Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dalvin yes, Dalvin no, Dalvin maybe
#1
Reply

#2
Zimspeak rule #1: If Zimmer comments on an injured player, assume the truth to be the exact opposite of what he says. 
Reply

#3
Quote: @MaroonBells said:
Zimspeak rule #1: If Zimmer comments on an injured player, assume the truth to be the exact opposite of what he says. 
Yeah I know hence the subject title. I don't really think Dalvin needs to play. It's not like they are going anywhere beyond the regular season anyway.
Reply

#4
Wetlander was right...The only way the Vikings have a chance @ GB is if Cook goes off. But they better monitor his touches. 
Reply

#5
Probably aggravates it and misses more games.  But they had to play him because..( insert reason here )?
Reply

#6
Quote: @comet52 said:
Probably aggravates it and misses more games.  But they had to play him because..( insert reason here )?
Players play when they are healthy enough, simple as that.
Reply

#7
Reply

#8
Sunday is gonna be a shi*t show.  Result won't matter if he plays or not.  No need to rush him on the field.  Give him a few more weeks.
Reply

#9
I really don't see a Vikings' victory in the forecast come Sunday...just too many things against them...
Reply

#10
Quote: @IDVikingfan said:
Sunday is gonna be a shi*t show.  Result won't matter if he plays or not.  No need to rush him on the field.  Give him a few more weeks.
But if a GM just signed a RB to a big contract, and then it turns out the team probably is going to be rebuilding through the core years of that contract...that RB better have a +1,000 yard season or that GM might have one more bad judgment to explain.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.