Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@ Kentis said:
@ JimmyinSD said:
@ StickyBun said:
NFL players aren't the sharpest knives in the drawer.
At the same time, how many vaccinated Yankees have gotten covid? What percent of that roster was previously vaccinated? If rivera was as concerned for his own situation as he claims he would be looking at what is happening and perhaps take some time off to protect himself. The notion that he would be safe if more were vaccinated is only partially true but how much safer he would be is certainly up for debate.
I am starting to wonder if the vaccine is really preventing covid or if its just masking its affects in so many that they aren't getting tested, and masking the effectiveness in preventing infection.
You can still test positive for Covid after vaccination, though your chances seem much lower. However, it’s likely you’ll experience a much milder disease and a much lower chance for hospitalization and intubation w/ the jab.
How much lower though are they really? When you have a baseball team and half the roster ( not really sure the % but its a lot over at least 2 known incidents) has tested positive after getting the vaccine i dont think an immune compromised guy should be trusting a locker room and coaching staff the size of an NFL team for his well being regardless of their vaccination status and to try and put that on a few players wrong. I really have to question the reported effectiveness of the vaccines in preventing the spread of the virus until more is known from what we have seen. Yes it can prevent those that get the virus from getting as ill, but that doesn't prevent them getting sick or transmitting it to others, and it doesn't prevent it from mutating in a vaccinated person just as it could in an infected unvaccinated person does it?
The vaccine was for Alpha, Delta was unknown at the time. The race to herd immunity was to minimize mutations in a population, also taking measures to minimize community spread. Biology is pure chaos compared to physics or chemistry, thats why epidemiology uses probability curves rather than balanced equations. The probability that Delta was mutated in a vaccinated population is insignificant compared to the probability the mutation occured in a non vaccinated population spread by community interaction.
He's pro-choice, I would never have guessed, that's about all that was in that word salad. Wonder who wrote that for him, his barber?
Quote: @Kentis said:
@ greediron said:
https://news.yahoo.com/breakthrough-covi...jwumo1bpf4
Nearly 3% of medical workers in a new Israeli study contracted COVID-19 even though they were vaccinated, and 19% of them still had symptoms six weeks later.
Although the vaccines were never expected to be perfect, the findings raise questions about their protection and suggest that even vaccinated people could experience long-term symptoms such as such as fatigue, brain fog and shortness of breath.
Well 97+% sounds pretty damn good, especially for medical workers who I’m sure are exposed a lot more than most. As for fatigue, brain fog, and shortness of breath, those are also the symptoms of old age… 
97%, just a tad under the survival rate for covid.
Quote: @greediron said:
@ Kentis said:
@ greediron said:
https://news.yahoo.com/breakthrough-covi...jwumo1bpf4
Nearly 3% of medical workers in a new Israeli study contracted COVID-19 even though they were vaccinated, and 19% of them still had symptoms six weeks later.
Although the vaccines were never expected to be perfect, the findings raise questions about their protection and suggest that even vaccinated people could experience long-term symptoms such as such as fatigue, brain fog and shortness of breath.
Well 97+% sounds pretty damn good, especially for medical workers who I’m sure are exposed a lot more than most. As for fatigue, brain fog, and shortness of breath, those are also the symptoms of old age…
97%, just a tad under the survival rate for covid.
That survival rate contains a wide variety of unpleasant, and even near-fatal experiences, including long-term hospital stays, and lingering effects, even after mild infection.
Quote: @greediron said:
@ Kentis said:
@ greediron said:
https://news.yahoo.com/breakthrough-covi...jwumo1bpf4
Nearly 3% of medical workers in a new Israeli study contracted COVID-19 even though they were vaccinated, and 19% of them still had symptoms six weeks later.
Although the vaccines were never expected to be perfect, the findings raise questions about their protection and suggest that even vaccinated people could experience long-term symptoms such as such as fatigue, brain fog and shortness of breath.
Well 97+% sounds pretty damn good, especially for medical workers who I’m sure are exposed a lot more than most. As for fatigue, brain fog, and shortness of breath, those are also the symptoms of old age…
97%, just a tad under the survival rate for covid.
(Oct 15, 2020)
Quote: @greediron said:
@ Kentis said:
@ greediron said:
https://news.yahoo.com/breakthrough-covi...jwumo1bpf4
Nearly 3% of medical workers in a new Israeli study contracted COVID-19 even though they were vaccinated, and 19% of them still had symptoms six weeks later.
Although the vaccines were never expected to be perfect, the findings raise questions about their protection and suggest that even vaccinated people could experience long-term symptoms such as such as fatigue, brain fog and shortness of breath.
Well 97+% sounds pretty damn good, especially for medical workers who I’m sure are exposed a lot more than most. As for fatigue, brain fog, and shortness of breath, those are also the symptoms of old age…
97%, just a tad under the survival rate for covid.
The study followed about 1,500 Israeli health care workers for four months after they received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Anyone who tested positive more than 11 days after the second dose was considered a breakthrough case.
Thirty-nine people – 2.6% of the total – were diagnosed with the virus. One was immunosuppressed; the rest were healthy, including nurses, maintenance workers and a few doctors.
All 37 people for whom data was available were infected by an unvaccinated person, usually within their homes.
Two-thirds had mild symptoms; the rest had none at all.
