Forum The Longship ANALYSIS. Why the Vikings’ Kyler Murray-Kevin O’Co...

ANALYSIS. Why the Vikings’ Kyler Murray-Kevin O’Connell pairing is a good fit

SA
Joined May 2013
100 posts
Rep: 102

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7122822/2026/03/17/kyler-murray-kevin-oconnell-vikings/

Ted Nguyen
Alec Lewis
By Ted Nguyen and Alec Lewis
March 17, 2026 6:00 am EDT

This football experiment features two fascinating ingredients. You have Minnesota Vikings head coach Kevin O’Connell, one of the league’s most respected passing game designers. And you have former No. 1 overall pick Kyler Murray, an undersized but electric quarterback talent.

Blend the two, and what will the end product look like? The results could go a long way toward defining the 2026 season.

Already, skepticism exists. Under O’Connell, the Vikings have taken an under-center, timing-based approach. Murray, meanwhile, is perceived to be primarily an out-of-structure playmaker. When Murray signed last Thursday, the first question posed to O’Connell was about how these two worlds planned to coalesce.

“When you actually dive in and really study Kyler’s experience at the position,” O’Connell said, “you do see a lot of really, really great qualities that fit into some of the things we ask quarterbacks to do.”

Our goal with this story? To take a clear-eyed look at this alliance by evaluating the tape, advanced metrics and conversations with staffers around the league.

The summary of findings supports O’Connell’s perspective. This coach and quarterback marriage makes sense when you dig beneath the surface — even if both sides will need to adapt some to maximize their partnership.

Deeper dive/Rest of article. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7122822/2026/03/17/kyler-murray-kevin-oconnell-vikings/

#1 · Mar 17, 7:48 AM
Still Hurtn
Joined Aug 2019
200 posts
Rep: 290

Im expecting Murray to be a better version of 2017 Case Keenum. Scrappy, clutch, and winning

#2 · Mar 17, 12:45 PM
greediron
greediron
Mod
Joined May 2013
681 posts
Rep: 796

The problem with off-schedule plays is that they are off-schedule. You can't plan them and can't sustain drives based on them. OCs need a plan, to build on their plays and call based off that. Off-schedule plays are exciting and make the fans happy, but they really aren't that great for a team.

#3 · Mar 18, 1:40 PM
SA
Joined May 2013
100 posts
Rep: 102
greediron wrote:
The problem with off-schedule plays is that they are off-schedule.  You can't plan them and can't sustain drives based on them.  OCs need a plan, to build on their plays and call based off that.  Off-schedule plays are exciting and make the fans happy, but they really aren't that great for a team.

The plays don’t start off-schedule, they become that, of course. 

Isn’t another way to call them “extending the plays”? And usually referred to as a positive QB ability?

Also take heart that KM’s pocket efficiency ranked only behind DMaye last year.  ;)

Many here lamented the fact that defenses always knew where to find Cousins (easier to pass rush).  Those lamenters should be happy we have a QB with A+ extendability, when he’s not gimpy.

#4 · Mar 18, 5:39 PM
greediron
greediron
Mod
Joined May 2013
681 posts
Rep: 796
savannahskol wrote:

The plays don’t start off-schedule, they become that, of course. 

Isn’t another way to call them “extending the plays”? And usually referred to as a positive QB ability?

Also take heart that KM’s pocket efficiency ranked only behind DMaye last year.  ;)

Many here lamented the fact that defenses always knew where to find Cousins (easier to pass rush).  Those lamenters should be happy we have a QB with A+ extendability, when he’s not gimpy.

having the ability to do that is great.  Having that be the majority of your offense is not.  But you knew that already.

#5 · Mar 18, 6:38 PM
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
3,478 posts
Rep: 4,142

Vikings OL is gonna love or hate blocking for Kyler...They aint used to someone so athletic back there, although McCarthy was hardly immobile (I.e. Kirko)

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

#6 · Mar 18, 7:12 PM
MA
Joined Aug 2017
398 posts
Rep: 452

The Spread and Shred Offense.

#7 · Mar 19, 4:03 AM
MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
3,235 posts
Rep: 4,468
savannahskol wrote:

The plays don’t start off-schedule, they become that, of course. 

Isn’t another way to call them “extending the plays”? And usually referred to as a positive QB ability?

Also take heart that KM’s pocket efficiency ranked only behind DMaye last year.  ;)

Many here lamented the fact that defenses always knew where to find Cousins (easier to pass rush).  Those lamenters should be happy we have a QB with A+ extendability, when he’s not gimpy.

One of the more interesting comments I saw on Twitter during Kyler week was the fact that KOC-coached receivers are particularly good at breaking off or extending their routes when the pocket collapses and the QB has to improvise. There were a few examples of that with Darnold. Nobody's better at that than Murray.

But you're right. That isn't the goal; the goal is to execute the play. And given the fact that our surround is significantly better than what Kyler is used to, I'm guessing we see a little less of the toddler with a cellphone.

#8 · Mar 19, 7:17 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship ANALYSIS. Why the Vikings’ Kyler Murray-Kevin O’Co...

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!