Quote: @"rf54" said:
Why do most people have CB as our clear top need? Just look at the depth chart. It is the only position that is worse than it was this time last year.
Yes if a super blue chip falls we should take him, that is how we got Randy Moss and Adrian Peterson... but is there really a player like that in this draft and will he drop to us?
It looks about the same as last year, maybe slightly better. Breeland sucked (and is gone, addition by subtraction) and we still have Peterson and Dantzler on the outside like we finished last season. Sullivan is probably better than Mac Alexander at the slot. Depth is the same. I don't see how we are any worse off.
We will add a CB early in the draft but we don't need to do it if a very good player falls to us at 12. Like say Hamilton (S) or Jermaine Johnson (edge) are available and Sauce and Stingley are already taken? You could make an argument they'd be better picks than taking a CB in terms of talent and future need.
The Vikings have done a good job of filling holes in FA to find starters and/or create competition at weak spots. The roster is competitive right now. In O'Connell and Kwesi's first year at the helm, I think they should be looking to draft with the next 3-4 years in mind, not looking at what our biggest need is this season. The chances of us reaching a Super Bowl in Year 1 with a new coaching staff are not good (and history bears that out).