11-17-2021, 12:49 PM
Quote: @JimmyinSD said:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/20...-immunity/@Mike Olson said:
Except that studies are showing a stronger and longer immune response from actually developing natural antibodies vs the vaccine that carries no long term response mechanism.( i have read some reports questioning it effectiveness past 4 to 6 months. Hence the idea of the younger population getting infected while they are at the lowest risk (virtually none) of any serious affects from the virus. Its essentially how traditional vaccines were built.@JimmyinSD said:
and now some at the CDC are basically saying herd immunity is a myth with this virus.... now that cat is out of the bag good luck with getting many more to cross over and get vaccinated. honestly I am starting to think that those of a healthy condition and low risk age should treat this like parents used to handle chicken pox with their young kids... just get exposed intentionally and get your antibodies going the natural way.
I am not anti vaccine, nor am I going to tell anybody that they have to get it, but it is discouraging, but at the same time refreshing, to have the so called experts finally admit that they are really throwing darts blind folded on this this shit.
https://www.latimes.com/science/story/20...d-immunity If true then your idea would be no better than getting the vaccination. The reason that we may have problems with herd immunity is because of mutation which is largely happening in unvaccinated or non-previously affected populations. You are still MUCH better off getting the vaccine and giving your body the tools it needs to deal with it when it encounters the virus.