Question For Those Thinking On Voting For Harris

[Zanary]

God, no.

Ron's own in-house publication was racist as hell, something he blamed on his own inactivity with "his" periodical. I know he's one of the patron saints of the Libertarian Party, but he's done his own share of double-speak and unfortunate BS; the more I researched, the worse it got. It was a lot like doing the deep dive on Reagan and/or Bush Sr.

Sometimes, you don't wanna know.

But, hey, Lorne Michaels and SNL/NBC showed their typical colors over the weekend, to the surprise of absolutely no one. If they wanted to shush the voices claiming that the networks were largely in the dnc's pocket, they blew it in typically tragic/hilarious fashion...and made Harris look that extra bit desperate.

Someday, people will count higher than two during these messes. Someday.

[JimmyinSD]

I doubt there are any national level politicians that could stand up to an honest thorough deep dive into their past.

[Zanary]

I doubt there are any national level  politicians that could stand up to an honest thorough deep dive into their past.

That's why I keep hoping that we force a better level of wannabe "leader", because settling/voting for perceived "lesser evils" is f**king the country over...time and time again.

It shouldn't be wrong or impossible to push for a better class of representative/leader, but the masses keep stroking the obnoxious.

[JimmyinSD]

That's why I keep hoping that we force a better level of wannabe "leader", because settling/voting for perceived "lesser evils" is f**king the country over...time and time again.

It shouldn't be wrong or impossible to push for a better class of representative/leader, but the masses keep stroking the obnoxious.

I dont think truly good people would want the job, IMO it takes a certain type of person to even want to be out there associating with the filth that has filled DC.  IMO its going to take somebody that has been dirty, and is not afraid of getting dirty again,  but this time a different kind of dirty.  Somebody that the machine pissed off and they are out for a reckoning.  As fucked up as things are,  I am sure the scout leaders and clergy are going to be sitting out for a few rounds if we have any hope of getting our country back.

[Zanary]

I dont think truly good people would want the job, IMO it takes a certain type of person to even want to be out there associating with the filth that has filled DC.  IMO its going to take somebody that has been dirty, and is not afraid of getting dirty again,  but this time a different kind of dirty.  Somebody that the machine pissed off and they are out for a reckoning.  As fucked up as things are,  I am sure the scout leaders and clergy are going to be sitting out for a few rounds if we have any hope of getting our country back.

I don't see either "main" club fronted by people that want to take anything back for US; I see the pig-boi narcissist that is utterly out for his own attention, legal protections, and bombast, and I see the puppet on the end of the optics-are-all strings, desperately trying not to let it slip away and be relegated to cackling obscurity where her uselessness at the border and elsewhere would be her legacy.

Neither is about us, neither of their clubs have been for generations.

We don't need scout leaders, but we need more parties...for 330-340 million people, 2 is absurd...and we need some decent people to win against obnoxiousness and optics BS.