player. I am a blackjack dealer out of state. In Missouri we can't kick people out for counting cards. But we can make it where it doesn't benefit them ie. shuffle after every hand on double deck. I'd say that of the people that think they can count cards 1% are actually effective and good at it. And honestly it is very difficult to mask it and get a full benefit of a good count. The coodinated efforts is the best way to mask it because you have a person that allows the big player to play during a good count and the house can't really know they are counting the cards because they are not alternating there bet or just alternating it a little bit. But another way to combat that is in high limit games you can do a mid-shoe entry.