Right now, if you are the NY Giants....

MaroonBells wrote:

OK, but they had pick #6. They took Daniel Jones at pick #6. Would you rather have Daniel Jones or Malik Nabers?

I think their reasoning was we can either draft a QB here. Appr 50/50 odds on that. Or we can draft a generational receiver in Nabers and give Jones one more chance with better weapons. WRs aren't a sure thing either but the odds are far better. And if you draft a QB there, like Jones, he still has no one to throw to. Why were the Vikings the best destination for a QB. Because we had elite weapons in place.

I also think they wanted to give Jones another chance to justify his salary with a WR of Nabers caliber...and if it doesn't work you get the QB next year, but guess what? Now you have an elite year-two WR for him to throw to. If I'm the Giants I take Nabers.

So your assumption is Nabers is a 'generational' talent and they can just get their franchise QB in next Spring's Draft?

MaroonBells wrote:


Or in free agency. I think they'll go that route. Teams tend to do the opposite of what didn't work last time.

Hey, you might be right. Its interesting to watch it play out regardless. I've heard some whispers that the Giants could be interested in Darnold after this season: not sure Sammy wants the big NYC microscope again however.

Giants release Daniel Jones.