Turn the tables back to 2018

[Guest]

@MaroonBells said:

@greediron said:
Crickets.  But it seems to have hit a nerve.

You know, sometimes when people don't respond, it's not because you have a point. It's more often because people aren't aware you've made one. 

and your point is?

You were so afraid that you ran to another thread and went off?

[Guest]

@greediron said:

@MaroonBells said:

@greediron said:
Crickets.  But it seems to have hit a nerve.

You know, sometimes when people don't respond, it's not because you have a point. It's more often because people aren't aware you've made one. 

and your point is?

You were so afraid that you ran to another thread and went off?

I don't even know what that mean, Greed. 

[Guest]

your stupid party is broken thread.  The democrats are lying hypocrites.  But you all know that and won't argue it.

The GOP isn't much better.  I will admit that.

[Guest]

@MaroonBells said:
False equivalence. Dems claims stem from clear evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election, which has been confirmed to be true by every intelligence organization and a Senate investigation. They never claimed "voter fraud" despite having zero evidence of such.

Despite all this, Clinton still conceded the day after the election and Barack Obama hosted Trump at the White House the day after that. And while plenty of dems demonstrated in the streets over the fact that 70 million Americans must've lost their ever-loving minds, no one stormed the capital building.

Russian Interference with the election?  Too funny.  You mean the Russian bot farm that resulted in indictments that have since been dropped.  Here's a news flash...the Russians (and Chinese, Iranians, N. Koreans, et al.) have some interference in every election (and we have some interference in their "elections").  In some cases it's candidate advocacy (the Russians pushed hard for Bernie in 2020..imagine winning the cold war without firing a shot) but most of the time it's just to sow the seeds of discontent.  A divided and weakened US is their desired outcome.  The Russian "Investigation" was no more than a dog and pony show to weaken Trump and to cover for the fact that the previous Administration was using a DNC paid for, suspect "dossier" to spy on the opposing Presidential candidate.

In terms of Hillary "conceding", she still claims she would have won without the pesky Ruskies and never should have conceded.  She told Biden not to concede if he lost..... 

I am curious if anything comes from these forensic audits of the election...seems to me that one side or the other is eventually going to have an "I told you so" moment.