Forum The Longship A-aron

A-aron

supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,318 posts
Rep: 1,433

Maybe I missed it in the threads somewhere but Albert Breer reporting as of last night, the Vikings were discussing the idea of making Rodgers an offer. Breers best guess was the Vikings will "throw their hat in the ring" and try to sign him.

This is why we haven't made a move for backup QB yet

#1 · Mar 14, 7:22 AM
supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,318 posts
Rep: 1,433

If Rodgers signs here it's to be the starter. Any talk of him signing on to be a backup to McCarthy is nonsense and if that was the scenario given to him by the Vikings, he would have signed in Pittsburgh already. Remember just a couple weeks ago there was concern with McCarthy recovery and putting back on body weight? It might not be the worst idea to have JJ starting the season as the backup and taking real practice reps. That doesn't mean he doesn't get a chance to start at some point during the season.

#22 · Mar 14, 11:10 AM
Vikergirl
Joined May 2013
494 posts
Rep: 670

I just want to see what JJM has. He already lost a year. I don't want any more washed retreads

You're only given a little spark of madness. You mustn't lose it. — Robin Williams

#23 · Mar 14, 11:13 AM
WA
Joined Jan 2018
628 posts
Rep: 157
supafreak84 wrote:
If Rodgers signs here it's to be the starter. Any talk of him signing on to be a backup to McCarthy is nonsense and if that was the scenario given to him by the Vikings, he would have signed in Pittsburgh already. Remember just a couple weeks ago there was concern with McCarthy recovery and putting back on body weight? It might not be the worst idea to have JJ starting the season as the backup and taking real practice reps. That doesn't mean he doesn't get a chance to start at some point during the season.
Usually agree with you, but I just don’t see a scenario where he signs on as the starter unless the injury is a long term issue.  That was not a complex surgery.
#24 · Mar 14, 11:14 AM
JustInTime
Joined Feb 2025
1,974 posts
Rep: 1,513

Are we getting 2021 Rodgers?

Sign me up.

2024 Rodgers isn’t worth the distraction or drama. 

I hate that this is still a story.

“Hell is empty and all the devils are here”

Shakespeare 

#25 · Mar 14, 11:19 AM
supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,318 posts
Rep: 1,433
Waterboy wrote:
Usually agree with you, but I just don’t see a scenario where he signs on as the starter unless the injury is a long term issue.  That was not a complex surgery.

Why sign on to be a backup when he could sign on to the starter in Pittsburgh or New York?  Again, it really boils down to do the Vikings think they are better off for this upcoming season with Rodgers starting or JJ starting on what most agree is a championship caliber roster. I really think the Vikings are considering the best way to play this on all levels and Rodgers is giving them the time to do so because Minnesota is his preferred destination by a large margin.

#26 · Mar 14, 11:26 AM
WA
Joined Jan 2018
628 posts
Rep: 157
Usupafreak84 wrote:

Why sign on to be a backup when he could sign on to the starter in Pittsburgh or New York?  Again, it really boils down to do the Vikings think they are better off for this upcoming season with Rodgers starting or JJ starting on what most agree is a championship caliber roster. I really think the Vikings are considering the best way to play this on all levels and Rodgers is giving them the time to do so because Minnesota is his preferred destination by a large margin.

He didn’t play well enough last year to get a guaranteed starter job over McCarthy. If he’s guaranteed a starting job in any capacity, that’s terrible news for the Vikes

#27 · Mar 14, 11:38 AM
Kentis
Joined Oct 2013
541 posts
Rep: 931

#28 · Mar 14, 11:39 AM
supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,318 posts
Rep: 1,433
Waterboy wrote:

He didn’t play well enough last year to get a guaranteed starter job over McCarthy. If he’s guaranteed a starting job in any capacity, that’s terrible news for the Vikes

He threw for almost 4,000 yards and 28 TD's coming off a blown achillies. Not bad for a 41 year old guy and he played better as the year went on. We have no idea on McCarthy. So you are looking at taking a known quantity (even at his age) over an unknown quantity in McCarthy. We have one of the best rosters in the league and that's why this is even being considered

#29 · Mar 14, 11:58 AM
pattersaur
Joined Jul 2017
722 posts
Rep: 720

I'm with Supa. Unfortunately I think if we bring him in, it's probably to start. Otherwise why bother.

But I don't think the Vikings will sign Rodgers or Kupp. Hopefully just agents posturing.

#30 · Mar 14, 12:12 PM
BigAl99
Joined May 2013
133 posts
Rep: 136

I just don't want the guy on the team I cheer for.  There is no facet of the guy I like.

edited Mar 14, 2025 12:23 PM
#31 · Mar 14, 12:23 PM
Vikergirl
Joined May 2013
494 posts
Rep: 670

You're only given a little spark of madness. You mustn't lose it. — Robin Williams

#32 · Mar 14, 1:36 PM
AGRforever
Joined Sep 2014
535 posts
Rep: 610

The Jets not only kicked him to the curb. They decided $49,000,000 in dead cap was worth it. Then they decided Justin Fields is better.

Don’t touch that douche bag with a ten foot pole.

#33 · Mar 14, 1:47 PM
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
3,478 posts
Rep: 4,142

I honestly dont know how Rogers would be received by Viking fans at USB? 

He aint as lovable as Favre was by any means. But I always respected him as a surgeon on the field. 

I remember being at Favre's first game at the Metrodome, fans warmed to him right away.