Rauscher, replacing Rick Dennison as the Vikings offensive line coach, took the reins during Wednesday's practice and did not go unheard. ![[Image: 08_1013388108_07VIKE072921.jpg?w=525&h=6...es&dpr=1.5]](https://chorus.stimg.co/22747171/08_1013388108_07VIKE072921.jpg?w=525&h=600&format=auto%2Ccompress&cs=tinysrgb&auto=compress&crop=faces&dpr=1.5) CARLOS GONZALEZ, STAR TRIBUNE New Vikings offensive line coach Phil Rauscher during Wednesday’s practice. You could hear the change in Vikings offensive line coaches on Wednesday.
The colorful Phil Rauscher, a 36-year-old former UCLA offensive lineman, is a stark departure in style from the understated Rick Dennison, but the philosophies aren't expected to change much since Rauscher's experience with the Kubiak playbook goes back to his first NFL job with the Denver Broncos under Gary Kubiak.
As Rauscher enters his first year as Vikings offensive line coach, replacing Dennison, who was moved to a virtual-only advisory role due to league vaccine protocols, he does so with a boisterous reputation built off one year as Dennison's assistant. But now it's his O-line room.
"Coach Dennison always lets Phil do what he does," running back Dalvin Cook said, "but now Phil can be as loud as he wants now."
From "if you're late, you're dead" to other, less-printable mantras for Vikings offensive linemen, Rauscher could be heard across multiple practice fields while hovering over offensive linemen during 1-on-1 pass rushing drills.
Despite an abrupt change in both responsibilities and style on the Vikings coaching staff, quarterback Kirk Cousins gave Rauscher a vote of confidence.
"It isn't a major transition," Cousins said. "Can't say enough about his experience. He coached with Bill Callahan in Washington, who I was able to work with in Washington. There's some similarities there. He goes way back even with this scheme back to Denver. He's played the position of center so he knows his stuff and has great command of our offense."
Quote: @"BarrNone55" said:
Rauscher, replacing Rick Dennison as the Vikings offensive line coach, took the reins during Wednesday's practice and did not go unheard. CARLOS GONZALEZ, STAR TRIBUNE New Vikings offensive line coach Phil Rauscher during Wednesday’s practice. You could hear the change in Vikings offensive line coaches on Wednesday.
The colorful Phil Rauscher, a 36-year-old former UCLA offensive lineman, is a stark departure in style from the understated Rick Dennison, but the philosophies aren't expected to change much since Rauscher's experience with the Kubiak playbook goes back to his first NFL job with the Denver Broncos under Gary Kubiak.
As Rauscher enters his first year as Vikings offensive line coach, replacing Dennison, who was moved to a virtual-only advisory role due to league vaccine protocols, he does so with a boisterous reputation built off one year as Dennison's assistant. But now it's his O-line room.
"Coach Dennison always lets Phil do what he does," running back Dalvin Cook said, "but now Phil can be as loud as he wants now."
From "if you're late, you're dead" to other, less-printable mantras for Vikings offensive linemen, Rauscher could be heard across multiple practice fields while hovering over offensive linemen during 1-on-1 pass rushing drills.
Despite an abrupt change in both responsibilities and style on the Vikings coaching staff, quarterback Kirk Cousins gave Rauscher a vote of confidence.
"It isn't a major transition," Cousins said. "Can't say enough about his experience. He coached with Bill Callahan in Washington, who I was able to work with in Washington. There's some similarities there. He goes way back even with this scheme back to Denver. He's played the position of center so he knows his stuff and has great command of our offense."
honestly, i cant imagine having an OL coach that isnt loud, crude, and abrasive.
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
@"BarrNone55" said:
Rauscher, replacing Rick Dennison as the Vikings offensive line coach, took the reins during Wednesday's practice and did not go unheard. CARLOS GONZALEZ, STAR TRIBUNE New Vikings offensive line coach Phil Rauscher during Wednesday’s practice. You could hear the change in Vikings offensive line coaches on Wednesday.
The colorful Phil Rauscher, a 36-year-old former UCLA offensive lineman, is a stark departure in style from the understated Rick Dennison, but the philosophies aren't expected to change much since Rauscher's experience with the Kubiak playbook goes back to his first NFL job with the Denver Broncos under Gary Kubiak.
As Rauscher enters his first year as Vikings offensive line coach, replacing Dennison, who was moved to a virtual-only advisory role due to league vaccine protocols, he does so with a boisterous reputation built off one year as Dennison's assistant. But now it's his O-line room.
"Coach Dennison always lets Phil do what he does," running back Dalvin Cook said, "but now Phil can be as loud as he wants now."
From "if you're late, you're dead" to other, less-printable mantras for Vikings offensive linemen, Rauscher could be heard across multiple practice fields while hovering over offensive linemen during 1-on-1 pass rushing drills.
Despite an abrupt change in both responsibilities and style on the Vikings coaching staff, quarterback Kirk Cousins gave Rauscher a vote of confidence.
"It isn't a major transition," Cousins said. "Can't say enough about his experience. He coached with Bill Callahan in Washington, who I was able to work with in Washington. There's some similarities there. He goes way back even with this scheme back to Denver. He's played the position of center so he knows his stuff and has great command of our offense."
honestly, i cant imagine having an OL coach that isnt loud, crude, and abrasive.
Or doesnt need one of these...
![[Image: CvyxGZUWEAALx0M.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvyxGZUWEAALx0M.jpg)
|
