Login

StickierBuns · 04-10-2025, 08:26 AM

(04-10-2025, 08:00 AM)MaroonBells Wrote: I think the only hand wringing about Purdy is among fans. I doubt the 49ers have even once considered not paying him.

That's my guess as well for the most part.

greediron · 04-10-2025, 11:03 AM

(04-09-2025, 06:39 PM)purplefaithful Wrote: We'll have to agree to disagree.

This gets back to why should he settle for less guaranteed?

Or less term than those 3? He's achieved more than any of them.

I dont think thats a realistic bargaining position for the 49'er front office to take, at least in this era of the NFL for a starting QB.

Not saying it is going to happen. Just that if I were running a team, I wouldn't give him a huge contract with long term implications. I would pay him a starters wage, but protect the team from being saddled by an unreasonable salary.

comet52 · (This post was last modified: 04-22-2025, 09:39 AM by comet52.)

I want the 49ers to pay tier one money to their tier two QB. This is one of the more problematic things a franchise can do nowadays and anything that weakens an NFC opponent is good for us imo.

*JimmyinSD* · 04-10-2025, 12:09 PM

(04-10-2025, 11:03 AM)greediron Wrote: Not saying it is going to happen. Just that if I were running a team, I wouldn't give him a huge contract with long term implications. I would pay him a starters wage, but protect the team from being saddled by an unreasonable salary.

I am with you, I dont see Purdy as a key part of that superbowl run, he is a decent player, but not one that makes you quit looking for an improvement, but if they hand him top tier money, they are stuck and that is a sure fire quick way to sink a rising franchise IMO.

MaroonBells · 04-10-2025, 02:04 PM

(04-10-2025, 11:28 AM)comet52 Wrote: I want the 49ers to pay tier one money to their tier two QB. This of the more problematic things a franchise can do nowadays and anything that weakens an NFC opponent is good for us imo.

I'd rather see them move on from Purdy and take a ride on the QB-go-round.

*JimmyinSD* · 04-22-2025, 06:36 AM

(04-09-2025, 06:39 PM)purplefaithful Wrote: We'll have to agree to disagree.

This gets back to why should he settle for less guaranteed?

Or less term than those 3? He's achieved more than any of them.

I dont think thats a realistic bargaining position for the 49'er front office to take, at least in this era of the NFL for a starting QB.

Didnt he end last season injured again? And/Or had offseason surgery or something with his passing arm again? I think hes been hurt at least 2 of the seasons hes been in the league, id say he has some things left to prove before you lock him up to a franchise deal.