01-23-2022, 03:04 PM
Quote: @purplefaithful said:
That's up to our new GM/HC to figure out.@minny65 said:
So if we trade KC, what are they going to replace him with?@purplefaithful said:
That is all true in almost every game.@minny65 said:
Tannehill is not the answer in TN.
They have all the other pieces, might they be in the QB market??
Titans OC made a few calls (especially on 3rd down) that are easy to critically judge in hind-sight....
Couple of those 3rd and shorts, when they tried to pound Henry up the middle while they had DB's playing 4/5 yards off the los? Those were easy picking 1st downs.
Maybe it was up to the QB to change the play, if they gave him the latitude to do it.
Bottom line was sometimes they were they're own worst enemy.
Back to: Tannehill is not the answer as good as his story is and he is so likeable, but they need to be in QB market - Cousins anyone??
Maybe Tannehill? You couldn't hope for more - realistically.
Anyways, we've been down the KC rabbit hole, dont mean to derail the thread.
The OP from August was about Chase but has been updated to Bengals/Titans
The Bengals are fine at QB and the Titans are a QB away. That is all I was saying.
As far as rabbit hole that is true of every debate/conversation where people have differing opinions and that is what blogs are for. I agree, too soon to start that one again but going back to Titans they need a QB because they seem to have all the other pieces IMO (which was always my mantra about what KC needs).
