FG % by distance, historical

[Bullazin]

Distance Percent # of attempts
18 Yards 100% 15
19 Yards 100% 100
20 Yards 99.51% 202
21 Yards 97.67% 215
22 Yards 98.02% 253
23 Yards 98.19% 277
24 Yards 94.62% 223
25 Yards 99.23% 261
26 Yards 96.88% 224
27 Yards 97.00% 267
28 Yards 95% 300
29 Yards 94.36% 266
30 Yards 93.07% 274
31 Yards 94.49% 272
32 Yards 94.62% 260  
33 Yards 94.10% 339
34 Yards 86.04% 265
35 Yards 90.55% 275
36 Yards 87.76% 286
37 Yards 84.75% 295  
38 Yards 83.29% 353

Great coaches should know this. 

[Guest]

Zim’s new goal is to play for the 19 yarder, thanks a lot @Bullazin… B)  

[Guest]

a 5 yard gain from 37 yards to 32 yards has a 10% difference, just sayin'

[Guest]

@Mattyman said:
a 5 yard gain from 37 yards to 32 yards has a 10% difference, just sayin'

I completely agree but if your odds improved from 84% to 94% by lining up your 40 million dollar per year QB, 2 Pro bowl receivers and a pro bowl back checking the defensive alignment to see if the play is there , dont you always do it ? 

[Guest]

So the greater the distance, the less probability of success?

Mind. blown.

[Guest]

@Kentis said:
Zim’s new goal is to play for the 19 yarder, thanks a lot @Bullazin… B)  

That would at least *be* a goal, vs. Zimmer just turtling at the earliest possible moment without any situationally strategic thought whatsoever beyond "oh stop the offense now we might fumble or something".

[Guest]

@Vanguard83 said:
So the greater the distance, the less probability of success?

Mind. blown.

Cmon Van, embrace your inner nerd-wonkiness.  B)