Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
72+ Hours Out
#11
Moving to #4 better be for Fields or Lance
Reply

#12
I know we need our O-line fixed in a bad way but paying QB prices to move up to #4 for one would be really, really, REALLY dumb. I don’t think any GM including our own would do that.

EDIT- I agree with @ilovebritney. Hopefully the Vikings are sending smoke that they’re moving up for OL, but they actually have eyes on a QB. It’s probably happened at some point (?), but I can’t remember a team giving up a ransom for an offensive lineman.
Reply

#13
Quote: @purplefaithful said:
@"BarrNone55" said:
Man, moving to #4 better be for Sewell.
I can't disagree with that...

You know Pitts would be worth it too, but obviously they wouldn't do that for a TE. 

Moving to 4 would be a kings ransom. 


Teams pay a king's ransom for a franchise QB, not for a LT.  
Reply

#14
[Image: 49h2nh3i44xh.jpeg]

Oops...
Reply

#15
Quote: @dadevike said:
@purplefaithful said:
@"BarrNone55" said:
Man, moving to #4 better be for Sewell.
I can't disagree with that...

You know Pitts would be worth it too, but obviously they wouldn't do that for a TE. 

Moving to 4 would be a kings ransom. 


Teams pay a king's ransom for a franchise QB, not for a LT.  
Or a TE...

Scouts speak of Sewell as generational talent.
Reply

#16
Sean Borman
@SeanBormanNFL
· 11m
.@PAOnTheMic on KFAN said a #Vikings trade up would likely be for tackle Rashawn Slater twitter.com/tompelissero/s…
Reply

#17
*loading up on Samsung stock*
Reply

#18
Quote: @"BarrNone55" said:
Sean Borman
@SeanBormanNFL
· 11m
.@PAOnTheMic on KFAN said a #Vikings trade up would likely be for tackle Rashawn Slater twitter.com/tompelissero/s…
Sewell is going to be the #1 OT taken...Maybe they see Slater as someone available in that 7-11 slot..
Reply

#19
Quote: @purplefaithful said:
@dadevike said:
@purplefaithful said:
@"BarrNone55" said:
Man, moving to #4 better be for Sewell.
I can't disagree with that...

You know Pitts would be worth it too, but obviously they wouldn't do that for a TE. 

Moving to 4 would be a kings ransom. 


Teams pay a king's ransom for a franchise QB, not for a LT.  
Or a TE...

Scouts speak of Sewell as generational talent.
And he might be. But if the Vikings can stay put and get a good OT (Darrisaw) and keep all their picks, I would much prefer that over giving up future 1s and picks this year to move up to 4 to get Sewell.  
Reply

#20
I see nothing about Slater that would be compelling to require a move up. Probably the highest floor of the Top 3 OTs. You don't move up for safe in the top 10. 
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.