Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Anyone else not enjoying the Rodgers watch?
#11
[-] The following 1 user Likes StickierBuns's post:
  
Reply

#12
(2 hours ago)MAD GAINZ Wrote: Rodgers is 41 and suffered a significant lower leg injury two seasons ago.

Anyone remember how Favre played from age 40 compared to 41? Peyton Manning played great at 38 and then his play dropped dramatically at 39.

I get wanting some competition for JJ McCarthy given he just got mental training last season, but bringing in the Aaron Rodgers circus isn't what we need.  Given how much cap space we have even after all these signings, we could have easily beat Daniel Jones 1-yr deal with Indy.

But don't mind me, none of my arguments against bringing in Aaron Rodgers are valid.

No circus please; 100's of reporters, coaches driving limos to the airport, helicopters flying overhead or fans in bird costumes outside of Eagan.

I just want QB insurance at this point, in case of emergency. Its nothing new or unique as a take. Its as old as time. 

I am past bringing in competition and I think the Vikings are too - or Daniel Jones would still be here as you point out.  

My $$ is on Flacco, they're waiting to see if he signs with Giants or not. After that? Its Tannehill time.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
MAD GAINZ, pikvikes, 5 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.