Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Birdies releasing Kirko...
#11
(Yesterday, 02:28 PM)MaroonBells Wrote: There is no problem. He's definitely someone who should be in the running, and likely near the top. People hate this or that idea "because he hasn't won a Super Bowl" or "we already tried that" or "he's too old" or "he doesn't fit our offense" or "he doesn't fit our culture." 

To that I say, all QBs in your 20s who've won a Super Bowl, haven't played for us before, and who fit our offense and culture, please take one step forward.

If he could have taken a step forward he wouldn't have gotten hit so much and the OL wouldn't have  looked as bad.  Between kirks total lack of mobility to extend plays,  and KOC'S play designs,  its a disaster plan.  Think about how many hits Wentz took,  kirk is less mobile..
Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?
[-] The following 3 users Like JimmyinSD's post:
  
Reply

#12
(Yesterday, 04:46 PM)JimmyinSD Wrote: If he could have taken a step forward he wouldn't have gotten hit so much and the OL wouldn't have  looked as bad.  Between kirks total lack of mobility to extend plays,  and KOC'S play designs,  its a disaster plan.  Think about how many hits Wentz took,  kirk is less mobile..

He's also a much, MUCH better quarterback...or at least he was 2 years ago. And therein lies my concern with him. He was OK in Atlanta, but not up to his standards. Is he washed? Or would he once again look fantastic in this offense? Dunno, but it's a give and take. There is no perfect option.
Reply

#13
(Yesterday, 04:46 PM)JimmyinSD Wrote: If he could have taken a step forward he wouldn't have gotten hit so much and the OL wouldn't have  looked as bad.  Between kirks total lack of mobility to extend plays,  and KOC'S play designs,  its a disaster plan.  Think about how many hits Wentz took,  kirk is less mobile..

Kirko's lack of mobility now is a big hinderance and one of my main concerns, along with his current arm strength. Cousins is not KOC's ideal QB by any stretch, but as others have said there's just no perfect option.
Reply

#14
Personally I think Derek Carrwashed is somehow less washed than Kirk and doesn't come with the same baggage. Sticking with Carr as my pick to backup JJM.

If the team is truly done with McCarthy and they're bringing someone in with hope that they start the entire season, then they should be aiming higher than either Carr or Kirk.

Really nice signing of Kirk by Atlanta, by the way. Very well thought out and executed all around. Money well spent.
Reply

#15
(6 hours ago)pattersaur Wrote: Personally I think Derek Carrwashed is somehow less washed than Kirk and doesn't come with the same baggage. Sticking with Carr as my pick to backup JJM.

That's my choice as well as I think Derek still has some decent juice.
Reply

#16
I would prefer Kirk to many of the options out there. Knows the offense, if our line stabilizes, he would be a good fit. A few years removed from last success with us, but certainly much better than a 5 years washed out Wilson or someone like Murray.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 Melroy van den Berg.