Vikings QB Purgatory: Watching the Ones We Missed
It’s been reported the Vikings wanted Drake Maye in the '24 draft and couldn’t get there.
They helped revitalize Sam Darnold’s career in '25… then watched him cash in and head to Seattle.
The worst-case scenario has played out; Vikings fans end up watching two quarterbacks they were directly tied to over the last two years playing in the Super Bowl, while we’re once again on the outside looking in.
That’s the part that’s maddening. Not that there's a plan, but that the pain doesn’t stop while the plan develops. We get to watch the “what ifs” cash in elsewhere while we’re told to be patient again.
I still believe McCarthy can be the guy, and if he is, all of this angst fades fast. But until then, this stretch is brutal as a fan. Competitive enough to care, close enough to dream, and just far enough away to keep ripping the wound back open every January.
Maybe this is the bridge to getting it right. It just doesn’t make the waiting any easier.
MaroonBells wrote:
Truer words...
If my options are Darnold at $40M per (the franchise tag, the only way we could've kept him), with the $40M cap hit that goes with it, and no one else....or JJ McCarthy going into his 2nd season in the offense, on a rookie contract, along with Kelly, Fries, Hargrave, Allen, etc...I think I make the same decision they did. I think most of us do. And it would've been just as "wrong" as the decision they made.
And while we judge the decision to go with JJ "wrong," it's an oversimplification that doesn't account for a few realities. For example, it doesn't take into account that JJ missed seven games due to injuries, stunting his development, and obviously not something that could have been foreseen by anyone. Still, he finished the year strong. In his last 4 games, he had 7 total TDs and 2 INTs. If you give him those 7 games back, I think the results we saw at the end of the year probably happen 7 weeks earlier, probably early enough to make the playoffs. And then are we even having this conversation?
In the short term, not keeping Darnold turned out to be a mistake. The long term is yet to be written. The majority of people on this board including myself felt letting Darnold go and going with JJ and investing in free agents was the way to go. At the time the decision was made, it was logical and correct.
History and hindsight rendered the decision incorrect. But you would have to have been some kind of soothsayer or psychic to see such a mess on the Oline and JJ's struggles coming.
Fans are left with another off season with a franchise QB question and Oline questions.
The Vikings have a pretty good team. Let's see if KOC can do for JJ what he did for Darnold.
JimmyinSD wrote:
Yet Chicago and Washington are also going through a 'rebuild' and no Superbowl. The Patriots had the easiest schedule in the NFL and Bo Nix broke his ankle and Stidham made Brosmer look like an All Pro.
Always easy to use the anomaly instead of the norm. Patriots won 4 games the year before last...4 games the year prior to that....8 games the year before that. Think they might have had some opportunities to draft some good players? Yet Minnesota won 14 games the year before this last season.
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.