10 hours ago
(11 hours ago)supafreak84 Wrote: This may seem like blasphemy, but I'd almost rather gamble on Richardson than Kyler Murray at this point. It's not what O'Connell would do, as his job hinges on acquiring a more experienced option to start, but I'd take the potential upside of the bigger, younger, athlete than what I know about the older smaller athlete who might not be as athletic after an accumulation of injuries.
(10 hours ago)JimmyinSD Wrote: of the two, I am with you. I see more upside with Richardson as well, but neither of them blow my skirt up. I wonder what a QB room of Geno for 2 years, while JJM and AR develop and compete for back up and eventual starter role would look like in a year?
C'mon fellas, you don't really believe that. One has proven he can play in the NFL and one has not. That is an enormous difference.


![[-]](https://vikefans.com/forums/images/duende_v3_local/collapse.png)