Forum The Longship Brandel could move to Center

Brandel could move to Center

MaroonBells
Joined Jan 2014
3,235 posts
Rep: 4,468
#1 · Oct 14, 1:01 PM
supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,318 posts
Rep: 1,433
JimmyinSD wrote:

His Second start ever as a center....ever....in his life.... Wentz sucked ass today,  one play is no excuse for the way he played.

Well...why are we having to force the issue? The answer is because our GM signed a veteran with prior concussion issues who is now shockingly having concussion issues, and the reason he signed him is because they didn't trust his draft pick Jurgens to handle the job. So when you don't have options you are forced to do stupid things like play Brandel at center, who like you said...second start at center...ever...in his life and it cost us today. Not the sole reason we lost, but he was involved in a series of costly plays today.

#22 · Oct 19, 7:02 PM
JimmyinSD
JimmyinSD
Admin
Joined May 2013
1,754 posts
Rep: 1,867
supafreak84 wrote:

Well...why are we having to force the issue? The answer is because our GM signed a veteran with prior concussion issues who is now shockingly having concussion issues, and the reason he signed him is because they didn't trust his draft pick Jurgens to handle the job. So when you don't have options you are forced to do stupid things like play Brandel at center, who like you said...second start at center...ever...in his life and it cost us today. Not the sole reason we lost, but he was involved in a series of costly plays today.


Brandel is a long way down on why we lost today.

Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?

#23 · Oct 19, 7:05 PM
supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,318 posts
Rep: 1,433
JimmyinSD wrote:
Brandel is a long way down on why we lost today.

I'll disagree. If you take away the pressure he gave up that resulted in the Wentz INT for a touchdown...it's a different game considering the final point differential. 

You can hate on Wentz, but he threw for over 300 yards today, had some great scrambles to extend drives, and we've see much worse QB performances in Minnesota.

#24 · Oct 19, 7:20 PM
comet52
Joined Sep 2013
682 posts
Rep: 1,049
supafreak84 wrote:

Well...why are we having to force the issue? The answer is because our GM signed a veteran with prior concussion issues who is now shockingly having concussion issues, and the reason he signed him is because they didn't trust his draft pick Jurgens to handle the job. So when you don't have options you are forced to do stupid things like play Brandel at center, who like you said...second start at center...ever...in his life and it cost us today. Not the sole reason we lost, but he was involved in a series of costly plays today.

Bradbury was let go due to lousy play but now plays well in New England.  Ingram sucked but now is highly rated by PFF at Houston.  See a pattern?

#25 · Oct 19, 7:49 PM
JimmyinSD
JimmyinSD
Admin
Joined May 2013
1,754 posts
Rep: 1,867
supafreak84 wrote:

I'll disagree. If you take away the pressure he gave up that resulted in the Wentz INT for a touchdown...it's a different game considering the final point differential. 

You can hate on Wentz, but he threw for over 300 yards today, had some great scrambles to extend drives, and we've see much worse QB performances in Minnesota.

2 plays dont make a game,  Wentz missed a lot of open plays. Our clock management was total shit and play calling only marginally better.  Brandel was the least of our issues.

Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?

#26 · Oct 19, 8:59 PM
supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,318 posts
Rep: 1,433
JimmyinSD wrote:

2 plays dont make a game,  Wentz missed a lot of open plays. Our clock management was total shit and play calling only marginally better.  Brandel was the least of our issues.

This is the NFL and 2 plays can absolutely make a game. Mistakes by Brandel cost us two touchdowns and having to settle for a long field goal on the first drive after he launched the snap over Wentz's head. If you want to argue the holding penalty shouldn't have been holding, fine, but his other mistakes cost us points in a 6 point loss. He wasn't pulled for Jurgens in the second half because he was playing great football today. There's enough blame to go around, but Brandel certainly played his part

#27 · Oct 19, 9:13 PM
JR44
Joined Aug 2017
603 posts
Rep: 840
JustInTime wrote:
https://x.com/firstandskol/status/1979973701702496632?s=46&t=TjjB9Q4BmOwmN74RrrMjoQ

There’s no way on god’s green earth that’s a hold.

There was a hold, but it was on the DL, not Brandel, one of worst calls you will ever see.  Refs were so one sided all game.

#28 · Oct 19, 9:16 PM
JimmyinSD
JimmyinSD
Admin
Joined May 2013
1,754 posts
Rep: 1,867
supafreak84 wrote:

This is the NFL and 2 plays can absolutely make a game. Mistakes by Brandel cost us two touchdowns and having to settle for a long field goal on the first drive after he launched the snap over Wentz's head. If you want to argue the holding penalty shouldn't have been holding, fine, but his other mistakes cost us points in a 6 point loss. He wasn't pulled for Jurgens in the second half because he was playing great football today. There's enough blame to go around, but Brandel certainly played his part

You assume that snap cost 6 points, but they still got a FG IIRC,   based on the rest of the day I think it likely was a wash as they weren't making TDs yesterday.

Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?

#29 · Oct 20, 5:45 AM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Brandel could move to Center

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!