The td pass to Greg Lewis cemented that relationship pretty much then and there. 

edited Mar 14, 2025 2:06 PM

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

#34 · Mar 14, 1:59 PM
MA
Joined Apr 2024
612 posts
Rep: 1,430
medaille wrote:

I don’t really think much of what you said was valid at all.  The Packers were in a different spot.  They had already been paying him big bucks for a while.  They had a young QB approaching the end of their contract that they would have to either commit to or move on from, and they had to figure out what they had in him.  We could theoretically do two more years of Rodgers before ending up in the same spot with JJM.

The Jets are a disaster organization.  We’re not.  They gave him what he wanted or at least what they could obtain that he wanted.  They shouldn’t have.  They had a defensive HC and no real plan on offense.  We have an offensive HC who has a very firm grip on the scheme.  He wouldn’t be bringing Rodgers in and hiring the shit coordinator that Rodgers had and having a hands off approach to the offense.  Then their meddling owner fired the strongest coach on the staff and their defense went to shit.  Like assuming that Rodgers hasn’t fallen off a cliff since last year, I’d expect a much better performance out of Rodgers in our system compared to their system.  I would fully trust KOC to figure out some sort of compromise scheme that balances what Rodgers was most comfortable with, with what his scheme has done well with into something that is cohesive and makes everyone happy.

I just think it comes down to how much you like JJM and how stubborn Rodgers is being on money and years.  I wouldn’t give Rodgers a two year contract, unless there are void years in play just for cap purposes.  I think if you really, really like JJM, like how much KC like Mahomes, you roll the dice.  If Rodgers is stuck on getting a multiple year deal, let him go.  I think the thing that is most pro-Rodgers is Flores.  How many more successful defenses can we have before he’s given another HC job?  That is the biggest time constraint we have.  If he leaves our defense needs to have much more talent to get the same output.  Maybe they feel pressured to maximize things while he’s here.

You're entitled to your own opinion, but the fact is two organizations have moved on from him in the past 3 years. Something isn't right. Not sure why anyone would think he's magically going to revert to MVP form.  He's 41 and isn't all about football anymore.

#35 · Mar 14, 2:14 PM
Zanary
Joined May 2013
1,047 posts
Rep: 674

What is known: he's a whiner, a complete d-bag, the definition of a narcissistic opportunist, a diva, and honestly...he looks as challenged as any QB when he doesn't have excellent pass protection. In his peak years, his line regularly gave him amounts of time that Darnold could earn a ring with. In games where that wasn't true? He'd look pretty average.

I don't understand, I actually can't fathom, anyone wanting him on the team. He got his ring with a team that had been building around its QB position for years, and that championship is now old enough to be picking out its classes for high school. His main achievement since then has been getting kicked out of the playoffs by SF.

KOC, JJM, Flores...make a good plan, or you'll be following Kwesi....

#36 · Mar 14, 2:51 PM
Kentis
Joined Oct 2013
541 posts
Rep: 931

Do these come in purple…?  :cool: :angel:

#37 · Mar 14, 3:00 PM
AGRforever
Joined Sep 2014
535 posts
Rep: 610

Just say no to drugs people

#38 · Mar 15, 2:42 AM
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
3,478 posts
Rep: 4,142

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

#39 · Mar 15, 11:10 AM
supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,318 posts
Rep: 1,433

Reportedly looking for "Sam Darnold money" as far as a contract goes.

#40 · Mar 15, 12:31 PM
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
3,478 posts
Rep: 4,142

Aaron Rodgers may choose to retire from the NFL if he doesn't get his way in free agency, according to The Athletic.

As the former MVP reportedly considers offers from the New York Giants and Pittsburgh Steelers, he would prefer to sign with the Minnesota Vikings, according to the outlet.

If Rodgers doesn't get an offer from Minnesota, he may retire.

The Vikings have an opening for a veteran quarterback after last year's starter, Sam Darnold, signed with the Seattle Seahawks. However, Minnesota also has former Michigan national champion J.J. McCarthy, the team's first-round pick in the 2024 draft.

Rodgers, at 41 years old, is not considered a long-term solution for any team.

Famed NFL agent Leigh Steinberg, who has negotiated contracts for multiple Hall of Fame quarterbacks, told Fox News Digital he envisions Minnesota as a "positive fit" for Rodgers at this stage in his career, especially due to McCarthy's presence as a potential protégé and the team being suited to win in the short-term.

"So, you need to have a situation where, because Aaron at best maybe plays another year, maybe plays another two years, but it's not a permanent solution, so it's a one- or two-year fix," Steinberg said. "So, he could go to a team that's really good but just needs that last little piece to put them over the top, and he could mentor a younger quarterback."

Steinberg also believes a team without a chance to win in the short term with no young quarterback on its roster would not be as good a fit. The Giants are a team that fits that mold. The Steelers may have had a winning record last season but aren't a shoo-in to be good again this year. They also don't have a young project quarterback.

"A team that's really dissatisfied with their quarterbacking that takes him wouldn't be as positive of a solution," Steinberg said.

If Rodgers does end up getting an offer from the Vikings and signing with them, he would follow a nearly identical career path to that of his Green Bay Packer predecessor, Brett Favre. Like Favre, Rodgers played the vast majority of his career with the Packers, winning a Super Bowl before being traded to the New York Jets. Favre then spent his final two years on the Vikings.

FoxNewsDigital

edited Mar 15, 2025 1:02 PM

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

#41 · Mar 15, 1:01 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship A-aron

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!