Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
NFL Power Rankings
#11
Just because stats can be ridiculous:

https://twitter.com/Krauserrific/status/...7666464768
Reply

#12
Quote: @StickyBun said:
@purplefaithful said:
Is everyone too high on the Vikings after Week 1?The first game of the Kevin O'Connell era was impressive, but the Vikings still need to prove themselves.When the Minnesota Vikings took the field on Sunday, they were relative unknowns. Some believed that the change to Kevin O'Connell would deliver a jolt of energy but nobody knew how long it would take to become serious contenders.

It turns out that all it took was one week.
The Vikings destroyed the Green Bay Packers and suddenly everyone is chugging purple Kool-Aid. FiveThirtyEight doubled their odds to win the Super Bowl. Pro Football Talk discussed Justin Jefferson as an MVP candidate. Some believe they are one of the best teams in the NFC.
All of this has Vikings fans higher than Aaron Rodgers on ayahuasca but it's important to remember that we've seen this movie before.
One year ago, the Vikings were coming off a similar performance against the Seattle Seahawks. They fell into a 17-7 hole but scored the final 23 points in a 30-17 victory. Everyone felt good after the game and praised Kirk Cousins's swagger. 
The following week, the Vikings scored just seven points in a loss to the Cleveland Browns.
The roller coaster continued as they dragged through the season. They won the next two games and then lost to Cooper Rush. They beat the Los Angeles Chargers and the Packers before Cousins lined up behind his guard. 
Every high was followed by a new low. Sometimes it happened in the same game.
The Vikings hosted the Pittsburgh Steelers in Week 14 and jumped out to a 29-0 lead. The Steelers finally scored with 2:11 left in the third quarter and proceeded to make a furious comeback. If it weren't for Pat Freiermuth's drop in the end zone, the Steelers would have attempted a game-tying two-point conversion. Instead, the Vikings gutted out a 36-28 victory.
A win over Chicago came the following week and then the Vikings had their "Christmas Hangover" game against O'Connell's Los Angeles Rams. By that point, the season was over until they scored a meaningless Week 18 victory over the Bears.
Back and forth. Up and down. The roller coaster never stopped. Some may say this is a product of Zimmer's toxic environment but a large part of the roster remains from that team.
The Vikings have a golden opportunity to buck that trend in Week 2. The Philadelphia Eagles are legitimate contenders in the NFC and a primetime matchup on the road is the kind of game the Vikings' routinely lost under Zimmer.
The old Vikings would have read too many of their press clippings and turned in an effort that would sink their season. The new Vikings may be different but we won't know until they take the field.
If the Vikings can turn in a similar performance against the Eagles, they could be on their way toward contention. They have two winnable games at home against the Bears and Lions. They have a coin flip game in London against the New Orleans Saints. A trip to Miami is daunting but if they can win in Philadelphia, they can win anywhere.
That would pave the way for the Vikings to go into the bye week at 4-2 and potentially 6-0, but a loss would reinforce the same concerns everyone had at the beginning of the season.
This is the challenge that O'Connell faces. If he can find a way to make the Vikings consistent, the narrative created with largely the same roster under Zimmer can be put to bed.
https://www.si.com/fannation/bringmethes...ter-week-1
I don't think a loss to the Eagles is going to reinforce anything negative, unless its a shit show. Hell, I really thought the team would be 0-2 out of the gate. 1-1 is very manageable. Any every team needs to be consistent, not just Minnesota. 

This is today's NFL media, they over exaggerate everything regardless.
A win on the road vs Eagles on MNF might would defiantly be a trend breaker...

We all know it's a long season; September is for show but December is for dough no doubt. 
Reply

#13
Quote: @purplefaithful said:
@StickyBun said:
@purplefaithful said:
Is everyone too high on the Vikings after Week 1?The first game of the Kevin O'Connell era was impressive, but the Vikings still need to prove themselves.When the Minnesota Vikings took the field on Sunday, they were relative unknowns. Some believed that the change to Kevin O'Connell would deliver a jolt of energy but nobody knew how long it would take to become serious contenders.

