Posts: 1,540
Threads: 281
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
943
(Yesterday, 11:14 AM)JustInTime Wrote: Hmmm
I believe someone REALLY liked the idea of adding a S in this past draft. Mettelus being in the last year of his deal was one of a myriad of reasons to do so.
That mfer is kinda looking astute at this juncture.
That being said, I’ve got little doubt that his extension gets done.
shoring up that other IOL spot in front of our rookieish QB was more important IMO that replacing Bynum. A deep S is an easier bill to fill than apparently a quality OG. honestly that deep S is essentially a corner that is a step slow or stiff hipped. Hitmans role will be much harder to fill, but thats a story for another day, if you are going to go all in with a young QB, you better have your resources focused on keeping him clean in the pocket.... not to mention being able to generate offense on the ground.
Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?
Posts: 2,211
Threads: 275
Joined: Feb 2025
Reputation:
1,183
(Yesterday, 01:57 PM)JimmyinSD Wrote: shoring up that other IOL spot in front of our rookieish QB was more important IMO that replacing Bynum. A deep S is an easier bill to fill than apparently a quality OG. honestly that deep S is essentially a corner that is a step slow or stiff hipped. Hitmans role will be much harder to fill, but thats a story for another day, if you are going to go all in with a young QB, you better have your resources focused on keeping him clean in the pocket.... not to mention being able to generate offense on the ground.
Valid points.
If it was just replacing Bynum it’s a non issue. But, it’s Bynum, Hitman, and possibly Mettelus. And if Jackson doesn’t pan out? Yikes. That’s a world of hurt and with a $52 million dollar cap hole next year.
As Supa likes to point out, our D is pretty complex. Having a rookie in place now would have been a huge help. I love the Jackson pick, but a S and a guy like Monheim would look pretty good to me.
“Hell is empty and all the devils are here”
Shakespeare