Posts: 1,583
Threads: 281
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
973
(6 hours ago)MaroonBells Wrote: I think the biggest misconception in football is that Super Bowl teams have flawless rosters with no weaknesses. Outside of the unproven QB, yes, the Vikings have a roster capable of winning the Super Bowl. Unfortunately, so do a handful of other teams.
the likelihood isnt very high, but I agree, I think when we get one its not going to be that team that is favored out of the gate due to winning the offseason with an already talented roster, its going to be some young players making huge contributions, some less than players providing more than expected, and a run of luck. could easily be this year.
Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?
Posts: 2,369
Threads: 312
Joined: Feb 2025
Reputation:
1,301
There’s probably 8-10 teams that can be considered Super Bowl “capable”. Meaning if what they are on paper actually makes it to the field.
In the NFC I’d say Philly, Washington, Detroit, Minnesota, Tampa, and LA are capable of putting together a run with good luck, good health, and they play up to expectations.
I the AFC it’s probably limited to KC, Buffalo, Baltimore and if you squint really hard Denver.
For conversations in late June, a Super Bowl contending Minnesota Vikings is not an eyebrow raising notion.
Outside of Philly, the toughest out in the NFC is the Rams. They had Philly on the ropes. Detroit is going to suffer historic levels of brain drain. Campbell will continues to be a more quotable Mike Tice. I think the final four in the NFC will be Philly, LA, Washington, and Minnesota. If JJ is White Jaden Daniels, we’re in the NFCCG, guaranteed.
“Hell is empty and all the devils are here”
Shakespeare