Vikings never in on Flacco?
I'm sticking with my original thought Ryan Tannehill.
According to KSTP's Darren Wolfson, the Vikings weren't in on either player.
"They were not in on Drew Lock, they were not in on Joe Flacco," Wolfson said on SKOR North. "In fact, Joe Flacco's representation was trying to get Joe here. He thought it was a very logical fit. He loved the idea, Joe's representation, of Joe being here. But the Vikings never took the bait. The Vikings never made an offer in the end."
They obviously have a target and we'll find out what that is either during the Draft (trading for QB2) or on April 29th. Everyone wants to come to Minnesota! ;)
JustInTime wrote:
Wouldn’t he be in the fold by now? Unless he’d apply to the comp pick formula?
Good question. I thought somehow it does impact the comp formula, but that's seems odd that it would now that we talk about it out loud. Hmmm.
Was it Vikings or bust for Rodgers?
Yahoo Sports
@YahooSports
·
11h
REPORT: Aaron Rodgers is more likely to retire than sign with a team that's not a Super Bowl contender, per CBS' @AKinkhabwala.
The Steelers are the favorites to sign the veteran QB but have not heard an update since meeting on March 21 ?
Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)
Warn Poster
Suspend User (3 days)
The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.