Forum The Longship Patriots waive KJ Osborne

Patriots waive KJ Osborne

supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,318 posts
Rep: 1,433

Sounds like it was a mutual parting. Any interest here in the Vikings bringing him back for the stretch run?

#1 · Dec 10, 11:39 AM
purplefaithful
Joined May 2013
3,478 posts
Rep: 4,142

I'd take him as a #3 in a heart-beat.

Hurry-up Vikings, we ain't getting any younger! 

#2 · Dec 10, 11:42 AM
AGRforever
Joined Sep 2014
535 posts
Rep: 610

Powell hasn't shown up at all this year which has been interesting. I doubt KJ would subplant speedy though?

#3 · Dec 10, 12:02 PM
supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,318 posts
Rep: 1,433
AGRforever wrote:
Powell hasn't shown up at all this year which has been interesting.  I doubt KJ would subplant speedy though?

I think Osborn has proven to be more consistent than either Powell or Nailor, and he knows the offense. I'd certainly kick those tires

#4 · Dec 10, 12:08 PM
badgervike
Joined Jan 2014
644 posts
Rep: 781

https://atozsports.com/nfl/minnesota-vikings-news/vikings-late-season-reunion-kj-osborn-justin-jefferson-sam-darnold/

#5 · Dec 10, 12:38 PM
Montana Tom
Joined May 2013
686 posts
Rep: 1,239

Yup, I had posted this about an hour ago.
I have liked Powell and Nailor has had glimpses, but both have made unforced errors.
But so did KJ. KJ showed he was capable of some big plays when Jets was double covered.
But KJ dropped a few too many for my liking last season, which made him expendable.
Glad I don't have to make this decision.

edited Dec 10, 2024 12:51 PM
#6 · Dec 10, 12:49 PM
pattersaur
Joined Jul 2017
722 posts
Rep: 720

Nailor and Powell have been mostly ghosts. KJ was disappointing last year but has shown a lot more than the other two. I'd be surprised if the Vikings didn't sign him.

edited Dec 10, 2024 12:54 PM
#7 · Dec 10, 12:54 PM
WA
Joined Jan 2018
628 posts
Rep: 157
StickierBuns wrote:
Not an area of need.....why sign him?

Mostly because it is indeed an area of need?  :)

#8 · Dec 10, 1:38 PM
WA
Joined Jan 2018
628 posts
Rep: 157
StickierBuns wrote:

How? Over Nailor? Speedy is a better player. Powell is the punt returner. Viking's fan need to move on, lol.

Osborn was a much more dependable no. 3 receiver when he was here than Nailor.  Maybe he has regressed, but he has the potential to bring some stability as the no. 3 receiver, something that Nailor hasn't yet demonstrated.  Nailor is ideally a four with big play ability, but isn't a down to down possession type like Osborn.

#9 · Dec 10, 2:12 PM
supafreak84
Joined Jan 2014
1,318 posts
Rep: 1,433
Waterboy wrote:

Osborn was a much more dependable no. 3 receiver when he was here than Nailor.  Maybe he has regressed, but he has the potential to bring some stability as the no. 3 receiver, something that Nailor hasn't yet demonstrated.  Nailor is ideally a four with big play ability, but isn't a down to down possession type like Osborn.

I'd agree with this. I'm actually a little surprised Trishton Jackson hasn't gotten more of an opportunity.

#10 · Dec 10, 2:25 PM
badgervike
Joined Jan 2014
644 posts
Rep: 781

KJ was a good route receiver but he did drop some easy ones and would have to get familiar with Darnold.  The receiver room is on a roll right now...not sure you want to mess with their mojo.  Who's the odd man out?  Powell returns punts.  Speedy has the ability to take the lid off if you're struggling with protection.  Jackson?

#11 · Dec 10, 2:47 PM
JimmyinSD
JimmyinSD
Admin
Joined May 2013
1,754 posts
Rep: 1,867

I dont think KJ is nearly as effective with SD at QB as he was with KC, Kirk tended to throw to the tighter covered receivers than SD does, and KJ isnt exactly fleet of foot or overly elusive so I think by SDs definition of covered, KJ would rarely be a viable target.

all this said, I think he would be a better target of the 3 if SD was more comfortable throwing to a covered receiver.

edited Dec 10, 2024 3:14 PM

Why isn't Chuck Foreman in the Hall of Fame?

#12 · Dec 10, 3:13 PM
Log in to reply.

Edit Post (mod action — author will see a notice)

Warn Poster

Suspend User (3 days)

The user will be suspended for 3 days and will receive an email with the reason and information about how to appeal.

Forum The Longship Patriots waive KJ Osborne

Welcome to VikeFans!

Welcome back, Skol fans! This is our new home. Log in with your username or email and your existing password.


Be sure to check out the How To's and Questions forum for guides on getting around the new site, and use the Help Request forum if you run into anything that you need help with. Skol!