Forum › The Longship › Vikings Roster Moves 10/06/2026

Vikings Roster Moves 10/06/2026

Cricket
Cricket
Mod June 2026 Trivia Champion
Joined May 2013
4,787 posts
Rep: 3,922

LIVE WELL ~ LOVE MUCH ~ LAUGH OFTEN

Liked:
#1 · Oct 6, 4:35 PM
StickierBuns
Joined May 2013
10,298 posts
Rep: 2,468

I think Teasley is trying to make a record for the most running backs signed to the team and then released within one week, lol.

My guess is a minor trade is upcoming for another RB.

edited Oct 6, 2026 4:41 PM CT
Liked:
#2 · Oct 6, 4:40 PM CT
Cricket
Cricket
Mod June 2026 Trivia Champion
Joined May 2013
4,787 posts
Rep: 3,922

LIVE WELL ~ LOVE MUCH ~ LAUGH OFTEN

Liked:
#3 · Oct 6, 5:01 PM CT
Cricket
Cricket
Mod June 2026 Trivia Champion
Joined May 2013
4,787 posts
Rep: 3,922

StickierBuns wrote:

I think Teasley is trying to make a record for the most running backs signed to the team and then released within one week, lol.
My guess is a minor trade is upcoming for another RB.

😆

LIVE WELL ~ LOVE MUCH ~ LAUGH OFTEN

Liked:
#4 · Oct 6, 5:02 PM CT
MA
Joined Apr 2026
29 posts
Rep: 30

I mean, at some point you have to say that the team did not manage the RB roster appropriately. They decided to go with 3 RBs to start the season- Jones, Mason, and Claiborne. Did they really think Jones was going to make it through the whole season without being injured given his age and injury history? Maybe Scott was their fallback but he got poached early by the Bears.

The team is not comfortable with just Jones/Claiborne, I assume they wouldn’t be comfortable with just Mason/Claiborne. So they then cycle through RBs on the practice squad.

Now there are rumors of trading for a RB? How about just keeping an extra RB on the roster you can trust to get you through an injury to one of them? We have seen this cycle repeat itself in the past with KoC/KAM - ie. the trading for Cam Akers in multiple years.

Maybe they will try to survive with Jones/Claiborne and call up Austime for the NO game until Mason is back after the bye. It’s kind of baffling to me that they didn’t plan for this possibility a little better.

Liked:
#5 · Oct 6, 6:07 PM CT
JustInTime
Joined Feb 2025
5,197 posts
Rep: 3,933

“Hell is empty and all the devils are here”

Shakespeare 

Liked:
#6 · Oct 6, 6:30 PM CT
JustInTime
Joined Feb 2025
5,197 posts
Rep: 3,933

Could have had several RBs from the 25 RB class. Instead, we have a punt gunner.

Christ almighty.

“Hell is empty and all the devils are here”

Shakespeare 

Liked:
#7 · Oct 6, 6:32 PM CT
JR44
Joined Aug 2017
892 posts
Rep: 1,093

Magnus1018 wrote:

I mean, at some point you have to say that the team did not manage the RB roster appropriately. They decided to go with 3 RBs to start the season- Jones, Mason, and Claiborne. Did they really think Jones was going to make it through the whole season without being injured given his age and injury history? Maybe Scott was their fallback but he got poached early by the Bears.

Agree 100%. Scott clearly outplayed outplayed Clairborne in pre season and should have made the team over him, if not keep them both, which would have been justified with Jones injury history.

Liked:
#8 · Oct 6, 6:33 PM CT
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum › The Longship › Vikings Roster Moves 10/06/2026
Return to top ↑

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!

You belong here, Vikings fan.

Join the VikeFans community to share your takes, react to posts, and talk Vikings with fans who get it.