We Have No Answer For Chase Daniels?

[Guest]

@greediron said:

@MaroonBells said:
I actually felt a pang of dread when Trubisky went down. I didn't know who the backup was but I suspected he'd be better. Trubby is always good for 5 or 6 ridiculously inaccurate passes in a game. 

Yeah, I would like to think we had a plan for Trubisky.  I think Daniels is probably a better QB for that team with their D.
The only real issue with the D was they failed to get off the field on several 3rd downs. 

and them not getting off the field was resting the Bears D for their relentless attack on our OL.   the D did the O no favors yesterday by letting a depleted Bears O chew up yardage and clock on them.  IIRC the bears beat us in time of posession by about 11 minutes.

[Guest]

@JimmyinSD said:

@greediron said:

@MaroonBells said:
I actually felt a pang of dread when Trubisky went down. I didn't know who the backup was but I suspected he'd be better. Trubby is always good for 5 or 6 ridiculously inaccurate passes in a game. 

Yeah, I would like to think we had a plan for Trubisky.  I think Daniels is probably a better QB for that team with their D.
The only real issue with the D was they failed to get off the field on several 3rd downs. 

and them not getting off the field was resting the Bears D for their relentless attack on our OL.   the D did the O no favors yesterday by letting a depleted Bears O chew up yardage and clock on them.  IIRC the bears beat us in time of posession by about 11 minutes.

It goes both ways.  The offense turned the ball over several times.  Went 3 and out quite often.  The D actually held up pretty well after that first drive.  And as I said, except for a few times they had the bears in a 3rd and long and didn't get off the field.

[Guest]

@greediron said:

@JimmyinSD said:

@greediron said:

@MaroonBells said:
I actually felt a pang of dread when Trubisky went down. I didn't know who the backup was but I suspected he'd be better. Trubby is always good for 5 or 6 ridiculously inaccurate passes in a game. 

Yeah, I would like to think we had a plan for Trubisky.  I think Daniels is probably a better QB for that team with their D.
The only real issue with the D was they failed to get off the field on several 3rd downs. 

and them not getting off the field was resting the Bears D for their relentless attack on our OL.   the D did the O no favors yesterday by letting a depleted Bears O chew up yardage and clock on them.  IIRC the bears beat us in time of posession by about 11 minutes.

It goes both ways.  The offense turned the ball over several times.  Went 3 and out quite often.  The D actually held up pretty well after that first drive.  And as I said, except for a few times they had the bears in a 3rd and long and didn't get off the field.

the O didnt really stumble until the second half.   they were putting points up but their drives were 4:42 and 6:31 in the first half,  and despite it being a shit play for the O,  that fumble coming out of half didnt really affect the D in that they were rested from half time and were only on the field for 2 minutes before the ensuing field goal.... it went down hill after that for sure,  but by then the Bears O wasnt really doing much either.... ugly ugly game once again no matter what kind of football a fan likes to see.