(12-07-2025, 10:19 AM)JimmyinSD Wrote: I see the line has flipped on this one, apparently Daniels is a 3 point swing. Vikes were 1.5 point favs. Not 1.5 point dogs.
I'd say that rivals the Bungles' game for Vegas being full of s**t.
(50 minutes ago)purplefaithful Wrote: I think the Wilfs can be faulted for some really bad hires over the years and for an org that isnt as football savvy as I would have liked. This manifests itself today with a front office that is less than stellar imo.
But I dont buy into the narrative they dont want to win. In fact, they are probably too much a fan and its clouded their decision making.
Everyone has to decide the amount of emotional capital they want to put into supporting a pro team. For me that has ebbed and flowed as I age out.
Its easy and fun when you're winning - those Eagle fans looked like they were having fun at SoFi last night - least till the end. I envy that.
The Wilfs are real estate tycoons...they're used to seeing investments take time to pay off. They likely have a better understanding of that basic concept than most.
They also understand when to cut losses and switch staff, sell underperforming properties, and taking long looks at trusted employees.
For any and all 'misses' on draft pics, etc, I'm sure they'll be diplomatic but direct at upgrading/changing the scouting department and/or the decision tree on young prospects.
I'm also certain that they'll never hire from the collective that feels the need to do 5,000 mock drafts every year.
OK, KOC, time for that miracle....