It turns out that all it took was one week.
The Vikings destroyed the Green Bay Packers and suddenly everyone is chugging purple Kool-Aid. FiveThirtyEight doubled their odds to win the Super Bowl. Pro Football Talk discussed Justin Jefferson as an MVP candidate. Some believe they are one of the best teams in the NFC.
All of this has Vikings fans higher than Aaron Rodgers on ayahuasca but it's important to remember that we've seen this movie before.
One year ago, the Vikings were coming off a similar performance against the Seattle Seahawks. They fell into a 17-7 hole but scored the final 23 points in a 30-17 victory. Everyone felt good after the game and praised Kirk Cousins's swagger. 
The following week, the Vikings scored just seven points in a loss to the Cleveland Browns.
The roller coaster continued as they dragged through the season. They won the next two games and then lost to Cooper Rush. They beat the Los Angeles Chargers and the Packers before Cousins lined up behind his guard. 
Every high was followed by a new low. Sometimes it happened in the same game.
The Vikings hosted the Pittsburgh Steelers in Week 14 and jumped out to a 29-0 lead. The Steelers finally scored with 2:11 left in the third quarter and proceeded to make a furious comeback. If it weren't for Pat Freiermuth's drop in the end zone, the Steelers would have attempted a game-tying two-point conversion. Instead, the Vikings gutted out a 36-28 victory.
A win over Chicago came the following week and then the Vikings had their "Christmas Hangover" game against O'Connell's Los Angeles Rams. By that point, the season was over until they scored a meaningless Week 18 victory over the Bears.
Back and forth. Up and down. The roller coaster never stopped. Some may say this is a product of Zimmer's toxic environment but a large part of the roster remains from that team.
The Vikings have a golden opportunity to buck that trend in Week 2. The Philadelphia Eagles are legitimate contenders in the NFC and a primetime matchup on the road is the kind of game the Vikings' routinely lost under Zimmer.
The old Vikings would have read too many of their press clippings and turned in an effort that would sink their season. The new Vikings may be different but we won't know until they take the field.
If the Vikings can turn in a similar performance against the Eagles, they could be on their way toward contention. They have two winnable games at home against the Bears and Lions. They have a coin flip game in London against the New Orleans Saints. A trip to Miami is daunting but if they can win in Philadelphia, they can win anywhere.
That would pave the way for the Vikings to go into the bye week at 4-2 and potentially 6-0, but a loss would reinforce the same concerns everyone had at the beginning of the season.
This is the challenge that O'Connell faces. If he can find a way to make the Vikings consistent, the narrative created with largely the same roster under Zimmer can be put to bed.
https://www.si.com/fannation/bringmethes...ter-week-1
I don't think a loss to the Eagles is going to reinforce anything negative, unless its a shit show. Hell, I really thought the team would be 0-2 out of the gate. 1-1 is very manageable. Any every team needs to be consistent, not just Minnesota. 

This is today's NFL media, they over exaggerate everything regardless.
A win on the road vs Eagles on MNF might would defiantly be a trend breaker...

We all know it's a long season; September is for show but December is for dough no doubt. 
Yep, to your point, conversely a win would be pretty huge to a new narrative. 
Reply

#14
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
LOL. After one game. Where did they have them on Saturday? Pretty low I'd bet. 

Power rankers are lazy. I used to work at a newspaper and got to know the sports writers pretty well. Here's what they do: Look at last year's record, look at additions and subtractions, rank accordingly. They pay zero attention to the talent on the roster, injuries, various causes of success or failure, and if those causes are removed or remain. 
Power rankings are the ultimate clickbait.  Everyone wants to be told how great their team is and will provide plenty of clicks and feedback to argue about it.  
Reply

#15
Quote: @comet52 said:
It's a media beauty contest.  We aced the evening gown competition.  Next week is swimwear.   Then the part where they have to talk to the audience about how they want world peace.  =)
Have never thought of Philly as the swimwear contest.  More like the beauty contestants playing dodgeball with batteries.
Reply

#16
Vikings are #3 in the Herd Hierarchy. Colin loves Minnesota and has said as much for 4 months. Obviously, take with a grain as with everything....said they are a 12-13 win team.
Reply

#17
Quote: @StickyBun said:
Vikings are #3 in the Herd Hierarchy. Colin loves Minnesota and has said as much for 4 months. Obviously, take with a grain as with everything....said they are a 12-13 win team.
Cowherd seems to be one of the few who actually recognized the talent that was already on the roster. I know we've already been through this a hundred times, but last year's team was far more talented than 8-9 would suggest. 
Reply

#18
I predicted a 2-0 start which would be a strong indicator in the ability of this team.

You have to like the chance of getting to 4-2 or better, particularly if you beat Philly in Philly.  I think this coaching staff won't allow for let downs vs lesser opponents, so Det and Chi at home, we will be favored to win.
New Orleans is a toss up and an advantage for Minnesota playing in London vs the Superdome.  Road game for both

Get out of the gate 4-2 at worst with two wins, maybe 3 over NFC contenders is a great start because the back half of the schedule looks favorable (last 8)
  • Vs an out of the playoffs demoralized Dallas and New England squads (both looked terrible)
  • 2 against the New York teams, two more non playoff caliber teams
  • Chicago and Detroit, never easy, but we will be favored
  • GB and Indy.  Seems like Splitsville 
So a good possibility of 5-3/6-2 if we are as good (and healthy) as we can be.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
8 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.