3 hours ago
(4 hours ago)JR44 Wrote: Because of all the QB issues last year, one aspect that went under the radar was the huge difference in the defense when either Van Ginkel or Greenard were out. Turner is not close the level of either, he had looked so badly that the bar really dropped for him so anything he did remotely positive really stood out. Do not think he is nearly ready to take over.
To Turners defense, he is only 23 and led the team in sacks by year 2.
So I wouldn't fault the Vikings for putting him in the starting line-up if that happens. He's doing exactly what they hoped most likely.
That said, I still like the Turner/Gink/Greenard rotation best
Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger!

